<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Mukhtiar Ali</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Mukhtiar Ali (@mac1317).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/mac1317</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/mac1317"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>I Built a Free AdSense Audit Tool — Here's What It Actually Checks (And Why Most Sites Fail)</title>
      <dc:creator>Mukhtiar Ali</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 16:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/mac1317/i-built-a-free-adsense-audit-tool-heres-what-it-actually-checks-and-why-most-sites-fail-66n</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/mac1317/i-built-a-free-adsense-audit-tool-heres-what-it-actually-checks-and-why-most-sites-fail-66n</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If you've ever wondered why your AdSense application got rejected — or why your &lt;br&gt;
existing account keeps getting policy warnings — the answer is almost never "bad &lt;br&gt;
content." It's usually something invisible: a missing privacy policy, a &lt;br&gt;
misconfigured robots.txt, or a page structure that automated reviewers flag before &lt;br&gt;
a human ever looks at it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I ran into this problem with a client site. Clean content, decent traffic, but &lt;br&gt;
rejected twice. So I started auditing manually — crawling pages, checking headers, &lt;br&gt;
verifying policy pages, testing mobile rendering. After doing this a few times I &lt;br&gt;
built a tool to automate it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That tool is now live on ToolzPedia: &lt;a href="https://toolzpedia.com" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://toolzpedia.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here's what it actually checks.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  What the audit covers
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Crawlability&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
The tool checks whether your robots.txt is blocking Googlebot and the AdSense &lt;br&gt;
crawler. A lot of staging configs get pushed to production and lock out crawlers &lt;br&gt;
entirely — your site looks fine to humans but invisible to Google.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Privacy policy detection&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
AdSense requires a privacy policy that covers cookie usage and data collection. &lt;br&gt;
The audit scans your footer links and page content for a valid privacy policy URL. &lt;br&gt;
Linking to a generic template on a third-party domain usually fails this check.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Content quality signals&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Thin pages, doorway-style URL structures, and low word counts are all flagged. &lt;br&gt;
The tool estimates content density per page so you can see where you're below &lt;br&gt;
the threshold before Google does.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;HTTPS and security headers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Running on HTTP in 2025 is an automatic rejection. The audit also checks for &lt;br&gt;
basic security headers since some reviewers now flag their absence as a trust signal.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mobile usability&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
AdSense policy has tightened on mobile experience. The audit checks viewport &lt;br&gt;
meta tags and basic responsive structure.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ad placement rules&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
If you already have ads running, the tool checks for known placement violations — &lt;br&gt;
ads too close to navigation, ads inside article tags that push content below the &lt;br&gt;
fold, and interstitial-style placements on mobile.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Why most sites fail
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In my experience auditing sites, the three most common rejection reasons are:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Privacy policy either missing or not linked from every page&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;robots.txt accidentally blocking the AdSense crawler&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Content that's technically original but too thin per-page (under ~300 words)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;None of these are hard to fix. They're just invisible without a structured audit.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  How the tool works
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It's a Node.js crawler running on a VPS, with a PHP front-end. You enter your &lt;br&gt;
URL, the crawler fetches your pages and runs them through a set of checks, and &lt;br&gt;
you get a scored report with specific fixes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Free accounts get a one-time audit. If you want to run it monthly or track &lt;br&gt;
changes over time, there's a paid tier.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Try it
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The tool is free to use: &lt;a href="https://toolzpedia.com/tools/seo/adsense-audit/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://toolzpedia.com/tools/seo/adsense-audit/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you find something wrong with the audit results or have a site it doesn't &lt;br&gt;
handle well, drop it in the comments — I'm still actively improving the checks.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>webdev</category>
      <category>seo</category>
      <category>javascript</category>
      <category>showdev</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
