<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Juan Carlos Pascual</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Juan Carlos Pascual (@juankkipas).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/juankkipas</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/juankkipas"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>What 99.9% Uptime Actually Means</title>
      <dc:creator>Juan Carlos Pascual</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 13:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/juankkipas/what-999-uptime-actually-means-1mb2</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/juankkipas/what-999-uptime-actually-means-1mb2</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;"Three nines" sounds strict. 99.9% available — surely that is basically always up? It works out to nearly &lt;strong&gt;nine hours of downtime a year&lt;/strong&gt;, or about 43 minutes in a 30-day month. Whether that is fine or alarming depends entirely on what your service does.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The nines, in real time
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;div class="table-wrapper-paragraph"&gt;&lt;table&gt;
&lt;thead&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Uptime&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Name&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Downtime per month&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Downtime per year&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/thead&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;99%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;two nines&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;7h 12m&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;3d 15h 36m&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;99.9%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;three nines&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;43m 12s&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;8h 45m 36s&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;99.99%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;four nines&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;4m 19s&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;52m 34s&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;99.999%&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;five nines&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;26s&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;5m 15s&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Two patterns jump out. First, the jump from 99% to 99.9% removes almost four days of yearly downtime — a big, usually worthwhile improvement. Second, every nine after that cuts the remaining budget by about 90%, and the absolute savings get smaller while the engineering effort to achieve them grows sharply.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Why each nine is so expensive
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Going from 99.9% to 99.99% means your yearly outage allowance drops from nearly nine hours to under an hour. In practice that requires:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;redundancy across independent failure domains, not just a spare server&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;automated failover that is regularly tested, not a runbook someone follows at 3am&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;a deploy process tight enough that releases rarely cause incidents&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;on-call coverage with people who can actually fix things&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;monitoring that catches problems in seconds, not when a customer emails&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Each of those adds cost and operational complexity. Most products do not need more than three nines. Picking a target higher than your users require mostly buys you stress and a larger infrastructure bill.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  SLA, SLO, and what you actually measured
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;SLA&lt;/strong&gt; — the availability you promise in a contract, often with refunds or credits if you miss it.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;SLO&lt;/strong&gt; — the internal target your team works to. Set it stricter than the SLA so you have a safety margin before penalties kick in.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Actual uptime&lt;/strong&gt; — what you measured over the period. The gap between this and your SLO is your early-warning signal.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One more contract detail: many SLAs &lt;strong&gt;exclude announced maintenance windows&lt;/strong&gt; from the downtime calculation. Read the definition of "downtime" and "excluded events" before you compare your measured number to the promise.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Pick the target from the cost of being down
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The right availability target is a business decision, not an engineering one. Work out what an hour of downtime actually costs you — lost revenue, staff who cannot work, recovery effort — and compare that to the cost of the next nine. If an outage costs a few hundred dollars an hour, chasing five nines makes no sense. If it costs tens of thousands, three nines is probably not enough.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Do the maths
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="https://devfinancetools.com/uptime-sla-calculator/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;uptime / SLA calculator&lt;/a&gt; converts any availability percentage into exact downtime per day, week, month and year, and also works backwards from a measured outage to the percentage it produced. Pair it with the &lt;a href="https://devfinancetools.com/cost-of-downtime-calculator/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;cost of downtime calculator&lt;/a&gt; to put a dollar figure on each minute — the number that tells you how much reliability is worth buying.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>devops</category>
      <category>sre</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
      <category>career</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
