<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Joel</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Joel (@joel_35ee4a2e1029ab3be255).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/joel_35ee4a2e1029ab3be255</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/joel_35ee4a2e1029ab3be255"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Invoke an execution layer for AI agents that prevents duplicate real-world actions</title>
      <dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 08:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/joel_35ee4a2e1029ab3be255/invoke-an-execution-layer-for-ai-agents-that-prevents-duplicate-real-world-actions-3ddn</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/joel_35ee4a2e1029ab3be255/invoke-an-execution-layer-for-ai-agents-that-prevents-duplicate-real-world-actions-3ddn</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;AI agents are starting to call real production tools: Stripe, CRMs, databases, email, internal APIs.&lt;br&gt;
The part that scares me most is not the model reasoning. It’s the boring failure mode after the model decides what to do:&lt;br&gt;
An agent calls stripe.charge_customer.&lt;br&gt;
Stripe times out.&lt;br&gt;
Did the charge fail? Or did it succeed and the response got lost?&lt;br&gt;
Most agent systems treat that as a normal failure and retry. That is how you get duplicate charges, duplicate refunds, duplicate emails, duplicate database writes, etc.&lt;br&gt;
I’m building Invoke as an execution layer that sits between agents and tools.&lt;br&gt;
Instead of letting agents call tools directly, Invoke wraps each action with:&lt;br&gt;
idempotency keys&lt;br&gt;
policy checks&lt;br&gt;
approval gates&lt;br&gt;
execution receipts&lt;br&gt;
outcome reconciliation&lt;br&gt;
retry blocking when the action already happened&lt;br&gt;
audit logs for every tool call&lt;br&gt;
Example flow:&lt;br&gt;
Agent calls stripe.charge_customer&lt;br&gt;
Stripe times out&lt;br&gt;
Invoke marks the execution as UNKNOWN, not failed&lt;br&gt;
Invoke reconciles against live Stripe state&lt;br&gt;
Stripe says the charge already succeeded&lt;br&gt;
Invoke blocks the retry&lt;br&gt;
Agent receives an execution receipt and continues safely&lt;br&gt;
The goal is not “AI governance” as a buzzword. It’s more like Stripe-style execution infrastructure for agents: make every real-world action visible, scoped, idempotent, reviewable, and auditable.&lt;br&gt;
We also added an MCP/API surface so agents and MCP clients can query context, simulate policies, inspect approvals, and read execution receipts through Invoke.&lt;br&gt;
Curious if other people building agents have hit this exact timeout/retry problem yet, or if this is still mostly theoretical for your use cases.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>agents</category>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>architecture</category>
      <category>showdev</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
