<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Kuh4ku</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Kuh4ku (@kuh4ku).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/kuh4ku</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/kuh4ku"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>You don't own your reading list. You rent it.</title>
      <dc:creator>Kuh4ku</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 03:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/kuh4ku/you-dont-own-your-reading-list-you-rent-it-2056</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/kuh4ku/you-dont-own-your-reading-list-you-rent-it-2056</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Here is an uncomfortable one: you do not own your reading list. You rent it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Every "follow" button you have pressed in the last decade put your reading relationship inside a company's database, where it can be ranked, throttled, or ended the day the business model changes. You did not sign anything. You just stopped owning it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It was not always like this. Feeds were the quiet machinery that kept the web interoperable. RSS and Atom meant a site, a reader, and a robot could all agree on the same stream without asking anyone's permission. You published once, and anything could read it: whatever app, whatever order, no algorithm in the middle.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Then it eroded. Plenty of sites ship no feed at all now, and "follow us" quietly became "create an account on someone else's platform."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The reason is not mysterious. Platforms had every incentive to close the loop, because &lt;strong&gt;a feed lets you leave, and an account does not.&lt;/strong&gt; So the industry swapped "here is my stream, read it however you like" for "log in to see updates," and a generation of sites simply stopped publishing feeds, because the platform was where the audience was.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That is the trade you made without noticing. The open format that asked nothing of you got replaced by a login that asks for everything. Your reading list used to live in your reader and survive a company changing its mind, its ranking, or its whole business. Now it lives in their database and survives exactly as long as they allow.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Getting it back is not nostalgia. It is infrastructure for independence: tooling that treats feeds as a first-class citizen, aggregates the sources you actually choose, and keeps that stream under your control instead of a platform's.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The full case for why this is worth fixing, and what feed-first tooling looks like, is here: &lt;a href="https://mederic.me/blog/open-web-feeds" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://mederic.me/blog/open-web-feeds&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, honestly: how many of the people and sites you follow could you still read tomorrow if the platform in the middle disappeared tonight?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>webdev</category>
      <category>opensource</category>
      <category>discuss</category>
      <category>rss</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
