<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Mykyta Didichenko</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Mykyta Didichenko (@ndidichenko).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/ndidichenko</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/ndidichenko"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Trading fee calculator that shows costs in R (units of risk)</title>
      <dc:creator>Mykyta Didichenko</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 21:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/ndidichenko/trading-fee-calculator-that-shows-costs-in-r-units-of-risk-4c01</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/ndidichenko/trading-fee-calculator-that-shows-costs-in-r-units-of-risk-4c01</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Most &lt;strong&gt;trading fee calculators&lt;/strong&gt; show you two numbers: the dollar amount and the percentage of notional. Both are correct. Neither is useful.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here's the problem.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  Dollar-denominated fees hide the real cost
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Say you're trading Bitcoin perpetuals on Bybit. Taker fee is 0.055% each side. You buy $10,000 notional.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Entry fee: $5.50&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Exit fee: $5.50&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Round trip: $11.00&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Does that matter? Impossible to say without knowing one more number: how much are you risking on this trade?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If your stop is $200 away (2% of position), your risk is $200. The $11 fee is 5.5% of your risk. That's 0.055R — acceptable for most strategies.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If your stop is $50 away (0.5%), your risk is $50. The $11 fee is 22% of your risk. That's 0.22R. On a 1:2 trade, your effective R:R just became roughly 1:1.56. At 100 trades, you've given up 22R to the exchange.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Same fee, same position size, completely different impact depending on your actual risk.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  What R multiples expose
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The R multiple framework comes from Van Tharp's work on expectancy. 1R = your defined risk on a trade. A 1:2 trade means you risk 1R to make 2R.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When you express fees in R terms:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="highlight js-code-highlight"&gt;
&lt;pre class="highlight plaintext"&gt;&lt;code&gt;R_fee = round_trip_fee_dollars / risk_per_trade_dollars

Example:
- Account: $10,000
- Risk per trade: 1% = $100 (1R)
- Position: $5,000 notional
- Bybit taker both sides: 0.055% x 2 = 0.11% = $5.50
- R_fee = $5.50 / $100 = 0.055R
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;



&lt;p&gt;Now you can do expectancy math that actually means something:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="highlight js-code-highlight"&gt;
&lt;pre class="highlight plaintext"&gt;&lt;code&gt;Expected value per trade = (Win% × Avg_Win_R) - (Loss% × Avg_Loss_R) - R_fee

Example with 45% win rate, 1:2.2 R:R, 0.055R fee:
EV = (0.45 × 2.2) - (0.55 × 1.0) - 0.055
EV = 0.99 - 0.55 - 0.055
EV = 0.385R per trade
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;



&lt;p&gt;Without the fee term, you'd estimate 0.44R. Over 500 trades, that's the difference between 220R profit and 192.5R profit — a 12.5% overestimate from ignoring fees.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  Funding rates compound silently
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For crypto perpetuals, commission isn't the only cost. Funding rates charge (or pay) you every 8 hours based on your position size. Typical rate on BTC perps is 0.01%/8h when longs pay shorts.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you hold a $10,000 long for 3 days:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="highlight js-code-highlight"&gt;
&lt;pre class="highlight plaintext"&gt;&lt;code&gt;Funding periods = 3 days × 3 periods/day = 9 periods
Funding cost = $10,000 × 0.01% × 9 = $9.00
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;



&lt;p&gt;Add that to the $11 round-trip commission: total cost is $20. If your 1R is $100, that trade cost you 0.20R before it made a tick.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For swing traders holding positions 2-5 days, funding rate cost routinely exceeds commission cost. Most calculators either ignore it or show it as a separate, disconnected number.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  What I built
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The calculator at dtsystems.dev/tools/trading-fee-calculator lets you set:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Asset class (crypto spot, crypto perps, stocks, forex)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Exchange (Bybit, Binance, Hyperliquid, OKX, MEXC, Kraken, Coinbase, Bitget, IBKR, Schwab)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Position size and account size&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Risk per trade (dollars or percentage)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Maker vs. taker&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Hold time (for funding rate accumulation on perps)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Outputs: all costs in dollars AND as fractions of 1R.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Fee schedules are pre-loaded. I kept it static rather than pulling live exchange API data — the standard tier rates are accurate for most users, and live API integration adds a maintenance surface I didn't want for a free tool. I'll revisit that for a v2.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One thing it doesn't cover: slippage. For liquid pairs (BTC/ETH) at normal sizes, slippage is small. For mid-cap altcoins or larger size, slippage will exceed commission. That's a harder problem — it requires order book data or historical fill data — and it's on the roadmap.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  Who this is for
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The R multiple framing is most useful for directional traders: trend followers, momentum strategies, discretionary + automated hybrids. If you're market-making or running statistical arbitrage, you probably already think in basis points of notional, and this framing adds less value for you.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For everyone else running a strategy with defined entries, stops, and targets: knowing your fee overhead in R before you size a position changes how you think about minimum viable R:R for a given strategy.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Try it: &lt;a href="https://dtsystems.dev/tools/trading-fee-calculator" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://dtsystems.dev/tools/trading-fee-calculator&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you find edge cases or exchanges I'm missing, I'm happy to hear it. The fee config is straightforward to extend.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>trading</category>
      <category>quant</category>
      <category>algorithms</category>
      <category>python</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
