<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Rajiv Gupta</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Rajiv Gupta (@rajiv_gupta_00c1f07d3c79b).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/rajiv_gupta_00c1f07d3c79b</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/rajiv_gupta_00c1f07d3c79b"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>RAG vs Fine-tuning: teams keep using the wrong tool</title>
      <dc:creator>Rajiv Gupta</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 15:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rajiv_gupta_00c1f07d3c79b/rag-vs-fine-tuning-teams-keep-using-the-wrong-tool-2ogn</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rajiv_gupta_00c1f07d3c79b/rag-vs-fine-tuning-teams-keep-using-the-wrong-tool-2ogn</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fxxld8mqi6gcgps9r1ut7.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fxxld8mqi6gcgps9r1ut7.png" alt="RAG vs Fine-tuning technical infographic" width="800" height="1265"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Most AI architecture debates jump too quickly to "RAG or fine-tuning?"&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That is the wrong framing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The better question is: &lt;strong&gt;what problem are you actually solving?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  My current rule of thumb
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Use &lt;strong&gt;RAG&lt;/strong&gt; when the problem is about changing facts, private knowledge, citations, and traceability.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Use &lt;strong&gt;fine-tuning&lt;/strong&gt; when the problem is about behavior, style, repeated task patterns, latency, or teaching the model how to respond.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Where teams get it wrong
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A lot of AI systems fail because teams fine-tune when they actually need retrieval, or bolt on retrieval when the real issue is task behavior.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Wrong choice usually shows up as:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;stale answers&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;hallucinated confidence&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;expensive iteration cycles&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;poor explainability&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;slow path to production&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hot take: most enterprise AI apps need RAG first, fine-tuning later.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Agree or disagree?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>architecture</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AI readiness is not just a technical checklist</title>
      <dc:creator>Rajiv Gupta</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 11:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rajiv_gupta_00c1f07d3c79b/ai-readiness-is-not-just-a-technical-checklist-3gl9</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rajiv_gupta_00c1f07d3c79b/ai-readiness-is-not-just-a-technical-checklist-3gl9</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Ffexhq88rxkonakv30nj8.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Ffexhq88rxkonakv30nj8.png" alt="AI readiness infographic for business, data, secure cloud, governance, and 45-day pilot" width="800" height="1251"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;AI readiness is not only a technical assessment. For enterprise teams, it is a decision across business outcomes, data quality, secure cloud foundations, governance, and workflow adoption.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At DigiScience Techsol, we recommend starting with the smallest safe pilot that can prove measurable business value before scaling.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Start small. Prove ROI. Scale safely.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>cloud</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RAG Is Not a Chatbot Feature. It Is Production AI Infrastructure.</title>
      <dc:creator>Rajiv Gupta</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 12:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rajiv_gupta_00c1f07d3c79b/rag-is-not-a-chatbot-feature-it-is-production-ai-infrastructure-49m8</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rajiv_gupta_00c1f07d3c79b/rag-is-not-a-chatbot-feature-it-is-production-ai-infrastructure-49m8</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fqzneswpsnef01wbzbwb6.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fqzneswpsnef01wbzbwb6.png" alt="RAG is production AI infrastructure infographic" width="800" height="800"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Most enterprise RAG failures are not model failures.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They are infrastructure failures.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The demo works because the PDF is clean, the user is friendly, the permissions are simple, and nobody is measuring drift, latency, access control, source quality, or hallucination risk.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Production RAG needs more than a vector database:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Data pipelines that know what changed&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Identity-aware retrieval&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Source quality scoring&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Prompt and response guardrails&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;GPU / inference cost controls&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Observability for retrieval, latency, grounding, and failed answers&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Human approval for high-risk actions&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The real question is not:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Which LLM should we use?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The better question is:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What infrastructure makes this AI answer trustworthy enough for business use?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Discussion question:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you were building an enterprise RAG system today, which layer would you harden first: data quality, access control, evaluation, observability, or cost governance?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Tags: Enterprise AI, RAG, LLMOps, Cloud Architecture, AI Infrastructure, MLOps, Responsible AI, Generative AI.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>cloud</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
