<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: MemoraX AI</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by MemoraX AI (@memorax_ai).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/memorax_ai</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/memorax_ai"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>MemoraX AI at NeurIPS 2026: Ten Papers on Reliable Learning, Efficient Reasoning, and Long-Term Agent Memory</title>
      <dc:creator>MemoraX AI</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 07:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/memorax_ai/memorax-ai-at-neurips-2026-ten-papers-on-reliable-learning-efficient-reasoning-and-long-term-528a</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/memorax_ai/memorax-ai-at-neurips-2026-ten-papers-on-reliable-learning-efficient-reasoning-and-long-term-528a</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;We are excited to share that &lt;strong&gt;10 papers from MemoraX AI have been accepted to NeurIPS 2026&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;These papers cover a range of topics, including robust self-training, reinforcement learning, difficulty-aware reasoning, diffusion models, long-term Agent Memory, and the continuous evolution of AI systems.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Although the papers address different technical problems, they share a common research question:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How can AI systems learn from experience, use computation more effectively, and continue improving over time?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Beyond Bigger Models
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As AI systems become capable of handling longer and more complex tasks, simply increasing model size is no longer enough.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A capable AI system should also be able to:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;recognize when a problem requires deeper reasoning;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;learn from reliable experience rather than noisy feedback;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;avoid repeating failed strategies;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;align training improvements with real inference performance;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;retain and reuse useful information over long-running tasks.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This perspective guides much of MemoraX AI’s research.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Building More Robust Learning Systems
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One line of work focuses on improving the reliability of self-training for large language models.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In “Beyond Correctness: Robustness-Driven Evolutionary Self-Training for Large Language Models,” the authors study how correct solutions can be selected and evolved more reliably during training.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The central idea is that a useful solution should not only be correct once. It should also be robust, stable, and transferable to related problems.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The work introduces a robustness-driven evolutionary self-training framework that uses correctness feedback to guide the generation and selection of new solution trajectories. This helps the model learn from high-quality reasoning paths while reducing the risk of overfitting to fragile solutions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F3pa7avzalkposlu14ujh.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F3pa7avzalkposlu14ujh.png" alt=" " width="799" height="420"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Aligning Training with Real Inference
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Another research direction studies the gap between training-time improvements and inference-time behavior.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In “The Mirage of Optimizing Training Policies: Monotonic Inference Policies as the Real Objective for LLM Reinforcement Learning,” the authors examine a common problem in reinforcement learning for language models: improving the training policy does not always lead to better behavior when the model is actually deployed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The paper introduces the idea of optimizing for monotonic inference policy improvement. Its proposed framework separates training-side updates from inference-side validation, allowing potentially harmful updates to be detected and rejected.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This line of research asks an important question:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are we optimizing the metric used during training, or are we truly improving the behavior users experience at inference time?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fbuf4uojan9wrpum03yo8.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fbuf4uojan9wrpum03yo8.png" alt=" " width="800" height="209"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Making Reasoning More Compute-Efficient
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;AI systems often spend the same amount of computation on problems with very different levels of difficulty.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;“Does Your Large Language Model Have an Intuitive Sense of the Difficulty of a Question?” investigates whether a model can estimate problem difficulty before committing to a reasoning strategy.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The work proposes a difficulty-perception mechanism that helps models dynamically select different reasoning intensities. Easier problems can be handled with a faster path, while harder problems receive additional computation.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This direction is especially important for practical AI systems, where accuracy and efficiency must be balanced. Better difficulty awareness can improve token efficiency without simply reducing the quality of responses.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Exploring New Policy Models for Reinforcement Learning
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;MemoraX AI also studies how diffusion models can be used in online reinforcement learning.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;“What Kind of Diffusion Models Do We Need in Online Reinforcement Learning?” explores the challenges of using diffusion policies in high-dimensional action spaces, including computational efficiency, expressiveness, and distribution coverage.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The paper introduces Coupled Flow, a structured approach designed to preserve expressive policy modeling while improving optimization efficiency.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This work contributes to a broader effort to understand how generative models can support more capable decision-making systems in complex environments.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Long-Term Agent Memory
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One of MemoraX AI’s central research areas is long-term Agent Memory.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As AI Agents move from short interactions to longer-running tasks, memory becomes more than a convenience. It becomes part of the system’s ability to learn from experience.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;An Agent working on a real software project may need to remember:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;why a particular architecture was chosen;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;which implementation paths have already failed;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;how a previous bug was fixed;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;which project rules are stable;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;how the team prefers to structure and review code.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is the motivation behind MemoraX Code, our long-term memory plugin for Coding Agents.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;MemoraX Code helps Coding Agents retain and reuse project context, historical decisions, debugging experience, failed approaches, verified fixes, and reusable development workflows.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It is designed to work with Coding Agents such as Codex, Claude Code, OpenCode, Trae, and WorkBuddy. The goal is not to replace a developer’s preferred Agent, but to help the Agent maintain continuity across long-running development work.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  From Research to Evaluation
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In addition to building memory systems, MemoraX AI is also working on how Agent Memory should be evaluated.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Through the Agent Memory Leaderboard, we are exploring an open and reproducible evaluation framework for comparing memory systems across different scenarios.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;These scenarios include:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;long conversations and cross-session history;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;coding memory and historical engineering experience;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;multimodal memory;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;factual recall and multi-hop reasoning;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;temporal understanding;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;personalization and rule following;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;memory governance and safe usage.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A shared evaluation framework can help researchers and developers move beyond vague claims and better understand what different memory systems can actually do.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Toward Continuously Evolving AI
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The ten accepted papers represent different parts of a larger research agenda.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Some focus on how models learn. Some study how they allocate computation. Others examine how policies improve during reinforcement learning or how Agents can retain useful experience over time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Together, they point toward a broader direction for AI development:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Future AI systems should not only generate answers. They should learn from experience, understand when to reason more deeply, reuse reliable knowledge, and improve continuously through interaction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At MemoraX AI, we are continuing to explore this direction through both fundamental research and practical systems such as MemoraX Code and Agent Memory Leaderboard.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We look forward to sharing more details about the accepted papers, released benchmarks, and open research projects in the coming weeks.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Learn More
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;MemoraX AI: &lt;a href="https://memorax.net/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Official Website&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;MemoraX Code: &lt;a href="https://code.memorax.net/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Product Website&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;GitHub: &lt;a href="https://github.com/memorax-ai" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;MemoraX AI on GitHub&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;h1&gt;
  
  
  ai #machinelearning #agents #reinforcementlearning #llm #opensource
&lt;/h1&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>opensource</category>
      <category>agents</category>
      <category>machinelearning</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
