<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Eric Robles</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Eric Robles (@knwoledgeekza_3224).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/knwoledgeekza_3224</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/knwoledgeekza_3224"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>We Executed Governed Quantum State Transitions on Real IBM Hardware — Here Is the Evidence</title>
      <dc:creator>Eric Robles</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 06:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/knwoledgeekza_3224/we-executed-governed-quantum-state-transitions-on-real-ibm-hardware-here-is-the-evidence-3851</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/knwoledgeekza_3224/we-executed-governed-quantum-state-transitions-on-real-ibm-hardware-here-is-the-evidence-3851</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;We Executed SCQOS Governance Across Real IBM Quantum Hardware&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Today SCQOS crossed another boundary: governance was carried from authorization through real physical execution on IBM Quantum hardware and back into durable, remotely verified evidence. A completed workload executed on ibm_marrakesh under IBM Job da0jklv2sl0c73bn5ls0, returned DONE, and its consequence was preserved as a SHA-256-addressed evidence package, committed to Git, pushed to GitHub, retrieved from the remote, and verified with LOCAL == REMOTE.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The deeper point is not “we ran quantum code.” Authorization alone does not prove consequence. SCQOS governs the transition itself: evidence, authority, execution, consequence, receipt, and continuity. If any required boundary fails, the architecture is designed to fail closed rather than manufacture a successful state. The same primitive applies whether the consequence is an AI tool call, cloud mutation, database write, deployment, or physical quantum execution.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That gives us something more useful than another governance claim: a falsifiable public evidence chain. Break the reference, inject stale evidence, create an authority mismatch, corrupt the receipt, or demonstrate a transition that crossed a forbidden boundary. The implementation is public specifically so people can try.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Nothing Executes Until It Proves Itself.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;SCQOS reference implementation and evidence⁠￼&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>quantumcomputing</category>
      <category>security</category>
      <category>devops</category>
      <category>opensource</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
