<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Henrik Andersen</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Henrik Andersen (@loweringproofs).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/loweringproofs</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/loweringproofs"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Would publicly disclosing a psychopathy diagnosis affect how you viewed a developer's work?</title>
      <dc:creator>Henrik Andersen</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 22:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/loweringproofs/would-publicly-disclosing-a-psychopathy-diagnosis-affect-how-you-viewed-a-developers-work-5e3b</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/loweringproofs/would-publicly-disclosing-a-psychopathy-diagnosis-affect-how-you-viewed-a-developers-work-5e3b</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I'm an independent developer working on programming languages, compilers, formal methods, static analysis and software security.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm considering publicly disclosing that I have been diagnosed with psychopathy. Before making that decision, I'd like to understand how other developers would actually react to knowing this about someone whose technical work they encounter.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My main question is: would knowing about the diagnosis change how you evaluated the person's technical work?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For example, would it affect:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;how seriously you took their programming-language or compiler research;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;your willingness to collaborate with them;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;your willingness to use software they developed;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;how you interpreted their behaviour in an open-source project;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;or would you judge the work primarily from source code, reproducible tests, benchmarks, formal arguments and independent verification?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There is also a personal reason I'm considering disclosure. I went through a very difficult period involving psychiatry and trying to understand what was happening to me. I was fortunate to receive help from physics professors. Without the help I received, I don't think I would still be alive today.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That experience is one reason why being open about what happened matters to me. At the same time, I understand that once a diagnosis like this is publicly associated with someone's name and professional work, that association may be effectively permanent.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So I'm interested in candid answers, particularly from developers, researchers, security people and open-source contributors:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Would the disclosure itself change your view of the developer or their work? If so, in what way?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm not asking anyone here to assess the diagnosis or provide medical advice. I'm specifically interested in the professional and technical consequences of making such information public.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>discuss</category>
      <category>socialmedia</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
