<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Manoj Ramakrishnan</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Manoj Ramakrishnan (@manoj_ramakrishnan_bb6b41).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/manoj_ramakrishnan_bb6b41</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/manoj_ramakrishnan_bb6b41"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>What Staff Engineers Actually Do (and Why It’s Not Just About Code)</title>
      <dc:creator>Manoj Ramakrishnan</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2025 13:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/manoj_ramakrishnan_bb6b41/what-staff-engineers-actually-do-and-why-its-not-just-about-code-ap0</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/manoj_ramakrishnan_bb6b41/what-staff-engineers-actually-do-and-why-its-not-just-about-code-ap0</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been writing a series on strategic thinking for Staff Engineers — here are 3 posts on technical debt, stakeholder influence, and prioritization frameworks.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;What Staff Engineers Actually Do&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt; I’ve worked in Staff/Principal roles for several years, and I put together a post on what the role actually looks like — not just the IC coding side, but the trade-offs, org influence, and expectation mismatches across EMs, peers, and skip levels.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I also included a conversation-style debrief between an EM and a Senior Engineer on how they view the same Staff+ candidate differently.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Curious how this aligns (or doesn’t) with others’ experience.&lt;br&gt;
👉 &lt;a href="https://medium.com/@formanojr/what-staff-engineers-actually-do-and-why-its-not-just-code-b535254e8eaa" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://medium.com/@formanojr/what-staff-engineers-actually-do-and-why-its-not-just-code-b535254e8eaa&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
2.** A Framework for Prioritizing Tech Debt (From a Staff Engineer's Perspective)**&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The post includes:&lt;br&gt;
_&lt;br&gt;
A framework to evaluate effort vs payoff&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A matrix to help plan Quick Wins vs Strategic Investments&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;How to tag and document debt during design_&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is based on real decisions around MVPs, scale, and cost trade-offs. Would love feedback or to hear how other teams track tech debt.&lt;br&gt;
👉 &lt;a href="https://medium.com/staff-thinking/strategic-thinking-for-staff-engineers-making-the-case-for-or-against-tech-debt-c17186bfb307" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://medium.com/staff-thinking/strategic-thinking-for-staff-engineers-making-the-case-for-or-against-tech-debt-c17186bfb307&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>softwareengineering</category>
      <category>careerdevelopment</category>
      <category>techlead</category>
      <category>architecture</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
