<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Vlad Harbarchuk</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Vlad Harbarchuk (@pazzavlad).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/pazzavlad</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/pazzavlad"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>16 vs 13-inch MacBook Pro for Node.js Development</title>
      <dc:creator>Vlad Harbarchuk</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 15:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/pazzavlad/16-vs-13-inch-macbook-pro-for-node-js-development-hdb</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/pazzavlad/16-vs-13-inch-macbook-pro-for-node-js-development-hdb</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi everyone!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I’m using a MacBook Air (2013) with i5-4250U and want to update to some newer model. The main goal is to decrease server restart time of a big Node.js project and decrease time of TypeScript compilation. Currently it takes about 8 and 25 second respectively. As projects growing it starting really bothers me.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I’m choosing between:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.apple.com/shop/buy-mac/macbook-pro/13-inch-space-gray-2.0ghz-quad-core-processor-with-turbo-boost-up-to-3.8ghz-512gb#"&gt;13-inch 2020 with &lt;strong&gt;4-cores i5-1038NG7&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.apple.com/shop/buy-mac/macbook-pro/16-inch-space-gray-2.6ghz-6-core-processor-512gb#"&gt;16-inch 2019 with &lt;strong&gt;6 cores i7-9750H&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The question is&lt;/strong&gt;: is it worth to spend +600$ more for additional 2 cores? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://nanoreview.net/en/cpu-compare/intel-core-i7-9750h-vs-intel-core-i5-1038ng7"&gt;The benchmarks&lt;/a&gt; shows that the i7-9750H up to &lt;strong&gt;35% faster&lt;/strong&gt; in multicore benchmarks, but in single-core the 1038NG7 can be even a bit faster. Also 9750H has &lt;strong&gt;2 times bigger L3 cache&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;RAM and storage are the same, but the 13-inch model has faster memory: 3733MHz vs 2666MHz.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;80% of the time I use an external monitor, so screen size is not a dealbreaker for me. &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>discuss</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
