<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: KingGyu</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by KingGyu (@kinggyusuh).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/kinggyusuh</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/kinggyusuh"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Open-sourcing my personal AI Agent Harness for Production (harness-loom)</title>
      <dc:creator>KingGyu</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/kinggyusuh/open-sourcing-my-personal-ai-agent-harness-for-production-harness-loom-3mob</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/kinggyusuh/open-sourcing-my-personal-ai-agent-harness-for-production-harness-loom-3mob</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been poking at a bunch of AI agent frameworks and coding tools this past year. For personal projects, I often just use Hermes Agent or something similar because it's fast and saves tokens.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But honestly? When I actually have to ship something for &lt;strong&gt;production&lt;/strong&gt;, I can't just use those raw agent setups. Between security compliance, instability, and the sheer complexity of real-world codebases, it’s just too risky.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For production, I keep going back to CLI tools like &lt;strong&gt;Claude Code, Codex, or Gemini CLI&lt;/strong&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why? Because in production:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Perfect &amp;gt; Fast:&lt;/strong&gt; I'd rather it take longer but be absolutely correct and secure.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Traceability &amp;amp; Long Plans:&lt;/strong&gt; I need to track the exact progress of long-running plans without having to baby-sit it or intervene constantly.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Consistent Quality:&lt;/strong&gt; No matter which team member kicks off the task, the output quality and adherence to our repo's standards need to be exactly the same.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And I realized the way to achieve this isn't by finding a magical new model. It's by &lt;strong&gt;tuning the harness&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;These CLIs (Claude, Codex, Gemini) already give you a pretty solid baseline harness for free (planners, hooks, auto mode, skills). But that baseline has no idea what &lt;em&gt;my&lt;/em&gt; specific repo cares about. It doesn't know my team's review rules, what "Done" looks like for us, or what artifacts we need to persist.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, I started focusing on &lt;strong&gt;Harness Fine-Tuning&lt;/strong&gt;—writing my team's specific review rules, producer/reviewer pairs, and task shapes into actual version-controlled files, rather than trying to re-explain them in a prompt every single session.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I've finally open-sourced my personal harness setup: &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://github.com/KingGyuSuh/harness-loom" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;harness-loom&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It’s not another agent framework. It sits &lt;em&gt;on top&lt;/em&gt; of whatever harness your CLI already ships and lets you shape it to fit your production repo. You define your rules in one canonical place (&lt;code&gt;.harness/loom/&lt;/code&gt;), and it derives the specific configs for Claude, Codex, or Gemini.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I’m still in the process of porting over all the specific features from my private setup into the open-source repo, but the core factory is there and ready to use. I'll be updating it quickly!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you are trying to use AI assistants for serious production work and want them to act more like a predictable system rather than a one-off chat, I'd love for you to poke at it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;🔗 &lt;strong&gt;GitHub Repo:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="https://github.com/KingGyuSuh/harness-loom" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;harness-loom&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Has anyone else felt the need to shift from "prompt engineering" to "harness engineering" for production work?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>agents</category>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>opensource</category>
      <category>tooling</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
