<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: LedgerProve</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by LedgerProve (@ledgerprove).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/ledgerprove</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/ledgerprove"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>"CycloneDX vs SPDX: Which SBOM Format Should You Use?"</title>
      <dc:creator>LedgerProve</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 18:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/ledgerprove/cyclonedx-vs-spdx-which-sbom-format-should-you-use-3jbm</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/ledgerprove/cyclonedx-vs-spdx-which-sbom-format-should-you-use-3jbm</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;"Both formats are valid. Both satisfy regulators. The right choice depends on your tooling, your buyers, and your audit posture. A practical comparison."&lt;br&gt;
canonical_url: &lt;a href="https://ledgerprove.com/blog/cyclonedx-vs-spdx-which-sbom-format" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://ledgerprove.com/blog/cyclonedx-vs-spdx-which-sbom-format&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>sbom</category>
      <category>security</category>
      <category>devops</category>
      <category>supplychain</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
