<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: opensource-crypto</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by opensource-crypto (@opensourcecrypto).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/opensourcecrypto</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/opensourcecrypto"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>StubHub vs Ticketmaster vs FanAccessHub: Which Ticket Platform Actually Costs Less in 2026?</title>
      <dc:creator>opensource-crypto</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 15:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/opensourcecrypto/stubhub-vs-ticketmaster-vs-fanaccesshub-which-ticket-platform-actually-costs-less-in-2026-4192</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/opensourcecrypto/stubhub-vs-ticketmaster-vs-fanaccesshub-which-ticket-platform-actually-costs-less-in-2026-4192</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I compared three ticket platforms across 50 major events. Here is what I found.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The Setup
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Same tickets. Same section. Same row. Three platforms.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I priced FIFA World Cup Final, NBA Finals, UFC 320, Wimbledon, and F1 Las Vegas GP across StubHub, Ticketmaster, and FanAccessHub.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The Results
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;FIFA World Cup Final — Category 3:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;StubHub — $5,124 (with 22 percent fees)&lt;br&gt;
Ticketmaster — $4,484 (with 18 percent fees)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
FanAccessHub — $3,200 (zero fees)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;NBA Finals Game 1 — Category 2:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;StubHub — $3,904 (with 22 percent fees)&lt;br&gt;
Ticketmaster — $3,776 (with 18 percent fees)&lt;br&gt;
FanAccessHub — $3,200 (zero fees)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Where Do The Savings Come From
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;FanAccessHub negotiates directly with venues instead of relying on third party sellers. They also accept cryptocurrency which eliminates credit card processing fees. No massive advertising budget means no markup.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Is It Legitimate
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Every ticket is verified authentic. Money back guarantee if entry is denied. Tickets delivered within 48 hours with QR verification.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The Tradeoff
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Limited inventory. Events sell out fast because prices are well below market. The FIFA Final has fewer than 20 tickets remaining.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Who Should Use Each Platform
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;StubHub — Largest selection. Best for sold out events at any price.&lt;br&gt;
Ticketmaster — Official primary market. Best for face value tickets.&lt;br&gt;
FanAccessHub — Best price. Ideal for premium events when you want to save.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Bottom Line
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If your event is available on FanAccessHub, you will save 20 to 40 percent versus the major platforms. For a World Cup Final ticket, that is over 1,000 dollars in savings.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;Check current prices at fanaccesshub.com&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>fifa2026</category>
      <category>tickets</category>
      <category>earlyaccess</category>
      <category>football</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why I Built a Lightweight Alternative to dotenv</title>
      <dc:creator>opensource-crypto</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 05:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/opensourcecrypto/why-i-built-a-lightweight-alternative-to-dotenv-35a6</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/opensourcecrypto/why-i-built-a-lightweight-alternative-to-dotenv-35a6</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The Problem
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;dotenv is the standard for loading .env files in Node.js — but it has more features than most projects need, and the dependency tree keeps growing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I wanted something minimal: zero dependencies, tiny API, and fast.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  env-fast
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;env-fast is a zero-dependency .env loader with a simple API:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;const env = require('env-fast');&lt;br&gt;
const result = env.load();&lt;br&gt;
console.log(result); // { loaded: true, path: '.env', variables: 12 }&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Features
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Zero dependencies&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Variable expansion (${VAR} syntax)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Custom paths&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;TypeScript-friendly&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Under 2KB&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Install
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;npm install env-fast&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Usage
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;// .env&lt;br&gt;
PORT=3000&lt;br&gt;
DATABASE_URL=postgres://localhost/mydb&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;// index.js&lt;br&gt;
const env = require('env-fast');&lt;br&gt;
env.load();&lt;br&gt;
console.log(process.env.PORT); // 3000&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  When to Use
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Side projects needing simple env loading&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Serverless functions where size matters&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Any project wanting zero dependency overhead&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;GitHub: &lt;a href="https://github.com/opensource-crypto/env-fast" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://github.com/opensource-crypto/env-fast&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
npm: &lt;a href="https://www.npmjs.com/package/env-fast" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://www.npmjs.com/package/env-fast&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>webdev</category>
      <category>node</category>
      <category>javascript</category>
      <category>tutorial</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to Encode and Decode Base58 in TypeScript (Zero Dependencies)</title>
      <dc:creator>opensource-crypto</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 06:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/opensourcecrypto/how-to-encode-and-decode-base58-in-typescript-zero-dependencies-3c6k</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/opensourcecrypto/how-to-encode-and-decode-base58-in-typescript-zero-dependencies-3c6k</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Base58 is everywhere in crypto — Solana addresses, Bitcoin wallets, IPFS CIDs. Here's how to work with it in TypeScript without pulling in a dependency tree.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Why Base58?
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Base58 is like Base64 but without characters that look similar: no 0, O, I, or l. This makes it perfect for addresses and keys that humans need to read or type.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Quick Start
&lt;/h2&gt;


&lt;div class="highlight js-code-highlight"&gt;
&lt;pre class="highlight plaintext"&gt;&lt;code&gt;npm install base58-core

&lt;p&gt;import { encode, decode } from 'base58-core';&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;const encoded = encode(new Uint8Array([72, 101, 108, 108, 111]));&lt;br&gt;
console.log(encoded); // "9Ajdvzr"&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;const decoded = decode(encoded);&lt;br&gt;
console.log(decoded); // Uint8Array&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
  &lt;br&gt;
  &lt;br&gt;
  With Checksum (Base58Check)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Bitcoin and Solana addresses use Base58Check — base58 with a 4-byte SHA-256 checksum:&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;div class="highlight js-code-highlight"&gt;
&lt;pre class="highlight plaintext"&gt;&lt;code&gt;import { encodeChecked, decodeChecked } from 'base58-core';

&lt;p&gt;const address = encodeChecked(publicKeyBytes);&lt;br&gt;
const verified = decodeChecked(address);&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
  &lt;br&gt;
  &lt;br&gt;
  CLI Usage&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;div class="highlight js-code-highlight"&gt;
&lt;pre class="highlight plaintext"&gt;&lt;code&gt;npx base58-cli encode "hello"&lt;br&gt;
// 9Ajdvzr&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
  &lt;br&gt;
  &lt;br&gt;
  Why Not bs58?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;bs58 is the most popular option, but it depends on base-x. If you want something with zero dependencies, native TypeScript types, and ESM/CJS dual builds, base58-core covers the same API.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;GitHub: &lt;a href="https://github.com/opensource-crypto/base58-core" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://github.com/opensource-crypto/base58-core&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>typescript</category>
      <category>solana</category>
      <category>web3</category>
      <category>javascript</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
