<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Rabata</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Rabata (@rabata_io).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/rabata_io</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/rabata_io"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>We benchmarked 10+ S3 providers — here's what the numbers actually show</title>
      <dc:creator>Rabata</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 13:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rabata_io/we-benchmarked-10-s3-providers-heres-what-the-numbers-actually-show-3025</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rabata_io/we-benchmarked-10-s3-providers-heres-what-the-numbers-actually-show-3025</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;With so many S3-compatible providers on the market, it can be difficult to understand which one truly fits your workload.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To keep things objective, we used MinIO warp v1.0.7, a widely adopted open-source benchmarking tool. Tests included upload, download, mixed workloads, small object throughput, and large object handling. All benchmarks were run under identical conditions on a Debian 13 VM with 16 GB RAM, located in US-East-1, using 8 concurrent threads and consistent object sizes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Our methodology is fully reproducible — every parameter and setup detail is publicly available. You can find the complete benchmark methodology and replication guide with step-by-step instructions to run your own tests. All pricing information reflects rates publicly available as of October 1, 2025.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Here's the summary:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F8hkwurlaiuk0egzo6dgs.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F8hkwurlaiuk0egzo6dgs.png" alt="S3 Storage Providers&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;
Performance Comparison" width="800" height="394"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
A few things that surprised us:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Mixed operations (simultaneous reads, writes, metadata) is the most realistic measure of real-world performance — and results vary wildly&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Cloudflare R2 has zero egress fees but came in last on mixed ops (44 Mbit/s) and small objects (42 obj/s)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Hetzner's numbers look low — but that's because we tested from US-East-1 and they're EU-only, so transatlantic latency skews the results&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Backblaze B2 dominates on downloads but showed timeouts during large-object tests&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For full per-provider breakdowns and detailed analysis: &lt;a href="https://rabata.io/s3-comparison" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://rabata.io/s3-comparison&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>aws</category>
      <category>s3</category>
      <category>cloudstorage</category>
      <category>api</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
