DEV Community: John Builds

The 2.5-hour week: a posting system for developers who hate posting

John Builds — Wed, 29 Jul 2026 15:25:38 +0000

Most developers building a side project know they should be visible somewhere (X, LinkedIn, wherever their users are), and most quietly skip it, because context-switching out of code into "content" is miserable.

I fought this for months while building my SaaS. What stuck was making posting look like a build pipeline instead of a creative act:

Batch on Sunday (90 min). Write the whole week's posts in one sitting. Ideas come from the week's commits, bugs, and user conversations, so the material is already there.
Publish on a queue. Fixed slots, Tue/Thu/Sat. No decisions during the week.
Reply 10 minutes a day. Small comments in your niche compound faster than posts do.
Recycle monthly. Your best post from last month is new to most of this month's audience.

The mental shift: treat consistency as infrastructure. Cron beats willpower.

I ended up building this into my own product, XreplyAI, which plans and publishes across 15 platforms from one calendar: https://xreplyai.com?utm_source=devto&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=edusales-2026-07-29

Cut down, do not pad up: a distribution habit that took me too long to learn

John Builds — Tue, 28 Jul 2026 14:37:26 +0000

For about four months I ran what I thought was a content distribution system. I wrote one post, pasted it into five platforms, and four of them did nothing. I blamed the algorithms.

The algorithms were not it. One piece of writing was trying to serve five reading situations.

Someone reading a forum thread is scanning to work out whether the problem you are describing is one they have. Someone scrolling a feed is scanning for a reason to stop moving. Someone opening a long form post has already decided to give you a minute. That is three different jobs for the first sentence, even when the idea underneath is identical.

Two habits fixed most of it.

Cut down, do not pad up

I write the idea once at its longest honest length, the version where I have said everything I actually have. Every platform then gets a cut of that. The short ones get the sharpest 40 words rather than a paragraph that gets amputated at the character limit.

Padding a thin idea out to fill a long post is how you end up with filler paragraphs that say nothing. Cutting a full idea down to fit a short one just makes it denser.

Rewrite the opening, leave the middle alone

The opening is the part most people read anywhere, so it is the part that has to be native to where it lands. The middle travels fine.

On a forum the opening states the problem, because people are scanning to see whether it is their problem. On a feed it has to be a claim someone would push back on, because people are scanning for a reason to stop.

A quick diagnostic

If you are not sure which one you are doing, try pasting your post into a different platform without changing anything. If it fits perfectly, that is usually a sign it was written for no one in particular rather than a sign it was written well for both.

The two changes that fixed Instagram for me, neither about quality

John Builds — Sun, 26 Jul 2026 14:00:57 +0000

I spent about a year being bad at Instagram before I admitted the problem wasn't the platform.

I'd been treating it like a quality problem. Better images, better captions, more thought per post. What actually moved it were two changes that have nothing to do with quality.

Stop making it a daily decision

Every previous attempt failed the same way. Some point in the day I'd sit down, try to think of something worth saying, feel uninspired, and skip it. Then skip the next day too, because the streak was already broken and one more didn't matter.

The fix was moving the decision somewhere else entirely. Ninety minutes on Sunday, seven posts, one goes out per day. Weekday me doesn't get a vote, because weekday me is the one who kept talking us out of it.

The individual posts got slightly worse. The account did considerably better. That still bothers me a little. I'd spent a year optimizing the wrong variable.

If you build things, the analogy is probably familiar. This is the same reason you set up CI instead of promising yourself you'll run the tests. Removing the decision beats strengthening the resolve.

Comment before you post

The second change: I keep a list of about twenty accounts in adjacent niches and I actually read them. Not the big ones, since nobody sees your comment under a post with four thousand others. People roughly my size or slightly ahead, talking to the audience I want to reach.

A few genuine comments most days. Not "love this," an actual response to the thing they said.

I avoided this for months because it produces nothing. There's no artifact, no output, nothing to point at afterward. But when I trace back where followers actually came from, it's comment threads far more often than my own posts. Posting makes you findable to people already looking for you. Commenting puts you in front of people who aren't.

One detail that matters more than it should: comment first, post second. Post first and the next hour disappears into refreshing your own numbers.

Can You Schedule a Post on TikTok? (2026)

John Builds — Thu, 23 Jul 2026 18:24:19 +0000

Yes. TikTok's native scheduler works for Business and Creator accounts on desktop or TikTok Studio, from 15 minutes to 10 days ahead. Personal accounts cannot schedule natively. Third-party tools extend the window and add multi-platform publishing.So can you schedule a post on TikTok? Yes, and it takes about a minute once you know where the option lives. The catch is that TikTok hides scheduling behind two requirements: the right account type and the right surface. The mobile app you post from every day does not have the feature at all.

You batch-filmed five videos on Sunday. Without scheduling, TikTok still expects you in the app at 6pm on Tuesday to hit publish. Scheduling breaks that dependency: upload everything in one sitting, assign each video a slot, and get back to work.

Below: who can schedule, the exact desktop steps, the mobile workarounds, the native limits nobody dates correctly, and how to run TikTok from the same calendar as every other platform you post to.

Who can schedule a post on TikTok (and who can't)

In short: Business and Creator accounts can use TikTok's native scheduler; personal accounts cannot schedule at all without a third-party tool.

TikTok gates its Video Scheduler behind account type. Run a Business or Creator account and the schedule option appears on the desktop upload page. Personal accounts never see it, no matter which device or browser they use.

Switching is free and takes under a minute. Open the TikTok app, go to Settings and privacy, tap Account, and switch to a Business account or turn on Creator tools. Most solo founders should pick Creator: you keep the full music library, which Business accounts trade away for commercial-licensed sounds only.

The account-type gate applies only to native scheduling. Tools that publish through TikTok's official content API can schedule for any account that completes the OAuth connection, which is why many personal-account creators skip the switch entirely and schedule through a tool instead.

How to schedule a TikTok post on desktop

In short: upload your video at tiktok.com, select Schedule under the When to post setting, pick a date and time, and click Schedule.

The native TikTok video scheduler lives on the web upload page, not in the mobile app. Here is the full flow:

Log in at tiktok.com in a desktop browser and click the Upload button in the top bar.
Select your video file and let it process.
Write your caption, add hashtags and mentions, and pick a cover frame.
Scroll to When to post and select Schedule instead of Now.
Choose a date and time between 15 minutes and 10 days out.
Click Schedule. TikTok publishes the video automatically at that time; you do not need to be online.

Two details worth checking before you close the tab. First, the scheduler uses the time zone from your account settings, so verify it if you are posting for an audience in another region. Second, review everything twice: caption, cover, sounds, and privacy settings all lock in once you hit Schedule, and there is no edit screen afterward.

Your queued videos appear in TikTok Studio on the web under Posts, each with a Scheduled label and its publish time.

Can you schedule TikTok posts on mobile?

In short: the main TikTok app cannot schedule posts; the separate TikTok Studio app can, and so can any third-party scheduler with a mobile-friendly dashboard.

The gap surprises almost everyone: the app where you film, edit, and publish has no schedule option anywhere in its upload flow. TikTok put scheduling on desktop and left the main app out.

Your first mobile option is the TikTok Studio app, a separate free download built for creators. Its upload flow includes the same scheduling control as the web uploader, with the same account-type requirement. If you manage TikTok entirely from your phone, install it alongside the main app.

Your second option is the browser workaround: open tiktok.com in your phone's browser and request the desktop site. The upload page loads with the schedule option intact. It works, but pinch-zooming through a desktop layout on a phone screen gets old after the second video.

The third option is a scheduling tool. Because tools publish through TikTok's API rather than the app, you can queue posts from any browser on any device, including the phone where your videos already live.

Native scheduler limits, as of July 2026

Most guides get the numbers wrong or leave them undated, so here are the limits with a date attached.

Advance window: 15 minutes to 10 days, as of July 2026. TikTok's official Video Scheduler documentation states the web upload page accepts schedules between 15 minutes and 10 days ahead for Business and Creator accounts. That is the full range in which you can schedule posts on TikTok natively. You will find articles claiming a 30-day window; that figure usually comes from TikTok Shop's separate shoppable-video scheduler, not the regular Video Scheduler covered here. Trust the number on the upload page in front of you, and treat the official 10-day figure as the default.

No editing after scheduling. Once a video is queued, you cannot change the caption, cover, or publish time. Your only move is deleting the scheduled post and re-uploading from scratch.

Music restrictions on Business accounts. Business accounts can only use sounds from TikTok's commercial music library, and that applies to scheduled posts too. Trending audio is largely off the table.

One platform, one post. The native scheduler publishes to TikTok only. The same vertical video destined for Reels and Shorts means two more upload flows in two more apps.

Format rules do not change when you schedule: the same duration and file-size caps apply as regular uploads. Check the current numbers in our TikTok video length and specs reference before you batch-export.

How do you schedule TikTok alongside every other platform?

In short: a multi-platform scheduler queues TikTok on the same calendar as Instagram, YouTube, X, and the rest, so one planning session covers every channel.

Almost nobody who schedules TikTok posts stops at TikTok. The same vertical video usually goes to Reels and Shorts, the announcement goes to X and LinkedIn, and suddenly one video is five upload flows across five tabs.

A one-calendar workflow collapses that. In XreplyAI, you connect your accounts once, drop the video in a single composer, pick TikTok plus whichever other platforms you want, and schedule everything from one screen. The TikTok scheduling tool handles the TikTok side, and the same calendar lets you post to all your social media at once: 15 platforms total: X, LinkedIn, Instagram, Threads, Facebook, YouTube, TikTok, Pinterest, Bluesky, Mastodon, Discord, Telegram, Tumblr, Google Business, and Slack.

Queued posts stay editable until they publish, which fixes the most annoying native limit: spot a typo, click the post, fix it. No delete-and-reupload. Scheduling also runs further out than 10 days, so a month of batch-filmed content fits in one planning pass. If a caption needs a platform-specific rewrite, AI drafting can help, but the calendar is the point.

Pricing is flat, with no per-seat fees, which matters once a VA or cofounder shares the queue.

When is the native scheduler enough?

In short: native scheduling is enough if you post to TikTok only, plan less than 10 days out, and can live without editing queued posts; a tool earns its cost once you publish to several platforms.

The native scheduler is free and reliable. If TikTok is your only channel and you queue a few posts a week, use it and spend the money elsewhere. The same logic applies to scheduling Instagram with Meta Business Suite: the free native option is genuinely fine for a single-platform habit.

	TikTok native scheduler	Scheduling tool
Cost	Free	Paid, flat monthly
Account types	Business and Creator only	Any connected account
Advance window	15 minutes to 10 days	Months ahead
Edit after scheduling	No, delete and re-upload	Yes, edit in the queue
Mobile scheduling	TikTok Studio app only	Any browser
Other platforms	TikTok only	TikTok plus every other channel (15 platforms), one calendar

The switch point is platform count, not posting volume. One platform, native wins on price. Three or more platforms, and the hours spent re-uploading the same video into different apps cost more than any subscription.

Yes, you can schedule a post on TikTok, and the free native scheduler does the job if TikTok is your only channel: desktop or TikTok Studio, Business or Creator account, up to 10 days ahead as of July 2026. Know its edges before you rely on it, because queued posts cannot be edited and the window is shorter than most guides claim.

The native option stops being enough the moment TikTok becomes one channel of several. If the same video also goes to Reels, Shorts, and a text version on X, one calendar beats four upload flows every week. XreplyAI schedules TikTok alongside the rest of your channels, 15 platforms on one calendar, with editable queues and flat pricing. Try it free for 10 days, no card required.

Source: TikTok: Introducing Video Scheduler

Frequently Asked Questions

Can you schedule a post on TikTok with a personal account?

No, not natively. TikTok's Video Scheduler only appears for Business and Creator accounts. Switching account types is free and takes under a minute in Settings. Alternatively, third-party tools that publish through TikTok's API can schedule for any account you connect, personal included.

Can you edit a scheduled TikTok post?

Not natively. Once a TikTok is scheduled, the caption, cover, and publish time are locked. To change anything, delete the scheduled post and re-upload the video. Third-party schedulers like XreplyAI let you edit queued posts freely up until they publish.

How far in advance can you schedule a TikTok post?

Natively, from 15 minutes to 10 days ahead, per TikTok's official Video Scheduler documentation as of July 2026. Some guides claim 30 days, but that figure comes from TikTok Shop's separate shoppable-video scheduler. Trust the upload page. Scheduling tools extend the window to months.

Does scheduling a TikTok post hurt reach?

No evidence says it does. TikTok publishes scheduled posts through its own system, exactly like a manual upload, and has never stated that scheduled content is ranked differently. Posting when your audience is active matters far more than whether you hit publish by hand.

Where do scheduled TikTok posts appear before publishing?

In TikTok Studio on the web, under Posts, each marked with a Scheduled label and its publish time. Followers see nothing until the video goes live. On mobile, the TikTok Studio app shows the same queue; the main TikTok app does not display scheduled posts.

What happens if a scheduled TikTok fails to publish?

The video stays in your TikTok Studio queue instead of going live, usually because the file violated a guideline or your session expired. TikTok does not always notify you, so check the queue after each publish time. Scheduling tools surface failures with an alert and let you retry.

Can you schedule to TikTok and other platforms at once?

Not with TikTok's native scheduler, which publishes to TikTok only. A multi-platform scheduler does it in one pass: upload the video once, select TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, and any other connected platforms, and schedule them together from one calendar. XreplyAI covers 15 platforms this way.

When is the best time to schedule TikTok posts?

When your audience is online, which TikTok shows under follower activity in its analytics for Business and Creator accounts. Start there, test a few slots, and keep what performs. For cross-platform timing, our free best time to post tool is a useful starting point.

Originally published at xreplyai.com.

I built a free tool that turns a blog post into three platform-native social posts

John Builds — Wed, 22 Jul 2026 16:07:14 +0000

My blog posts kept ending their lives at "publish." The ideas were fine; I just never did the repurposing step, because rewriting the same idea per platform is a chore.

So I built a free tool for exactly that step. Paste up to ~5,000 characters of your post, pick a platform (X, LinkedIn, Instagram, Threads, or Facebook), and it generates three candidate social posts, each from a different angle: the core insight, a specific detail, and a question-led hook. Platform formatting (character limits, structure, hashtag conventions) is handled per target.

The design constraint I cared most about: it only uses facts and examples present in the pasted text. For this use case an invented statistic is worse than a bland post, so it extracts instead of embellishing.

No login required. Try it here: https://xreplyai.com/tools/blog-to-social-post-generator?utm_source=devto&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=feature-2026-07-22

If you write dev blog posts and never share them, this is for you.

The bug that taught me to grep before I git blame

John Builds — Mon, 20 Jul 2026 19:29:58 +0000

A user reported that a feature had stopped working. Classic regression report: "we used to have X, now it's gone." So I did what you do. I opened the git log, found the refactor that touched that area, and started reading diffs looking for the commit that removed it.

I spent an afternoon proving a negative.

Nothing had removed it. The behavior had been specified, discussed in an issue, and referenced in a PR description as done. But the code path never existed in the new component. It had been built in the old implementation, and when the new one was written behind a flag, that particular piece sat on someone's hand-written parity checklist and quietly never got ticked.

The part I keep thinking about is how the framing picked my strategy for me. The word "regression" carries an assumption: that the thing existed and then stopped existing. Accept that assumption and you reach for git bisect, git log, blame. Reject it and you reach for grep. One of those answers the question in ten seconds and the other burns an afternoon.

What made it worse is that a hand-written parity checklist is not a diff. Someone listed the features they thought needed porting, and the list was incomplete, which is the normal state of hand-written lists. A green test suite did not help either, because nobody writes a test for a thing that was never built.

So now the first thing I do with any regression report is grep the current code for the behavior. If it is not there, I stop looking for who deleted it and start asking whether it ever shipped. It costs ten seconds and it has saved me twice since.

A bug report describes a symptom. It is not a diagnosis, even when it sounds like one.

Few-shot beats system prompts for making AI write like you

John Builds — Thu, 16 Jul 2026 17:18:34 +0000

I automate a chunk of my social content, and the biggest quality jump came from a boring change: fewer instructions, more examples.

Instruction tuning ("witty, conversational, no corporate speak") converges on the same voice for everyone, because everyone writes roughly the same adjectives. The model regresses to the mean of its training data with a light stylistic filter on top.

What actually moved the output: few-shot with my own archive. Around 50 published posts in context gives the model concrete evidence of sentence length, opener patterns, question frequency, and how blunt I am. Drafts went from rewrite-everything to light edits.

Practical notes if you build something like this:

Curate the examples. Your 50 best posts, not your last 50.
Refresh them as your voice drifts.
Judge output on consistency across a month of posts, not on any single draft.

I built this pipeline into XreplyAI (a scheduler for 15 platforms with drafts trained on your own post archive): https://xreplyai.com?utm_source=devto&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=edusales-2026-07-16

The two-job problem: why solo founders quit posting by week two

John Builds — Thu, 09 Jul 2026 19:33:57 +0000

Every "post every day" attempt I made died the same way: strong Monday, decent Tuesday, gone by Thursday. I assumed discipline. The actual culprit was structural.

A blank composer hands you two jobs simultaneously: decide what's worth saying, then write it well. Each is manageable alone. Together, daily, between actual work? That's the failure mode.

The fix is boring and it works. Split the jobs across the week:

Sunday, 30 minutes: decide the week's topics. One line per topic. Drafting is banned in this session. The moment you start writing, you're doing the second job and the session bloats.

Monday, one hour: write everything. Since deciding already happened, this feels like transcription. Seven posts, one sitting.

Tuesday onward: nothing. The thinking is done.

The principle underneath: separate decision energy from execution energy. Deciding needs a clear head and suffers most from context-switching. Execution tolerates interruption fine. Schedule accordingly.

If your streak keeps dying, audit the structure before you blame the discipline.

Building a forgiving retention streak: weekly units + a monthly freeze

John Builds — Sun, 05 Jul 2026 17:05:36 +0000

Most streak features are daily and unforgiving: miss one day, reset to zero. For a tool aimed at busy founders, that's a great way to make people churn instead of come back. I wanted a streak that pulls users back weekly without punishing a normal busy stretch.

I just shipped a weekly retention streak on my scheduling app and made a few deliberate design calls worth sharing:

Weekly, not daily unit. Publish once in a week and the streak holds. For most solo founders, consistent presence is a weekly rhythm, not a daily one.
Monthly freeze. One missed week per calendar month is auto-bridged by a free "freeze" instead of resetting. Two consecutive empty weeks resets to 0.
In-progress weeks don't break it. A current week with no posts yet isn't a miss until it's over.
Milestones at 4/12/26/52 weeks and a dismissible at-risk nudge when nothing is scheduled late in the week.

The hard part was tuning "forgiving enough that people don't quit" against "strict enough that the streak still means something." The monthly-freeze plus two-week-reset combo felt like the right balance for retention.

https://xreplyai.com?utm_source=devto&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=feature-2026-07-05

Why I killed per-seat pricing on my SaaS

John Builds — Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:47:54 +0000

I just restructured pricing for my social scheduling tool, and team pricing was the call I agonized over.

Almost everyone in my category charges per seat. Add a teammate, the bill goes up. Add a contractor for one launch, the bill goes up. It taxes the exact behavior you want: more hands on the work. In practice it pushes people to share one login, which is worse for everyone.

So I dropped per-seat. One flat team price, invite whoever you want, shared calendar, an approval step before anything publishes. The bill doesn't move when the team does. Under it, a cheap solo tier for schedule-and-post, and a middle tier for people who use the AI reply and auto-DM features.

The tradeoff is real: I give up seat-expansion revenue. I'm betting lower friction to add people means more teams stick, and for an early tool, retention beats that upside.

How do you price for teams without punishing growth? Building this into XreplyAI: https://xreplyai.com?utm_source=devto&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=edusales-2026-06-30

LinkedIn Growth for Solo Founders

John Builds — Fri, 19 Jun 2026 14:06:21 +0000

LinkedIn growth for solo founders comes down to four levers: a hook that stops the scroll, dwell-time-optimized content, a deliberate commenting strategy, and consistent output without living on the platform.

LinkedIn is not X. The algorithm is different, the content formats are different, and the audience expectations are different. A thread that crushes on X often falls flat on LinkedIn. A document carousel that drives 50,000 impressions on LinkedIn would never work as a tweet. If you're copying your X growth strategy onto LinkedIn, you're leaving most of the platform's reach on the table.

LinkedIn rewards dwell time over click-through rate. It surfaces content into second and third-degree networks through comments, not just likes. And it treats certain formats — text posts, carousels, document uploads — very differently from each other. Understanding those mechanics is the difference between a post that gets 200 impressions and one that gets 20,000 with the same word count.

This guide covers what actually moves the needle for solo founders: the LinkedIn algorithm signals that matter in 2026, the content formats worth investing in, a comment strategy that builds reach outside your existing network, and how to maintain consistency without turning LinkedIn into a part-time job. If you're also managing presence across X and LinkedIn as a B2B founder, the frameworks here complement each other without requiring you to live on either platform.

LinkedIn growth for solo founders is not about being everywhere or posting every day. It's about understanding the algorithm signals that actually matter, using the formats that fit your content type, leaving substantive comments that surface your voice in front of new audiences, and staying consistent long enough for the compounding to kick in.

The founders who build real LinkedIn audiences do it with a system, not with inspiration. A weekly drafting session, a daily commenting block, and AI tools that help you maintain your voice when you're generating content in batches. If you want to build that system without making LinkedIn a second job, XreplyAI handles the drafting, scheduling, and cross-platform consistency so you can focus on the parts that require your judgment. Start free and see what consistent LinkedIn presence looks like when the friction is removed.

Frequently Asked Questions

How often should a solo founder post on LinkedIn?

3-4 times per week is the practical target for founders balancing LinkedIn with building. Posting daily is possible but risks quality dropping. Fewer than 3 posts per week slows the algorithm learning curve significantly. Consistency beats volume.

What is the best content format for LinkedIn growth in 2026?

Text posts are the most sustainable format for consistent growth. Document carousels drive the highest single-post reach when executed well. Polls drive comment engagement. A rotation across all three outperforms relying on any one format alone.

Does commenting on other posts actually help you grow on LinkedIn?

Yes, commenting is the highest-leverage growth activity for accounts under 5,000 followers. Substantive comments on posts from accounts with 3,000-15,000 followers surface your name to audiences you don't have access to through your own posts alone.

Why do external links hurt LinkedIn post reach?

LinkedIn's algorithm deprioritizes posts with outbound links because they pull users off the platform. Put external links in the first comment instead of the post body. The post reaches more people, and the link is still accessible to anyone who wants it.

How long does LinkedIn organic growth take for founders?

Expect 60-90 days before growth becomes consistent. The first 30 days are slow while the algorithm builds a picture of your account and audience. Engagement quality, specifically substantive comments from people outside your network, is the leading indicator that growth is accelerating.

What makes a LinkedIn post go viral for a founder?

Specificity and contrarian takes drive the most distribution. Build-in-public posts with real numbers, honest failure retrospectives, and opinionated takes on accepted wisdom in your niche consistently outperform generic advice posts. The comment question at the end is the mechanism that drives distribution.

Can I use AI to write LinkedIn posts without sounding generic?

Yes, if the AI is trained on your own content rather than generic style prompts. Tools that build a voice profile from your actual writing produce drafts that sound like you. The hook and closing question should still be reviewed manually, as those are where your specific voice matters most.

How is LinkedIn growth different from X growth for founders?

LinkedIn rewards dwell time and comment velocity over click-through rate. Comments carry more algorithmic weight than likes. Document carousels are a major distribution format with no equivalent on X. And external links hurt reach on LinkedIn in a way they do not on X.

Originally published at xreplyai.com.

I built per-platform post customization so I'd stop cross-posting identical text

John Builds — Thu, 18 Jun 2026 15:49:55 +0000

I post across about a dozen networks, and the post body was the friction point. Send the same text everywhere and it reads lazy (and gets throttled as near-duplicate). Rewrite each one by hand and you're writing the same idea five times before 9am.

So I built a base-plus-override composer. You write the post once on an "All" tab. That base text auto-fills every connected platform. Each platform then has its own tab where you tweak only that version: trim for X's 280, use Bluesky's longer limit, add hashtags on Threads. Every tab shows its own live character count, and a Reset button reverts a tab to the base if you overdo it.

The win is that you edit where it matters and leave the rest on the base, instead of a blank box per platform. Most posts I change one or two tabs and let the others ride.

It's part of XreplyAI, a scheduler that publishes across 14 platforms from one calendar on one subscription, no per-seat fees. Free plan, no card: https://xreplyai.com/?utm_source=devto&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=feature-2026-06-18

How do you handle cross-posting today?