<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Pavan Swamy</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Pavan Swamy (@pavan-swamy).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/pavan-swamy</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/pavan-swamy"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>LLMs Write. JEV Decides. And That Changes Everything.</title>
      <dc:creator>Pavan Swamy</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 16:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/pavan-swamy/llms-write-jev-decides-and-that-changes-everything-1oc3</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/pavan-swamy/llms-write-jev-decides-and-that-changes-everything-1oc3</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What if the future of AI isn't about generating better text, but making better decisions?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We've spent the last few years teaching AI how to write.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;code&gt;ChatGPT&lt;/code&gt; writes &lt;code&gt;emails&lt;/code&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;code&gt;Claude&lt;/code&gt; writes &lt;code&gt;code&lt;/code&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;code&gt;Gemini&lt;/code&gt; writes &lt;code&gt;summaries&lt;/code&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And they're all incredibly good at it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But after learning about &lt;strong&gt;JEV&lt;/strong&gt;, I started thinking differently.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Maybe the next big leap in AI isn't writing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Maybe it's deciding.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Example #1: Writer vs Referee
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Think of an LLM as a writer.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You ask a question and it writes an answer.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Think of JEV as a referee.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You ask a question and it makes a decision.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A &lt;code&gt;writer&lt;/code&gt; &lt;strong&gt;explains&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A &lt;code&gt;referee&lt;/code&gt; &lt;strong&gt;decides&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Both are important, but they solve different problems.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Why This Matters
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Imagine you're building a support system.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;An email arrives:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"My payment failed. Please help."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Most LLMs will generate a detailed explanation about the request.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But your application doesn't need an explanation.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It needs an action.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;JEV might simply respond:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="highlight js-code-highlight"&gt;
&lt;pre class="highlight json"&gt;&lt;code&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;{&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="w"&gt;
  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="nl"&gt;"category"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="w"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="s2"&gt;"Billing"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="w"&gt;
  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="nl"&gt;"confidence"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="w"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="mf"&gt;0.98&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="w"&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;}&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="w"&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;



&lt;p&gt;Now the ticket can be routed instantly.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No parsing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No prompt engineering.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No extra steps.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just a decision.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Example #2: Student vs Examiner
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Imagine a classroom.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LLM = Student&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;JEV = Examiner&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The &lt;strong&gt;student&lt;/strong&gt; writes an essay.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The &lt;strong&gt;examiner&lt;/strong&gt; gives a score.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One creates content.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The other makes judgments.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Most business workflows care more about the judgment than the essay.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The Real Problem With LLMs
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Don't get me wrong.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I love LLMs.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But many applications use them for tasks like:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Spam detection&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Lead scoring&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Ticket routing&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Risk assessment&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Content moderation&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;These aren't writing problems.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They're decision problems.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Using a large language model for some of these tasks can feel like hiring a novelist to answer yes-or-no questions.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It works.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But it isn't always the best tool for the job.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Example #3: AI as a Company
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Imagine AI models are employees.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;👨‍💻 &lt;code&gt;ChatGPT&lt;/code&gt; is the content writer.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;🔍 &lt;code&gt;Claude&lt;/code&gt; is the researcher.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;📋 &lt;code&gt;JEV&lt;/code&gt; is the operations manager.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The writer creates content.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The researcher gathers information.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The operations manager decides what happens next.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Every successful company needs all three.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  What I Find Most Interesting
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;JEV doesn't just make decisions.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It also tells you how confident it is.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For example:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="highlight js-code-highlight"&gt;
&lt;pre class="highlight json"&gt;&lt;code&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;{&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="w"&gt;
  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="nl"&gt;"spam"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="w"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="kc"&gt;true&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="w"&gt;
  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="nl"&gt;"confidence"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="w"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="mf"&gt;0.99&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="w"&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;}&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="w"&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;



&lt;p&gt;Now your application can do something smart:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="highlight js-code-highlight"&gt;
&lt;pre class="highlight ruby"&gt;&lt;code&gt;&lt;span class="k"&gt;if&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="n"&gt;confidence&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="o"&gt;&amp;gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="mf"&gt;0.95&lt;/span&gt;
  &lt;span class="n"&gt;auto_process&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class="k"&gt;else&lt;/span&gt;
  &lt;span class="n"&gt;send_to_human&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class="k"&gt;end&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;



&lt;p&gt;This creates a beautiful &lt;strong&gt;partnership&lt;/strong&gt; between &lt;strong&gt;AI&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;humans&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;High confidence?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Automate it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Low confidence?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ask for review.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Where JEV Could Shine
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;✅ Email classification&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;✅ Customer support routing&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;✅ Lead scoring&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;✅ Fraud detection&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;✅ Content moderation&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;✅ AI agent workflows&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;✅ Workflow automation&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Every one of these is fundamentally a decision-making problem.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The Future Might Be Both
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I don't think JEV replaces LLMs.&lt;/strong&gt; ❌&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I think they work together.&lt;/strong&gt; 🤝&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A future workflow could look like this:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="highlight js-code-highlight"&gt;
&lt;pre class="highlight plaintext"&gt;&lt;code&gt;User Request
     ↓
    JEV
(Classify Intent)
     ↓
    LLM
(Generate Response)
     ↓
Application
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;



&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The LLM writes.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;JEV decides.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Each model focuses on what it does best.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;And that's exactly what &lt;strong&gt;JEV&lt;/strong&gt; is built for.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Source&lt;/strong&gt;: &lt;a href="https://typesafe.ai/blog/introducing-system-one-models-and-jev" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;TypeSafe AI - Introducing System One Models &amp;amp; Jev&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>jev</category>
      <category>ai</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Simple Tool for Finding the Right Open-Source LLM for Your Hardware</title>
      <dc:creator>Pavan Swamy</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 11:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/pavan-swamy/a-simple-tool-for-finding-the-right-open-source-llm-for-your-hardware-39b</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/pavan-swamy/a-simple-tool-for-finding-the-right-open-source-llm-for-your-hardware-39b</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been exploring local AI models lately, and one question keeps coming up:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;"&lt;em&gt;Which model can actually run on my machine?&lt;/em&gt;"&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With so many options available, it's easy to spend time downloading a model only to find out your laptop struggles to run it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That's why I found &lt;strong&gt;LLMFit&lt;/strong&gt; interesting. It checks your system specs &lt;em&gt;(CPU, RAM, and GPU)&lt;/em&gt; and suggests LLMs that are a good fit for your hardware. The project is designed to help developers quickly find models that can run efficiently on their machines.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you're learning AI, experimenting with Ollama, or building side projects with local LLMs, it might save you some trial and error.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;👉 GitHub: &lt;a href="https://github.com/AlexsJones/llmfit" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;LLMFit&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Have you tried running LLMs locally? I'd love to hear which models work best on your setup.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>opensource</category>
      <category>llm</category>
      <category>genai</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
