<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: rheorix</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by rheorix (@rheorix).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/rheorix</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/rheorix"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>I built a multi-agent AI workflow with Claude Code + Java/Spring Boot (real-world experiment)</title>
      <dc:creator>rheorix</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 20:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rheorix/i-built-a-multi-agent-ai-workflow-with-claude-code-javaspring-boot-real-world-experiment-5hl6</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rheorix/i-built-a-multi-agent-ai-workflow-with-claude-code-javaspring-boot-real-world-experiment-5hl6</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been experimenting with Claude Code to go beyond “AI as a copilot” and instead simulate a small team of AI agents working on software development tasks.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The idea was simple:&lt;br&gt;
Instead of asking Claude to help with isolated snippets, I structured it into a workflow where different “agents” handle:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;code generation&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;review &amp;amp; validation&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;architecture decisions&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;cost/governance constraints&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;All orchestrated through a Java / Spring Boot backend.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What I found interesting is that the real challenge wasn’t generating code — it was coordination, governance, and control over the system behavior.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In practice, the hard problems became:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;preventing agents from diverging in logic&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;maintaining consistency across outputs&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;controlling cost and iteration loops&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;introducing human decision points at the right time&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I documented the full setup, architecture, and lessons learned here:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="https://www.rheorix.com/en/2026/05/19/how-i-built-a-team-of-ai-agents-with-claude-code/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://www.rheorix.com/en/2026/05/19/how-i-built-a-team-of-ai-agents-with-claude-code/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;→ Full code and repository on GitHub: &lt;a href="https://github.com/rheorix/agentic-company" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://github.com/rheorix/agentic-company&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Curious if anyone else is experimenting with similar multi-agent setups — especially in production or near-production environments.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What patterns are you using for orchestration and governance?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>agentskills</category>
      <category>claude</category>
      <category>java</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
