<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Marco Caciotti</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Marco Caciotti (@marcocaciotti).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/marcocaciotti</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/marcocaciotti"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Is your site ready to be cited by AI? A practical intro to GEO (Generative Engine Optimization)</title>
      <dc:creator>Marco Caciotti</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 23:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/marcocaciotti/is-your-site-ready-to-be-cited-by-ai-a-practical-intro-to-geo-generative-engine-optimization-m3m</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/marcocaciotti/is-your-site-ready-to-be-cited-by-ai-a-practical-intro-to-geo-generative-engine-optimization-m3m</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;More and more people search on ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini. Being found is no longer enough — you need to be cited.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For twenty years SEO had one clear goal: rank in Google's top results. Something deeper is changing now. A growing share of people, before buying or choosing a supplier, no longer open Google — they ask ChatGPT, Perplexity or Gemini. And to answer, these models cite some sources and ignore others.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So the question for anyone with a website becomes different: is my site among the sources AI can read and cite? That's what GEO — Generative Engine Optimization — is about.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The good news: GEO isn't magic. It rests on concrete, verifiable signals.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  1. Can AI crawlers reach your site?
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity use dedicated crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended). If your &lt;code&gt;robots.txt&lt;/code&gt; blocks them — often by mistake or an old setting — AI can't read you, so it can't cite you. That's the first thing to check.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  2. Do you have an llms.txt file?
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It's a simple file, modeled on &lt;code&gt;robots.txt&lt;/code&gt;, that tells AI which content is most relevant to read. Still uncommon, but becoming a standard: adopting it now is an early-mover advantage.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  3. Is your content "extractable"?
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;AI reuses structured content better: a single clear H1, subheadings, lists, direct answers, structured data (JSON-LD). A wall of undifferentiated text is hard to cite; a well-isolated answer isn't.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  4. The technical basics
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;HTTPS, descriptive title and meta description, indexable pages. Nothing new versus classic SEO, but still prerequisites.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Where to start
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The fastest way to know where you stand is to measure. We published a free audit that checks these signals in seconds and returns an "AI-readiness" score, no signup to see the result: &lt;a href="https://seoautohub.com/audit-geo" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://seoautohub.com/audit-geo&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;SEO isn't dying, it's widening: beyond ranking on Google, being readable and citable by generative engines now matters. Those who move now — while the standard is still immature — gain an edge that will be far more expensive to win a year from now.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>seo</category>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
      <category>marketing</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
