<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Mahender Pratap</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Mahender Pratap (@mahenderpratap).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/mahenderpratap</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/mahenderpratap"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Building a C++ Logical Bug Detection Benchmark on Kaggle: Testing 3 AI Models</title>
      <dc:creator>Mahender Pratap</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 14:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/mahenderpratap/building-a-c-logical-bug-detection-benchmark-on-kaggle-testing-3-ai-models-1nfn</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/mahenderpratap/building-a-c-logical-bug-detection-benchmark-on-kaggle-testing-3-ai-models-1nfn</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This is a submission for the &lt;a href="https://dev.to/challenges/kaggle-2026-09-23"&gt;Kaggle Benchmarking Challenge&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Introduction
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As a C++ learner, I wanted to explore how well AI models can identify common logical errors in code and suggest appropriate fixes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For the DEV × Kaggle Benchmarking Challenge, I created a small benchmark on Kaggle called &lt;strong&gt;C++ Logical Bug Detection Benchmark&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The goal is to test whether AI models can recognize common programming mistakes, explain why they occur, and suggest corrections.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  What Does the Benchmark Test?
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The benchmark contains three tasks:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  1. Sum Accumulator
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This task checks whether a model can identify incorrect variable usage in a summation loop and suggest the correct fix.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  2. Off-by-One Error Detection
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This task evaluates whether a model can identify incorrect loop boundaries and indexing that may cause an off-by-one error.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  3. Array Indexing Error Detection
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This task checks whether a model can detect incorrect array index usage and explain how to correct it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  AI Models Tested
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I tested three AI models:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Qwen 3 Coder 480B&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;GPT-5.4 mini&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Gemini 3.7 Flash&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I selected these models to compare how different AI systems handle simple C++ logical bug-detection tasks.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Results
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;All three models achieved a score of &lt;strong&gt;100.00&lt;/strong&gt; on the benchmark.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="table-wrapper-paragraph"&gt;&lt;table&gt;
&lt;thead&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Model&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Score&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/thead&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Qwen 3 Coder 480B&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;100.00&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;GPT-5.4 mini&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;100.00&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Gemini 3.7 Flash&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;100.00&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;All three models passed the three tasks, giving a total of &lt;strong&gt;9 successful model-task evaluations out of 9&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Key Findings and Limitations
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The results show that all three models handled the three simple bug-detection tasks successfully.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However, this is a small benchmark with only three tasks. It does not establish how well these models perform on complex C++ debugging, large codebases, or real-world software projects.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In the future, I would like to expand the benchmark with more challenging logical errors, nested loops, pointer-related bugs, and edge cases.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  What I Learned
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Building this benchmark helped me understand how AI models can be evaluated using specific programming tasks and measurable results.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It also encouraged me to think about how to design better tests that go beyond simple examples.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Try the Benchmark
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You can explore my benchmark here:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.kaggle.com/benchmarks/mahenderprataps/cpp-logical-bug-detection-benchmark" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;C++ Logical Bug Detection Benchmark on Kaggle&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I would appreciate feedback and suggestions for adding more challenging C++ debugging tasks.&lt;/p&gt;




</description>
      <category>kagglechallenge</category>
      <category>devchallenge</category>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>machinelearning</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
