<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Rajvir Singh</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Rajvir Singh (@rajvirs99).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/rajvirs99</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/rajvirs99"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Why do we need Redux If we can use JavaScript LocalStorage?</title>
      <dc:creator>Rajvir Singh</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 15:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rajvirs99/why-do-we-need-redux-if-we-can-use-javascript-localstorage-508n</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rajvirs99/why-do-we-need-redux-if-we-can-use-javascript-localstorage-508n</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;As a JS Developer, Today I was learning JavaScript and found a thing called LocalStorage where we can store data in the variables just like PHP Sessions and then call it wherever we want. Then what I felt like is LocalStorage is the same as Redux. I might be missing something which can make Redux different from Js LocalStorage. So that's why a question just arose in my mind that Why do we need Redux. Can we seriously use LocalStorage instead of Redux?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
