<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: William Willison</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by William Willison (@karthikireddy751).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/karthikireddy751</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/karthikireddy751"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Runway Math for Your Side Project (or Your SaaS)</title>
      <dc:creator>William Willison</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2026 05:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/karthikireddy751/runway-math-for-your-side-project-or-your-saas-g4a</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/karthikireddy751/runway-math-for-your-side-project-or-your-saas-g4a</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;You don’t need an accountant to answer the one question every cash-strapped project has to face: how many months before the money runs out? That number is your runway, and it’s one division away from your bank balance.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The three numbers that matter&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Net cash flow = inflows − outflows, per month. For a side project: revenue in, hosting + tooling + time-equivalent out.&lt;br&gt;
Burn = what happens when outflows exceed inflows. That’s the deadline-setter, not the average.&lt;br&gt;
Runway = current cash ÷ burn. Not “how long the project lasts” — how long it lasts at the current burn rate.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A worked example&lt;br&gt;
A small SaaS brings in $8,000/month and spends $6,200 — net +$1,800, which feels safe until revenue dips 30% for a quarter: $5,600 in, $6,200 out, now burning $600/month. With $10,000 in the bank, runway at that burn is $10,000 ÷ $600 ≈ 16.7 months. Plenty — until you add the $20,000 equipment purchase you’ve been deferring, which is 33 months of that burn, and the cushion is gone.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The habit that matters: re-enter these numbers monthly from receipts, not from the plan. A forecast is a promise; a receipt is a fact.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I keep the inflow/outflow/runway math in one free screen (no signup): the cash flow calculator at CalculatorPro (&lt;a href="https://calculatorpro.org/finance/cash-flow" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;calculatorpro.org/finance/cash-flow&lt;/a&gt;). Type in the two sides and it returns the net flow, your ending balance, and the runway number to argue with.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Informational only — not financial advice.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
      <category>productivity</category>
      <category>programming</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stop Rewriting Simple Calculation Logic — There’s a Smarter Way</title>
      <dc:creator>William Willison</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 06:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/karthikireddy751/stop-rewriting-simple-calculation-logic-theres-a-smarter-way-11oo</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/karthikireddy751/stop-rewriting-simple-calculation-logic-theres-a-smarter-way-11oo</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If you’ve built even a few projects, you’ve probably written the same calculation logic more times than you’d like to admit.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Percentages. Ratios. EMI formulas. Unit conversions. Basic arithmetic wrapped in utility functions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At first, it feels fine. You write a helper function, test it quickly, and move on.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But over time, it becomes repetitive.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Real Issue Isn’t Complexity&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Let’s be honest — most of these calculations aren’t hard.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The problem is:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;rewriting the same logic again and again&lt;br&gt;
verifying correctness every time&lt;br&gt;
breaking your flow just to check a formula&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Even something as simple as a percentage increase can pull you out of your coding context.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You stop → search → calculate → return → resume coding.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That context switching adds up.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When External Tools Actually Make Sense&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For production code, sure — you’ll implement your own logic.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But for:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;quick validation&lt;br&gt;
prototyping&lt;br&gt;
debugging&lt;br&gt;
internal tools&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Using external calculators can save time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Instead of writing temporary logic or guessing formulas, you can validate results instantly.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you want a practical look at how these tools simplify everyday calculations, this&lt;br&gt;
👉 &lt;a href="https://calculatorpro.mystrikingly.com/blog/make-everyday-calculations-faster-and-less-frustrating" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;quick breakdown of calculator workflows&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Reduce Friction in Your Workflow&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Think about how often you:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;test math-heavy logic&lt;br&gt;
double-check financial calculations&lt;br&gt;
validate outputs manually&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now imagine skipping that step.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Instead of writing a quick script or console log, you just plug values into a tool and confirm the result.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For example, using&lt;br&gt;
👉 &lt;a href="https://calculatorpro.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;a centralized set of online calculators&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
lets you test and verify values without writing extra code.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It’s especially useful when you’re:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;building MVPs&lt;br&gt;
debugging edge cases&lt;br&gt;
validating user inputs&lt;br&gt;
It’s Not About Avoiding Code&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This isn’t about replacing your logic.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It’s about:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;working faster&lt;br&gt;
reducing repetition&lt;br&gt;
minimizing small mistakes&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You still write clean, reliable code where it matters. But you avoid wasting time on things that don’t need to be rebuilt.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Where This Helps Most&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;From experience, this approach is useful in:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Rapid Prototyping&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You don’t want to build everything from scratch just to test an idea.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Debugging&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Quickly confirm if your calculations are correct.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Learning&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Understand formulas without getting stuck in manual math.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Internal Tools&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Speed matters more than perfect implementation.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Final Thoughts&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As developers, we focus a lot on performance, architecture, and clean code.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But improving your workflow is just as important.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you can remove even small interruptions from your process, it makes a noticeable difference over time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sometimes the smartest move isn’t writing more code — it’s knowing when not to.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>kotlin</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
