<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Max179</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Max179 (@max179).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/max179</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/max179"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Building a data-driven Clash Royale site: honest stats at small scale</title>
      <dc:creator>Max179</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 14:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/max179/building-a-data-driven-clash-royale-site-honest-stats-at-small-scale-3bfm</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/max179/building-a-data-driven-clash-royale-site-honest-stats-at-small-scale-3bfm</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I run &lt;a href="https://royalecards.com" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Royale Cards&lt;/a&gt;, a Clash Royale guide site. It's a small static site (Cloudflare Pages, generated from JSON + templates) with a simple promise: &lt;strong&gt;every stat shown is real and labeled with its sample size&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here's what I learned building it, in case it helps anyone working on niche data sites.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The problem with small data
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Clash Royale players constantly ask: &lt;em&gt;what deck is good right now?&lt;/em&gt; Existing sites show win rates, but most don't tell you how many battles the number is based on. On a quiet day, a card can have 12 recorded uses — a 75% win rate on 12 samples is noise, not a signal.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So the site has one hard rule: &lt;strong&gt;if fewer than 30 samples exist, no win rate is displayed.&lt;/strong&gt; Instead you get a "sample too small" note. It costs a bit of polish but earns a lot of trust, and it makes the data story defensible.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Pages that earn their keep
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Instead of one giant "all decks" page, every card gets its own URL: stats at all 14 levels, arena unlock, and the decks that best use it. That's ~133 card pages plus deck and guide pages — the whole sitemap is around 186 URLs. Each page is small and focused, which is what search engines (and tired players on mobile) actually want.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Season guides as content engines
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When a new season lands, players flood search with the same questions. The current &lt;a href="https://royalecards.com/guides/khaos-season-2026/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;K.H.A.O.S season guide&lt;/a&gt; covers the new Hero Valkyrie and Hero Berserker: what Supercell officially confirmed vs. what's editorial analysis, plus counterplay notes. We deliberately separate "official facts" from "our read" — readers can tell the difference.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  What I'd do differently
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Ship the sitemap + GSC submission on day one (we did, but later than I'd like)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Start collecting battle samples earlier; the sample-size gate is only useful once you have volume&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Write the "why" for every stat, not just the number&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you build niche data sites, the honest-stats angle is a real differentiator. Happy to answer questions about the stack.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>webdev</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
