<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Mariano Martene</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Mariano Martene (@mariano_martene_5cb75456d).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/mariano_martene_5cb75456d</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/mariano_martene_5cb75456d"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Running an engineering process without being an engineer</title>
      <dc:creator>Mariano Martene</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/mariano_martene_5cb75456d/running-an-engineering-process-without-being-an-engineer-5edn</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/mariano_martene_5cb75456d/running-an-engineering-process-without-being-an-engineer-5edn</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1&gt;
  
  
  From GTM to Software Engineering: Borrowing Process Over Models
&lt;/h1&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm not a software engineer. My background is GTM. So now I'm a &lt;a href="https://marianomartene.com/gtm-engineer/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;GTM Engineer&lt;/a&gt; I guess. I've spent years helping SaaS founders figure out how to get from founder-led execution to scalable growth. Today, though, I see GTM more as a code problem and spend a surprising amount of time shipping software.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Cloudflare Workers&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Internal tools
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Lead scoring systems&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Client microsites with databases behind them&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The most interesting concept to borrow was the &lt;strong&gt;engineering process&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Programming and engineering are different jobs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The Process Matters More Than the Model
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Everything I work on starts as a Linear issue.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Whether it's a GTM workflow, an internal tool, or a client feature, it goes through the same pipeline:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="highlight js-code-highlight"&gt;
&lt;pre class="highlight plaintext"&gt;&lt;code&gt;Backlog → Todo → In Progress → Review → Done
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;



&lt;p&gt;When an issue is ready, an orchestrator agent picks it up:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;One agent builds it&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Another reviews it&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;A third only deploys if the reviewer explicitly approves&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The interesting part isn't that there are three agents—it's that &lt;strong&gt;every stage leaves its reasoning behind&lt;/strong&gt;. Each handoff becomes a comment in Linear explaining what changed, what was tested, and what still looks risky. The ticket itself becomes the audit trail.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That completely changed how I work and pushed me toward separating everything into small tasks.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  Grilling Ideas Before Code
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I borrowed almost directly from Matt Pocock's workflow: grilling ideas before writing code. Since only 20% of my time is coding, I had to adapt it to work.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My flow looks like this:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;/grill-me&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; — Pushes back on every assumption, looks for missing requirements, edge cases, and contradictions&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;/to-prd&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; — Turns the conversation into a proper specification and publishes it as a &lt;strong&gt;checklist&lt;/strong&gt; of implementation tasks in Linear&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Code&lt;/strong&gt; — By the time an agent starts writing code, it's working from a document, not a prompt&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Checklists work exceptionally well for LLMs—they force the model not to skip steps.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This has probably improved quality more than switching models ever did.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Frontier Models Should Make Decisions
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Reserve expensive thinking for Claude Code:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Orchestration&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Architecture decisions&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Code review
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Business logic&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Anything where judgment matters&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Everything else runs on open models:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Bulk enrichment&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Classification&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Scraping&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;High-volume work&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;These don't need frontier intelligence—they need throughput. Moving that work onto DeepSeek also let me remove a paid search API because agents could perform the same discovery directly.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Context is Infrastructure
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I stopped thinking about prompting as the important part. &lt;strong&gt;Most quality comes from context.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Everything important about my business lives inside the repository:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;code&gt;CLAUDE.md&lt;/code&gt; — Business rules&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Architecture notes&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Reference documentation&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Every new session starts with this context already loaded—lean and on-demand. That means I'm no longer explaining my business over and over. I'm onboarding agents the same way I'd onboard a new teammate, with core context and pointers to their systems (CRM, email, transcripts, etc.).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  How My Days Break Down
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;GTM work&lt;/strong&gt; — Lead sourcing, enrichment, ICP scoring, outbound systems&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Client software&lt;/strong&gt; — Small production apps, review microsites, internal tools&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Content&lt;/strong&gt; — LinkedIn posts, newsletters, articles&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Internal tooling&lt;/strong&gt; — Tools only I use&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Plumbing&lt;/strong&gt; — APIs, automations, integrations&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is a very different workflow from what I imagined AI-assisted development would look like a year ago.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Final Thoughts
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I still don't think of myself as a software engineer. But I also don't think that's the point anymore.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For me, the most interesting thing was that it gave me access to an engineering process. I'm curious whether other people without a traditional engineering background are converging on something similar.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What parts of software engineering have you borrowed? Which open models have earned your trust for high-volume work? My guess is that a lot of us are independently reinventing the same operating system.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>gtm</category>
      <category>productivity</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
