<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: lakshnaa</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by lakshnaa (@lakshhnaa).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/lakshhnaa</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/lakshhnaa"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>The 4µs Tax Hidden Inside Your Order Router</title>
      <dc:creator>lakshnaa</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 18:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/lakshhnaa/the-4us-tax-hidden-inside-your-order-router-a54</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/lakshhnaa/the-4us-tax-hidden-inside-your-order-router-a54</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Most engineers optimize for average latency.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Markets don't.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fht2bnbn4d6d6660a4tvj.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fht2bnbn4d6d6660a4tvj.png" alt="cpu and fpga comparison" width="800" height="582"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In HFT, the difference between winning and losing often lives in the p99.9, where cache misses, scheduler jitter, and interrupts turn an 800ns path into a 4µs one.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And once you've exhausted kernel bypass, huge pages, and CPU pinning, you're no longer fighting software.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You're fighting the CPU itself.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fdv9gywl2n2gml5g8izw9.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fdv9gywl2n2gml5g8izw9.png" alt="servers" width="635" height="428"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That's where FPGAs enter the picture.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Instead of executing instructions one after another, they execute pipelines.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Market data parsing, order book updates, signal evaluation, and order generation all happen simultaneously. Every stage consumes a clock cycle. Every cycle is deterministic.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No scheduler.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No context switches.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No branch prediction.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just logic switching at hundreds of megahertz.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ironically, achieving sub-microsecond latency isn't the hardest part.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Iteration is.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A software engineer can deploy ten times a day.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;An FPGA engineer may spend four hours waiting for synthesis and place-and-route before discovering a timing violation.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At that level, the bottleneck shifts from nanoseconds to engineering productivity.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And that's what makes FPGA trading systems fascinating.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;By the time you're chasing the last few microseconds, you're no longer optimizing code.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You're optimizing physics.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>hardwareengineering</category>
      <category>architecture</category>
      <category>hft</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
