<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: AI Tech Connect</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by AI Tech Connect (@rishi_kora).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/rishi_kora</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/rishi_kora"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>AI Engineer Salary Negotiation 2026: How to Navigate the Two-Tier Pay Gap</title>
      <dc:creator>AI Tech Connect</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 11:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rishi_kora/ai-engineer-salary-negotiation-2026-how-to-navigate-the-two-tier-pay-gap-3f8</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rishi_kora/ai-engineer-salary-negotiation-2026-how-to-navigate-the-two-tier-pay-gap-3f8</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally published on &lt;a href="https://aitechconnect.in/tips/ai-engineer-salary-negotiation-two-tier-market-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;AI Tech Connect&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Two-Tier Market — Why the Same Title Pays 4× More at a Lab The AI engineering market is not one market — it is two, separated by a structural pay gap that no amount of negotiation skill will fully close if you are targeting the wrong tier. Understanding the distinction before you begin negotiating is the single most valuable reframe in this guide. Tier 1: Frontier labs. As of June 2026, this means OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepMind, and a small number of well-funded peers who are directly competing to advance the frontier of AI capability. These organisations treat engineering talent as a strategic variable in a race where a single breakthrough team can shift billions of dollars in market value. Median total compensation for software engineers at these organisations runs $600K–$795K. Senior…&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://aitechconnect.in/tips/ai-engineer-salary-negotiation-two-tier-market-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Read the full article on AI Tech Connect →&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>product</category>
      <category>career</category>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>machinelearning</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>India's AI Ecosystem Hits $2.9B: Sarvam Open-Sources Its 105B Foundational Model</title>
      <dc:creator>AI Tech Connect</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 09:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rishi_kora/indias-ai-ecosystem-hits-29b-sarvam-open-sources-its-105b-foundational-model-2d9l</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rishi_kora/indias-ai-ecosystem-hits-29b-sarvam-open-sources-its-105b-foundational-model-2d9l</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally published on &lt;a href="https://aitechconnect.in/news/sarvam-105b-open-source-india-ai-ecosystem-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;AI Tech Connect&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sarvam's open-source bet: what Sarvam-30B and Sarvam-105B actually are In February 2026, Bengaluru-based Sarvam AI released two foundational large language models under an open licence: Sarvam-30B and Sarvam-105B. These are not the speech recognition or transliteration tools Sarvam built its early reputation on. They are full-stack generative language models — trained from scratch to handle the breadth of India's official language landscape, including Hindi, Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, Bengali, Marathi, and a further 16 of the country's 22 scheduled languages. The distinction matters. Earlier open-source Indian AI releases tended to be fine-tuned adaptations of Western base models — essentially Llama or Mistral with additional multilingual data layered on top. Sarvam's 2026 release claims a…&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://aitechconnect.in/news/sarvam-105b-open-source-india-ai-ecosystem-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Read the full article on AI Tech Connect →&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>funding</category>
      <category>opensource</category>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>machinelearning</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AI Coding Stack War: Microsoft Drops Claude Code, Uber Burns Its 2026 Budget</title>
      <dc:creator>AI Tech Connect</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 07:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rishi_kora/ai-coding-stack-war-microsoft-drops-claude-code-uber-burns-its-2026-budget-4joo</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rishi_kora/ai-coding-stack-war-microsoft-drops-claude-code-uber-burns-its-2026-budget-4joo</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally published on &lt;a href="https://aitechconnect.in/news/ai-coding-stack-enterprise-2026-copilot-war" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;AI Tech Connect&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The enterprise versus developer divide The AI coding tools market is experiencing a bifurcation that no one in procurement was prepared for. On one side, enterprise IT departments want a single, auditable, cost-predictable tool that runs through existing SSO, generates compliance logs, and shows up as one line item on the software licence invoice. On the other side, developers are voting with their behaviour: they want whatever produces the best code the fastest, regardless of what the purchasing policy says. The result is a shadow-stack problem that is playing out at companies of every size. A developer's official tool might be GitHub Copilot. Their actual coding workflow involves Claude Code for multi-file reasoning, Cursor for in-editor autocomplete, and occasionally a locally running…&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://aitechconnect.in/news/ai-coding-stack-enterprise-2026-copilot-war" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Read the full article on AI Tech Connect →&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>opensource</category>
      <category>product</category>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>machinelearning</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Claude Fable 5: Anthropic's Most Powerful Public Model Is Here</title>
      <dc:creator>AI Tech Connect</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 05:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rishi_kora/claude-fable-5-anthropics-most-powerful-public-model-is-here-4amf</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rishi_kora/claude-fable-5-anthropics-most-powerful-public-model-is-here-4amf</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally published on &lt;a href="https://aitechconnect.in/news/claude-fable-5-launch-june-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;AI Tech Connect&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What Fable 5 actually is The name requires a brief explanation. Anthropic organises its models into capability families. The Mythos family is its frontier tier — the most capable models the company has trained. Until 9 June 2026, that tier was entirely gated: no public API access, research-only distribution. Fable 5 changes that. Fable 5 is the first Mythos-class model that any developer can call via the Claude API today. It is not the absolute frontier — that position belongs to Claude Mythos 5, announced simultaneously but not yet publicly available. Think of Mythos 5 as the research version and Fable 5 as the production-accessible counterpart: it shares the Mythos architectural lineage, delivers the same category of capability gains, and is the model builders will actually be able to…&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://aitechconnect.in/news/claude-fable-5-launch-june-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Read the full article on AI Tech Connect →&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>product</category>
      <category>modelrelease</category>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>machinelearning</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Orchestrating Claude Code Subagents: Multi-Agent Patterns for Production</title>
      <dc:creator>AI Tech Connect</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 15:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rishi_kora/orchestrating-claude-code-subagents-multi-agent-patterns-for-production-4ncn</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rishi_kora/orchestrating-claude-code-subagents-multi-agent-patterns-for-production-4ncn</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally published on &lt;a href="https://aitechconnect.in/tips/claude-code-subagent-multi-agent-orchestration-production-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;AI Tech Connect&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why Single-Agent Claude Code Breaks Past Three Files Claude Code is Anthropic's command-line AI agent that operates at the project level, not line by line. It reads your codebase, plans a sequence of actions, executes them with real development tools — git, package managers, test runners — evaluates the result, and adjusts. For focused tasks on a handful of files, this single-agent loop is remarkably capable. The problem emerges when the task grows. Most agents "fall apart past three files" because they are trying to hold coherent state across an ever-growing context: the original instructions, every file read, every tool result, every intermediate edit. The context window fills; earlier edits slip out of the model's effective attention; contradictions creep in. The instinct to reach for…&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://aitechconnect.in/tips/claude-code-subagent-multi-agent-orchestration-production-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Read the full article on AI Tech Connect →&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>infra</category>
      <category>aicoding</category>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>machinelearning</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Prompt Caching Deep Dive: Cut Your LLM API Bill by 90%</title>
      <dc:creator>AI Tech Connect</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 13:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rishi_kora/prompt-caching-deep-dive-cut-your-llm-api-bill-by-90-424f</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rishi_kora/prompt-caching-deep-dive-cut-your-llm-api-bill-by-90-424f</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally published on &lt;a href="https://aitechconnect.in/tips/prompt-caching-llm-api-cost-90-percent-claude-gpt-gemini-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;AI Tech Connect&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What prompt caching is and why it saves so much Every time you call an LLM API, the provider's inference servers process every token in your prompt from scratch — parsing, attending, computing. That processing is where most of the cost lives. Prompt caching lets the provider store the key-value (KV) state for a portion of your prompt so that subsequent calls with the same prefix can skip the expensive recomputation entirely. The result is dramatic. Anthropic reports up to 90% cost reduction and 85% latency reduction for long prompts when cache hits occur. Across all major providers, 2026 benchmarks show prompt caching reduces API costs by 41–80% and improves time-to-first-token (TTFT) by 13–31%. The savings are so substantial because most production LLM workloads have a large, static…&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://aitechconnect.in/tips/prompt-caching-llm-api-cost-90-percent-claude-gpt-gemini-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Read the full article on AI Tech Connect →&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>product</category>
      <category>costoptimisation</category>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>machinelearning</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Build an AI Portfolio That Gets You Hired: Five Projects Hiring Managers Actually Want to See</title>
      <dc:creator>AI Tech Connect</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 11:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rishi_kora/build-an-ai-portfolio-that-gets-you-hired-five-projects-hiring-managers-actually-want-to-see-3ih2</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rishi_kora/build-an-ai-portfolio-that-gets-you-hired-five-projects-hiring-managers-actually-want-to-see-3ih2</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally published on &lt;a href="https://aitechconnect.in/tips/ai-portfolio-projects-hired-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;AI Tech Connect&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why Hiring Managers Check GitHub Before Your CV The shift happened gradually, then all at once. By mid-2026, the proof-of-work expectation that once applied only to senior engineers has spread across every AI-adjacent role. Hiring managers at well-funded AI-native companies — and increasingly at traditional enterprises standing up AI teams — no longer treat a CV as evidence of capability. They treat it as a shortlist filter. Your GitHub, your Hugging Face spaces, your portfolio demo links: these are where capability is demonstrated. The numbers support the urgency. As of June 2026, AI Engineer is the fastest-growing job title in the United States, with job postings rising 143% year-on-year in 2025. AI postings now make up 2.5% of all US job listings — a 55% jump year-on-year. Average…&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://aitechconnect.in/tips/ai-portfolio-projects-hired-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Read the full article on AI Tech Connect →&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>opensource</category>
      <category>career</category>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>machinelearning</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Agentic Software: How AI Agents Are Restructuring the Software Paradigm</title>
      <dc:creator>AI Tech Connect</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 09:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rishi_kora/agentic-software-how-ai-agents-are-restructuring-the-software-paradigm-j2g</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rishi_kora/agentic-software-how-ai-agents-are-restructuring-the-software-paradigm-j2g</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally published on &lt;a href="https://aitechconnect.in/news/agentic-software-paradigm-ai-agents-restructuring-software-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;AI Tech Connect&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The paper that formalises what builders already knew For the past 18 months, teams shipping with AI coding agents have been running ahead of the academic literature. They knew that something structural had changed — that agents were no longer assistants completing a single prompt but orchestrators driving entire development cycles. The vocabulary to describe the shift, however, was inconsistent and often borrowed awkwardly from classical software engineering. A paper published on arXiv in June 2026 — "Agentic Software: How AI Agents Are Restructuring the Software Paradigm" — gives the shift a formal name and a rigorous framework. The core argument is direct: AI agents are now the primary orchestrators in agentic software systems. They are not tools invoked by deterministic code. They are…&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://aitechconnect.in/news/agentic-software-paradigm-ai-agents-restructuring-software-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Read the full article on AI Tech Connect →&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>product</category>
      <category>research</category>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>machinelearning</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AI Takes 57% of All Startup Capital in Q1 2026: What Funded Teams Are Building</title>
      <dc:creator>AI Tech Connect</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 07:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rishi_kora/ai-takes-57-of-all-startup-capital-in-q1-2026-what-funded-teams-are-building-2gb3</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rishi_kora/ai-takes-57-of-all-startup-capital-in-q1-2026-what-funded-teams-are-building-2gb3</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally published on &lt;a href="https://aitechconnect.in/news/ai-57-percent-startup-capital-q1-2026-funded-teams" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;AI Tech Connect&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The headline number and why it matters In Q1 2026, AI companies captured 57% of all global startup capital. That is not a rounding error or a statistical artefact — it is a structural reorientation of where institutional capital believes the next decade of value will be created. For context, AI's share of VC was in the low teens just three years ago. Four rounds alone drove a disproportionate share of that figure. OpenAI closed a $122 billion round — the largest in the history of private markets. Anthropic followed with $30 billion. Elon Musk's xAI raised $20 billion, and Waymo secured $16 billion. Those four rounds combined total $188 billion — a sum that, on its own, dwarfs the entire venture capital output of most previous quarters. Nothing in the history of venture capital looks quite…&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://aitechconnect.in/news/ai-57-percent-startup-capital-q1-2026-funded-teams" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Read the full article on AI Tech Connect →&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>infra</category>
      <category>funding</category>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>machinelearning</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GitHub Copilot AI Credits Billing Switch: June 2026 Guide</title>
      <dc:creator>AI Tech Connect</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 05:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rishi_kora/github-copilot-ai-credits-billing-switch-june-2026-guide-507e</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rishi_kora/github-copilot-ai-credits-billing-switch-june-2026-guide-507e</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally published on &lt;a href="https://aitechconnect.in/news/github-copilot-ai-credits-usage-billing-shock-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;AI Tech Connect&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What actually changed on 1 June 2026 GitHub Copilot's billing model shifted from a flat monthly fee to a token-based system called AI Credits. Per GitHub's billing announcement, one AI Credit equals $0.01, and usage is charged across input tokens, output tokens, and cached tokens. Premium models — the newer, more capable options available through Copilot — consume more credits per token than standard models. The change did not affect everything equally. Code completions and Next Edit Suggestions remain unlimited and are not billed in AI Credits. The usage-based charges apply to everything else: chat, agent mode, pull request reviews, and other AI-powered features that sit beyond basic autocomplete. Each plan now bundles a monthly credit allowance alongside the subscription fee: Plan…&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://aitechconnect.in/news/github-copilot-ai-credits-usage-billing-shock-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Read the full article on AI Tech Connect →&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>infra</category>
      <category>product</category>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>machinelearning</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Freelance AI Engineer Rates in 2026: How to Command £240/hr</title>
      <dc:creator>AI Tech Connect</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 15:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rishi_kora/freelance-ai-engineer-rates-in-2026-how-to-command-ps240hr-4c1o</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rishi_kora/freelance-ai-engineer-rates-in-2026-how-to-command-ps240hr-4c1o</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally published on &lt;a href="https://aitechconnect.in/tips/freelance-ai-engineer-rates-positioning-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;AI Tech Connect&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Rate tiers by specialty in 2026 (UK + India): generalist ML/AI engineers earn £60–£120/hr (UK) or ₹2,000–₹8,000/hr (India domestic); RAG and agent specialists earn £120–£240/hr (UK) or ₹5,000–₹25,000/hr on international contracts. Niche AI engineers earn 2–4 times the generalist rate because specialist knowledge — production RAG at scale, LLM fine-tuning for regulated domains, agent pipelines with reliable tool use — is genuinely hard to acquire quickly and even harder for clients to audit. Value-based pricing is becoming common for product-level AI contracts, with 10–40% of measurable outcomes replacing the day-rate model — but only when you have a track record and the client can measure results. What clients are actually buying when they hire an AI freelancer is not code — it is…&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://aitechconnect.in/tips/freelance-ai-engineer-rates-positioning-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Read the full article on AI Tech Connect →&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>research</category>
      <category>career</category>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>machinelearning</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RAG Chunking Strategies: Fixed, Semantic, and Hierarchical</title>
      <dc:creator>AI Tech Connect</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 13:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rishi_kora/rag-chunking-strategies-fixed-semantic-and-hierarchical-3k05</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rishi_kora/rag-chunking-strategies-fixed-semantic-and-hierarchical-3k05</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally published on &lt;a href="https://aitechconnect.in/tips/rag-chunking-embedding-strategies-production-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;AI Tech Connect&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What chunking strategy you use is the single highest-leverage decision in RAG retrieval quality — it sets the ceiling on everything downstream. Three production strategies compared with benchmark data: fixed chunking (the reliable baseline), semantic chunking (best for narrative text), and hierarchical chunking (three to five times F1 improvement on structured documents). The "measure before you switch" rule: always run your golden eval set against each chunking strategy before deploying a change to production. Why chunking is the highest-leverage RAG decision Most RAG failures happen at retrieval, not at generation. The language model at the end of the pipeline can only reason from what retrieval hands it — if the right passage never reaches the context window, no amount of prompting,…&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://aitechconnect.in/tips/rag-chunking-embedding-strategies-production-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Read the full article on AI Tech Connect →&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>opensource</category>
      <category>agentsrag</category>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>machinelearning</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
