<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Key-wxh</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Key-wxh (@keywxh).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/keywxh</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/keywxh"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>I Built an AI SEO Brief Generator That Compares 3 Models Side-by-Side — Here's the Architecture</title>
      <dc:creator>Key-wxh</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 02:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/keywxh/i-built-an-ai-seo-brief-generator-that-compares-3-models-side-by-side-heres-the-architecture-4he9</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/keywxh/i-built-an-ai-seo-brief-generator-that-compares-3-models-side-by-side-heres-the-architecture-4he9</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I spent 3 months building an SEO content brief generator, and I wanted to share the technical architecture with the dev.to community.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The Problem
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;SEO content briefs are the pre-writing research phase for blog posts — you analyze the SERP, figure out search intent, outline the article structure, and suggest metadata. Most people do this manually, spending 1-2 hours per article.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The Solution
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://seobrief.cc" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;seobrief.cc&lt;/a&gt; — keyword in, complete brief out in ~30 seconds.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Technical Architecture
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Frontend:&lt;/strong&gt; Next.js 16 + Tailwind v4 + React Server Components&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Backend:&lt;/strong&gt; Next.js API routes (edge-compatible)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Database/Auth:&lt;/strong&gt; Supabase (Postgres + Auth + Row Level Security)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Payments:&lt;/strong&gt; Stripe Checkout (subscription)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;AI:&lt;/strong&gt; 3 LLMs running in parallel:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;DeepSeek V3 (primary, best quality)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Qwen (backup, fast)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Moonshot (backup, different perspective)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hosting:&lt;/strong&gt; Vercel (production), with &lt;code&gt;@vercel/analytics&lt;/code&gt; for traffic&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  How the Multi-Model Comparison Works
&lt;/h2&gt;



&lt;div class="highlight js-code-highlight"&gt;
&lt;pre class="highlight plaintext"&gt;&lt;code&gt;
typescript
// Simplified — the actual route calls 3 providers in parallel
const [deepseek, qwen, moonshot] = await Promise.allSettled([
  generateBrief(keyword, 'deepseek'),
  generateBrief(keyword, 'qwen'),
  generateBrief(keyword, 'moonshot'),
]);

// Score each result, return all 3 + recommendation
const results = [deepseek, qwen, moonshot]
  .filter(r =&amp;gt; r.status === 'fulfilled')
  .map(r =&amp;gt; ({ ...r.value, score: scoreBrief(r.value) }));

return { results, recommended: results.sort((a, b) =&amp;gt; b.score - a.score)[0] };
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>architecture</category>
      <category>nextjs</category>
      <category>showdev</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
