<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: live-direct-marketing</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by live-direct-marketing (@livedirectmarketing).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/livedirectmarketing</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/livedirectmarketing"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>How I Built a Free Inbox Placement Test with Node.js and SSE</title>
      <dc:creator>live-direct-marketing</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 22:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/livedirectmarketing/how-i-built-a-free-inbox-placement-test-with-nodejs-and-sse-11gc</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/livedirectmarketing/how-i-built-a-free-inbox-placement-test-with-nodejs-and-sse-11gc</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The Problem
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I've been doing B2B cold outreach for 5+ years. The #1 blind spot? ESPs confirm SMTP delivery — status 250, "message accepted." But they never tell you which folder your email actually landed in.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your campaign could have a 0% open rate not because of bad copy, but because every email is sitting in Spam. And you'd never know.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The Solution
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I built a free tool that answers one question: &lt;strong&gt;did my email hit Inbox, Spam, or Promotions?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Try it here: &lt;a href="https://check.live-direct-marketing.online/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://check.live-direct-marketing.online/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  How It Works
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;You enter your email address&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;You get 5-7 seed addresses across Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo, Mail.ru, and Yandex&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;You send your test email from your real mailing system&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Results stream in live — placement per provider + full authentication report&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  Tech Stack
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Backend:&lt;/strong&gt; Node.js&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Live updates:&lt;/strong&gt; Server-Sent Events (SSE) — lightweight, no WebSocket overhead&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Folder detection:&lt;/strong&gt; IMAP connection to seed mailboxes, parsing folder placement&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Authentication parsing:&lt;/strong&gt; SPF, DKIM, DMARC results extracted from email headers&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Frontend:&lt;/strong&gt; Vanilla JS, no framework — keeps it fast&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  Why SSE over WebSocket?
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For this use case SSE is a better fit. The data flows one direction: server → client. No need for bidirectional communication. SSE auto-reconnects, works through proxies, and is dead simple to implement:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="highlight js-code-highlight"&gt;
&lt;pre class="highlight javascript"&gt;&lt;code&gt;&lt;span class="kd"&gt;const&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="nx"&gt;evtSource&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="o"&gt;=&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="k"&gt;new&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="nc"&gt;EventSource&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;(&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="dl"&gt;'&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="s1"&gt;/api/test/stream?id=&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="dl"&gt;'&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="o"&gt;+&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="nx"&gt;testId&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;);&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class="nx"&gt;evtSource&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="nx"&gt;onmessage&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="o"&gt;=&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="p"&gt;(&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="nx"&gt;e&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;)&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="o"&gt;=&amp;gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="p"&gt;{&lt;/span&gt;
  &lt;span class="kd"&gt;const&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="nx"&gt;result&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="o"&gt;=&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="nx"&gt;JSON&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="nf"&gt;parse&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;(&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="nx"&gt;e&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="nx"&gt;data&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;);&lt;/span&gt;
  &lt;span class="nf"&gt;updateUI&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;(&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="nx"&gt;result&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;);&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class="p"&gt;};&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;



&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  IMAP Folder Detection
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The core logic connects to each seed mailbox via IMAP, searches for the test email by Message-ID, and checks which folder it landed in:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;INBOX → your email is fine&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;[Gmail]/Spam, Junk, etc. → problem with reputation or authentication&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;[Gmail]/Promotions → not critical, but reduces visibility&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  Authentication Breakdown
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Every incoming email has authentication headers. The tool parses them and gives you a clear SPF/DKIM/DMARC status — pass, fail, or missing. This is usually the first thing to fix if you're landing in Spam.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  What I Learned
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Mail.ru and Yandex matter&lt;/strong&gt; if you target CIS markets. Most tools ignore them.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;SPF/DKIM/DMARC issues&lt;/strong&gt; are the #1 reason emails land in Spam — not content, not subject lines.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Live results&lt;/strong&gt; (SSE) make a huge UX difference vs "check back in 5 minutes."&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Try It
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Free, no signup, no credit card: &lt;a href="https://check.live-direct-marketing.online/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://check.live-direct-marketing.online/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Feedback welcome — what providers or features should I add next?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>email</category>
      <category>deliverability</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
      <category>opensource</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
