<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Kendall Ellis</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Kendall Ellis (@kendall_codes).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/kendall_codes</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/kendall_codes"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Why I stopped reaching for Redis first</title>
      <dc:creator>Kendall Ellis</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 15:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/kendall_codes/why-i-stopped-reaching-for-redis-first-2i9g</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/kendall_codes/why-i-stopped-reaching-for-redis-first-2i9g</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Every time a service got slow, my reflex was to add a cache. This week I finally ran the numbers on one of those services and found that the cache was hiding a bad query plan.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A quick &lt;code&gt;EXPLAIN ANALYZE&lt;/code&gt; showed a sequential scan on a table that had grown 10x. Adding one composite index cut p99 from 900ms to 80ms — no cache needed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not saying Redis is bad (it's great, and we still use it). The lesson is just: measure before caching.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We're on Postgres 16 now, and the planner has been excellent once the statistics are fresh. Curious how others handle index review — manual, or automated in CI?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>postgres</category>
      <category>database</category>
      <category>performance</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
