<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Olivier Pieksma</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Olivier Pieksma (@olivierbpmn).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/olivierbpmn</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/olivierbpmn"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Syntax to BPMN: can writing code be faster than drawing process diagrams?</title>
      <dc:creator>Olivier Pieksma</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 11:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/olivierbpmn/syntax-to-bpmn-can-writing-code-be-faster-than-drawing-process-diagrams-404a</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/olivierbpmn/syntax-to-bpmn-can-writing-code-be-faster-than-drawing-process-diagrams-404a</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;While working as a business process analyst, I often struggled to visualize processes during meetings with stakeholders. I usually took notes and converted them into BPMN diagrams afterward using drag-and-drop tools. This meant stakeholders couldn't immediately see or validate the process, often resulting in multiple iterations and additional meetings. There had to be a faster way. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;From an idea to a working tool&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I started looking for a tool that would allow me to create BPMN diagrams at the speed of conversation. When I couldn't find what I was looking for, I decided to experiment myself. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Since I enjoyed working with Python, I started developing a simple tool that could convert structured text into BPMN diagrams. Eventually, two developers joined me, and what started as a hobby project became something bigger. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We spent countless hours developing a modeling language that was both easy to learn and fast to write. And eventually, it worked! Every activity, decision, and connection we wrote was instantly converted into a visual BPMN diagram. That is why we called it Instant Process.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Making BPMN modeling faster&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Since our first version, we've continued improving the modeling experience. With autocomplete, keyboard shortcuts, and a modeling language designed for speed, users can now create even complex process diagrams in minutes. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The goal is simple: model processes at the speed of conversation, allowing stakeholders to immediately see, discuss, and validate what's being modeled. We've also added features for process management, collaboration, and AI-assisted process analysis. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What about AI and Drag-and-Drop?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Traditional drag-and-drop tools provide great visual flexibility, while AI-generated BPMN diagrams can save considerable time by quickly turning descriptions into initial models. Both are valuable approaches. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However, I personally like the control that syntax-based modeling provides. You define every activity, decision, and connection yourself, while the software automatically generates the diagram. This allows you to continuously adjust the process during a conversation without relying on AI to interpret your intentions or manually rearranging diagram elements. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What do you think?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Would you prefer creating BPMN diagrams using syntax, AI, or traditional drag-and-drop? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm curious to hear your experiences! If you'd like to try what we've built, check out &lt;a href="https://instantprocess.nl/en" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Instant Process&lt;/a&gt;. The basic version is free to use, also no signup is needed. &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>bpmn</category>
      <category>discuss</category>
      <category>programming</category>
      <category>productivity</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
