<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Masha Igra</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Masha Igra (@masha_igra).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/masha_igra</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/masha_igra"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Guiding AI with Quality Attributes: Returning to Architectural Basics</title>
      <dc:creator>Masha Igra</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 10:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/masha_igra/guiding-ai-with-quality-attributes-returning-to-architectural-basics-4c7n</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/masha_igra/guiding-ai-with-quality-attributes-returning-to-architectural-basics-4c7n</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;TL;DR:&lt;/strong&gt; Quality Attributes (often called Non-Functional Requirements) are the true drivers of software architecture. Without defining exactly how a system behaves — using measurable frameworks like Bass-style scenarios — AI coding agents will rapidly veer off the intended architectural path, inevitably leading to costly re-architectures. To govern these AI interactions effectively, you can leverage specific &lt;a href="https://github.com/igramasha/architecture_skills" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;agent skills for quality attributes and functional requirements&lt;/a&gt; to ensure your architecture quality.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fzw3z7bc8qs0j82gpum1j.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fzw3z7bc8qs0j82gpum1j.png" alt=" " width="800" height="463"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;Early in my career — long before the current wave of AI-assisted development — a product manager handed me a set of system requirements and declared they had “no non-functional requirements.”&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My response was straightforward: “Without them, I will build the system I want to build. It will likely follow the easiest path for development, but it won’t be what you actually need.”&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That alarmed him — and rightfully so.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In software architecture, &lt;strong&gt;capturing efficiency quality attributes&lt;/strong&gt; — often referred to as non-functional requirements (NFRs) — is arguably the most critical phase of system design. I prefer the term “Quality Attributes.” &lt;strong&gt;Architecture is fundamentally about defining the quality of a system&lt;/strong&gt;. The term “Non-Functional Requirement,” by contrast, focuses on what a system is not, rather than what it is.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  The Bass-Style Scenario Framework
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Effective Quality Attribute scenarios were well defined by L. Bass, M. Klein, and F. Bachmann, and they have been widely embraced by the architecture community.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;An effective quality scenario forces all stakeholders to think about measurable system attributes so the architectural solution can be objectively measured against the requirements.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fia513rr3es6fo5063uef.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fia513rr3es6fo5063uef.png" alt=" " width="800" height="370"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  Why Quality Attributes Matter Even More in the Age of AI
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With the rapid rise of agentic development and “vibe coding,” the traditional SDLC process is fundamentally shifting. As Google recently outlined in their piece on the new SDLC, human-to-AI handoffs are becoming the norm.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;During these conversations between humans and AI, explicitly captured architectural requirements become hyper-critical. Large Language Models (LLMs) and coding agents will take the path of least resistance if boundaries aren’t clearly defined.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To bridge this gap, &lt;strong&gt;the requirement preparation and review phases&lt;/strong&gt; — whether conducted by a human or an &lt;strong&gt;AI agent&lt;/strong&gt; — &lt;strong&gt;must be enhanced&lt;/strong&gt;. &lt;strong&gt;AI agents can be guided to Create, Evaluate, and Fix well-structured quality-attribute scenarios using the Bass-style approach&lt;/strong&gt;. You can explore concrete implementations of these &lt;a href="https://github.com/igramasha/architecture_skills" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;agent skills for quality attributes and functional requirements&lt;/a&gt; on GitHub.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To read the full arcticle, please, follow the &lt;a href="https://mashaigra.hashnode.dev/guiding-ai-with-quality-attributes-returning-to-architectural-basics" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>architecture</category>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>agentskills</category>
      <category>systemdesign</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
