<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Kumar Shivam</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Kumar Shivam (@kshivam99_).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/kshivam99_</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/kshivam99_"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Engineering Notes #1 — AI Isn't Replacing Programming Languages</title>
      <dc:creator>Kumar Shivam</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 07:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/kshivam99_/engineering-notes-1-ai-isnt-replacing-programming-languages-30al</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/kshivam99_/engineering-notes-1-ai-isnt-replacing-programming-languages-30al</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;AI Isn't Replacing Programming Languages. It's Replacing the Need to Think in Them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;code&gt;Disclaimer: This isn't a prediction backed by research papers, market analysis, or insider information. It's just an observation that my brain decided to compile sometime around 2 AM after an unhealthy amount of caffeine. The kind of thought overthinkers accidentally git commit into their consciousness.&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One thing that's been stuck in my head lately is this:&lt;br&gt;
Everyone says AI is changing software development because it writes code.&lt;br&gt;
I don't think that's the real shift.&lt;br&gt;
I think AI is simply adding nitro to a journey we've been on for decades.&lt;br&gt;
Software development has always been moving from imperative to declarative.&lt;br&gt;
Remember when React became popular?&lt;br&gt;
Before React, building UIs often meant telling the browser how to update everything.&lt;br&gt;
Create this.&lt;br&gt;
Append that.&lt;br&gt;
Remove this.&lt;br&gt;
Update the DOM.&lt;br&gt;
Pray nothing breaks.Then React came along and said,&lt;br&gt;
"Just tell me what the UI should look like. I'll figure out the rest."That wasn't just another JavaScript library. It was a new way of thinking.&lt;br&gt;
And now AI is pushing that same idea one level higher.&lt;br&gt;
Instead of saying,&lt;br&gt;
"Here's how to implement authentication in TypeScript."We're saying,&lt;br&gt;
"Build me a secure authentication system with OAuth, MFA, audit logs, and make it scalable."Notice something?&lt;br&gt;
There's no programming language in that sentence.&lt;br&gt;
No framework.&lt;br&gt;
No syntax.&lt;br&gt;
Just intent.&lt;br&gt;
That's why I think English isn't replacing JavaScript.&lt;br&gt;
It's replacing the need to think in JavaScript.&lt;br&gt;
Programming languages become implementation details.&lt;br&gt;
Imagine asking an AI,&lt;br&gt;
Build a high-frequency trading engine.It might decide:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Rust for performance&lt;br&gt;
Go for networking&lt;br&gt;
TypeScript for the dashboard&lt;br&gt;
Python for analytics&lt;br&gt;
...without you ever caring.&lt;br&gt;
Kind of how you don't think about assembly every time you write a React component.&lt;br&gt;
Which leads me to another thought...&lt;br&gt;
Maybe we're watching the slow death of the "language specialist."&lt;br&gt;
Ten years ago people proudly introduced themselves as:&lt;br&gt;
"I'm a Java Developer."or&lt;br&gt;
"I'm a Python Engineer."Will people still do that ten years from now?&lt;br&gt;
Or will they simply say,&lt;br&gt;
"I'm a software engineer."Because AI handles the translation.&lt;br&gt;
The value shifts from writing syntax to designing systems.&lt;br&gt;
From remembering APIs to defining constraints.&lt;br&gt;
From debugging semicolons to debugging ideas.&lt;br&gt;
(Although let's be honest... we'll probably still spend an hour debugging because one config file was in YAML instead of JSON.)&lt;br&gt;
I don't think coding disappears.&lt;br&gt;
I think translation disappears.&lt;br&gt;
Today our job often looks like this:&lt;br&gt;
Idea → Brain → Programming Language → Compiler → Software&lt;br&gt;
Tomorrow it might look like:&lt;br&gt;
Idea → AI → Software&lt;br&gt;
Which means the difficult part isn't writing code anymore.&lt;br&gt;
It's knowing what to build.&lt;br&gt;
How it should behave.&lt;br&gt;
What trade-offs to make.&lt;br&gt;
Where the edge cases are.&lt;br&gt;
Ironically, software engineering might become... more engineering.&lt;br&gt;
Less typing.&lt;br&gt;
More thinking.&lt;br&gt;
Less syntax.&lt;br&gt;
More systems.&lt;br&gt;
Less "How do I write this?"&lt;br&gt;
More "Should this even exist?"&lt;br&gt;
Maybe that's the real evolution.&lt;br&gt;
We've spent decades building higher abstractions.&lt;br&gt;
Assembly over machine code.&lt;br&gt;
C over assembly.&lt;br&gt;
Python over C.&lt;br&gt;
React over DOM manipulation.&lt;br&gt;
Infrastructure as Code over shell scripts.&lt;br&gt;
AI doesn't break that trend.&lt;br&gt;
It accelerates it.&lt;br&gt;
If this thought ages terribly, feel free to quote-tweet this in five years and remind me.&lt;br&gt;
If it ages well...&lt;br&gt;
I reserve the right to pretend this was obvious all along.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
