<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Pratap Lakshman</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Pratap Lakshman (@pvlakshm).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/pvlakshm</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/pvlakshm"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>The Agentic SDLC</title>
      <dc:creator>Pratap Lakshman</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 06:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/pvlakshm/the-agentic-sdlc-3fnn</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/pvlakshm/the-agentic-sdlc-3fnn</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Can an AI Agents Actually Follow the Software Development Lifecycle?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;AI coding agents are getting remarkably good at building applications.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Give one a prompt like:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;"Build me a web app that counts the most frequently occurring words in a piece of text."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;and you'll probably get something working.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But can an AI agent follow a software development process?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So I tried it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here is a simple word-frequency web application built using five separate stages:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Requirements → Design → Implementation → Testing → Deployment&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Instead of giving the agent one giant prompt, each stage produces an artifact that becomes the input to the next stage.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The result is a working application at the end of the entire process.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Watch the video here:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mXdO_WMC70" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mXdO_WMC70&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But the interesting part is that you can run the experiment yourself.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Everything described in the video is on this GitHub repo:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="https://github.com/postqode/postqode-community/tree/main/samples/apps/wordfreq" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://github.com/postqode/postqode-community/tree/main/samples/apps/wordfreq&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Give it a try and see what gets built.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We've spent a lot of time teaching AI to write code.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The next step is teaching AI to follow the software engineering process.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Instead of saying:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;"Build this application."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;we say:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;"Take this application through requirements, design, implementation, testing and deployment."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That's a very different way of thinking about AI-assisted software engineering.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>sdlc</category>
      <category>postqode</category>
      <category>softwareengineering</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AI in the SDLC</title>
      <dc:creator>Pratap Lakshman</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 11:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/pvlakshm/ai-in-the-sdlc-28l</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/pvlakshm/ai-in-the-sdlc-28l</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;For those experimenting with AI in the SDLC: Where do you experience the most friction today? Let me know your comments!&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>aisdlc</category>
      <category>softwareengineering</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
