<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Jon Jönsson</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Jon Jönsson (@jonjonssons).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/jonjonssons</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/jonjonssons"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>10 AI prompts that make recruiting searches more auditable</title>
      <dc:creator>Jon Jönsson</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 06:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/jonjonssons/10-ai-prompts-that-make-recruiting-searches-more-auditable-34p7</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/jonjonssons/10-ai-prompts-that-make-recruiting-searches-more-auditable-34p7</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Recruiting workflows often become a chain of tabs, copy-paste and decisions nobody can explain later. The prompts below are designed to force evidence into the process.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They are not magic words. The useful part is the structure: each prompt names the input, the decision and the evidence required.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The full open playbook is available on &lt;a href="https://github.com/jonjonssons/ai-recruiter-playbook" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;GitHub&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  1. Turn a vague brief into search criteria
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Convert this hiring brief into a structured sourcing plan. Return target titles, adjacent titles, must-have skills, likely false positives, target locations, target companies and five questions that would materially improve the search. Brief: [paste the real brief]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This catches ambiguity before it turns into a bad shortlist.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  2. Build an evidence-first scorecard
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Create a 100-point candidate scorecard for this role. Every criterion must be observable in a public profile or resume. Separate must-haves from nice-to-haves and explain what evidence earns full, partial or zero points. Role: [paste role]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If a criterion cannot be observed, it should not silently drive ranking.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  3. Expand titles without losing relevance
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Starting from [title], generate direct equivalents, adjacent titles and titles that look similar but should be excluded. Explain the distinction in one sentence per group. Market: [industry and location]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The exclusion group matters as much as the expansion group.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  4. Map the companies where talent is likely to sit
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Map the types of companies most likely to employ strong [role] talent in [location]. Group them by industry, business model and company stage. Explain why each group is relevant and what would make it a false positive.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This replaces random company lists with a defensible talent-market hypothesis.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  5. Reverse-map a client market
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I recruit [role]. Describe how to identify US companies that already employ this role and are likely to hire it again. Return the buyer titles to target at startups, mid-market companies and enterprises.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Recruiters can use the talent market itself as a signal for future client demand.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  6. Turn job openings into recruitment leads
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Given these live job openings, rank the companies by likelihood to use an external recruiter. Use hiring volume, role difficulty, urgency signals, team growth and buyer accessibility. Jobs: [paste links or details]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A job post is a signal, not proof of agency demand. The ranking should explain the gap.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  7. Find the actual hiring buyer
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For a company hiring [role], list the most likely buyer titles in priority order. Adjust for company size and distinguish the economic buyer, hiring manager and internal recruiting owner.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This prevents sending the same generic pitch to HR, a functional leader and a founder.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  8. Write outreach from evidence
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Draft a short first message to [person] at [company]. Use only these verified facts: [facts]. Connect one fact to one recruiting problem. Ask one low-friction question. Do not use hype, fake familiarity or generic compliments.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The model should not invent personalization to make a message sound warmer.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  9. Audit a shortlist for hidden assumptions
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Review this shortlist against the role scorecard. Identify unsupported assumptions, duplicated profiles, missing talent pools and candidates who look relevant only because of title matching. Shortlist: [paste list]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Use the model as a critic after using it as a generator.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  10. Build a five-day desk plan
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Build a five-day operating plan for this recruitment desk. Include candidate sourcing, client mapping, decision-maker research, outreach and follow-up. Prioritize actions by expected placements or new business, not by activity volume. Desk: [describe niche]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The output should optimize for outcomes, not a longer task list.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  One operating rule
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Keep the raw brief, criteria, evidence and final decision connected. When those pieces live in separate tools, auditability disappears quickly.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I built &lt;a href="https://instalent.io/auth/register?utm_source=devto&amp;amp;utm_medium=article&amp;amp;utm_campaign=us_trials_12h_aug26&amp;amp;utm_content=auditable_recruiting_prompts" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Instalent&lt;/a&gt; to run candidate sourcing, client mapping, decision-maker research, scoring and outreach from one real brief. It has a free 7-day trial. No call is required.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Founder disclosure: I am the founder of Instalent. The prompts are useful without the product, and the GitHub playbook is public.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>productivity</category>
      <category>career</category>
      <category>agents</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
