<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Salman Mallick</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Salman Mallick (@mohammad_salman_mallick).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/mohammad_salman_mallick</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/mohammad_salman_mallick"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>A YouTuber Misunderstood My Product in Seconds and It Exposed a Serious UX Failure</title>
      <dc:creator>Salman Mallick</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 18:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/mohammad_salman_mallick/a-youtuber-misunderstood-my-product-in-seconds-and-it-exposed-a-serious-ux-failure-45b7</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/mohammad_salman_mallick/a-youtuber-misunderstood-my-product-in-seconds-and-it-exposed-a-serious-ux-failure-45b7</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Context
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There’s a YouTuber who reviews open-source websites.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
I have a site I wanted him to review. It’s &lt;strong&gt;freemium&lt;/strong&gt;, not fully open source. At first I hesitated, but then I thought: worst case, he just won’t review it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So I posted my site, clearly mentioning that it’s freemium, and shared a link to the community GitHub repo (used for discussions and issues).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  What happened
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My site is a &lt;strong&gt;blocks platform for React / Next.js&lt;/strong&gt;, built on top of &lt;strong&gt;shadcn/ui&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
It’s categorized to make navigation easier.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While reviewing, he navigated into nested levels. At the end, he clicked a card, which opened an &lt;strong&gt;image modal preview&lt;/strong&gt; of a block.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;He closed the modal and said something like:  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“This is just a screenshot. Don't have any code.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Even though there was a &lt;strong&gt;clear button that leads to the actual block page&lt;/strong&gt;, he didn’t explore further. He simply closed the site.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Moment of truth
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My first reaction was emotional:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
“How can he miss a button right in front of him?”&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But then reality hit.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I’ve spent months building this:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;categorized blocks for all sections
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;a page builder (can even be used for wireframing)
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;animation presets for quick implementation
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And yet, a first-time user completely misunderstood what the product even is.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That’s on the design. Not on him.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The mistake (I think)
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To actually reach the code, the current path is too deep:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;/blocks/category/section/block&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Which means the user has to make multiple correct clicks before they ever see anything real.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here’s what that flow looks like:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F0pqn0ny0kd3gkoy1dt7g.gif" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F0pqn0ny0kd3gkoy1dt7g.gif" alt="Flow" width="400" height="225"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;/blocks/category
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;/blocks/category/section
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;the cards are clickable in multiple ways.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
After two levels of clicking, users stop thinking. They click blindly. When a modal opened, he assumed that was the product.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Psychologically, he had already “decided” what the site was.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  What I’m questioning now
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Should code access be &lt;strong&gt;one click away&lt;/strong&gt; from the first screen?
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Should the modal even exist, or is it masking the real value?
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;How do you design so that &lt;strong&gt;misinterpretation is impossible&lt;/strong&gt;?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thank you for reading this far, to the end.&lt;br&gt;
I’d really like feedback from people who design dev tools or UX-heavy products.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>webdev</category>
      <category>design</category>
      <category>nextjs</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
