<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Mack Rocher</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Mack Rocher (@mack_rocher_7c88b4e8a889d).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/mack_rocher_7c88b4e8a889d</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/mack_rocher_7c88b4e8a889d"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Why I keep coming back to Django + htmx (even though everyone says use React)</title>
      <dc:creator>Mack Rocher</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 05:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/mack_rocher_7c88b4e8a889d/why-i-keep-coming-back-to-django-htmx-even-though-everyone-says-use-react-167g</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/mack_rocher_7c88b4e8a889d/why-i-keep-coming-back-to-django-htmx-even-though-everyone-says-use-react-167g</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Been reading a lot of these "why do you use X stack" threads lately, and figured I'd throw my own experience in.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I started out doing the typical thing — Django backend, React frontend, separate API, the whole SPA setup. It worked, but honestly? For most of the projects I actually ship (small business tools, internal dashboards, the occasional client site), it felt like massive overkill. I was spending more time managing state between two codebases than actually building features.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;About a year ago I switched to Django + htmx for anything that isn't a genuinely complex frontend, and it's honestly been kind of a relief. No build step, no juggling two deploy pipelines, no "wait why is this data stale on the client." Django just renders the HTML, htmx swaps it in, done. It feels a bit like going back in time, but in a good way — less moving parts, less debugging surface area.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I still reach for a proper JS framework when a project actually needs rich client-side interactivity (like a drag-and-drop builder I did last year — htmx would've been painful for that). But I've noticed I default to "do I really need a SPA for this?" before reaching for React now, and the answer is "no" way more often than I expected.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Curious if anyone else has gone the "boring tech" route on purpose, or if you tried it and went back?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>backend</category>
      <category>django</category>
      <category>python</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
