<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Robert</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Robert (@robswierk).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/robswierk</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/robswierk"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Top 5 MCP Servers Worth Setting Up If You Work Solo</title>
      <dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 10:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/robswierk/top-5-mcp-servers-worth-setting-up-if-you-work-solo-ch</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/robswierk/top-5-mcp-servers-worth-setting-up-if-you-work-solo-ch</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  MCP servers are leverage, not toys
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The first thing to internalise about Model Context Protocol: every server you wire up adds tool-use tokens to every Claude request, whether you use the tool or not. The browser-automation MCP server alone often adds 4-6K tokens of tool descriptions to your context. Wire up six servers and you've spent your premium context on advertising tools that won't fire in this conversation.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That's why "more MCP servers" isn't the right question. The right question is: &lt;em&gt;which workflows do I want Claude to handle without copy-pasting?&lt;/em&gt; Then pick the smallest MCP that answers each one.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;/ #1 FILESYSTEM&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The one nobody talks about because it's boring
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The official filesystem MCP server lets Claude read, write, and search files in a scoped directory. It sounds underwhelming. It is the highest-ROI MCP server for a solo dev, by far.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why: most of your context loss with Claude isn't intellectual, it's logistical. You spend tokens copy-pasting file contents, asking Claude to remember layouts, re-explaining what's in the repo. With filesystem MCP, Claude can read the file once instead of you describing it twenty times.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Setup is one block in your &lt;code&gt;mcp.json&lt;/code&gt;. Lock it down to one or two project directories, don't let it browse $HOME.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;/ #2 GIT&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Diff, log, blame, for free
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The git MCP server gives Claude &lt;code&gt;git diff&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;git log&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;git blame&lt;/code&gt;, and a few related read-only operations. Set it up once and Claude can answer "when did this function change last?" without you copy-pasting log output.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Pair it with filesystem MCP and you've got 80% of what code review tools sell as a product, running in your terminal for zero ongoing cost.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;/ #3 OBSIDIAN&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  If you take notes outside code, this changes the game
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Obsidian Local REST API plugin + a thin MCP wrapper lets Claude read and write Obsidian notes directly. We use this every day on NeuraGrowth: project memory, daily logs, brainstorming docs, feedback memos all live in Obsidian and Claude reads/writes them in-conversation.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The win isn't the writing, it's the reading. When a session compacts and you need Claude to recall what you decided two weeks ago, having that decision in a markdown file that Claude can pull up is the difference between continuity and re-litigating every choice.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;/ #4 BROWSER AUTOMATION&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  For when you need eyes on the live site
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Playwright or Puppeteer MCP servers let Claude open a browser, navigate, take screenshots, fill forms. Heavy on tokens, install it last, not first.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Where it earns its weight: UI regression checks on local dev servers, scraping data from sites without APIs, sanity-checking that a fix actually fixed the rendered page. Don't enable it globally; turn it on per-task when you have a browser-shaped job.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;/ #5 POSTGRES&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Read-only query access to your DB
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Postgres MCP server (or similar for MySQL / SQLite) lets Claude run SELECT queries against a connected database. Configure it READ-ONLY, that's the only safe mode for daily use.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The use case: "how many users signed up in the last 30 days?" stops being a five-minute task. Claude writes the query, runs it, returns the number. Same for ad-hoc data debugging during a bug investigation. Don't grant write access from Claude unless you have very specific reasons and a backup strategy.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Three classes of MCP server I uninstalled
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;"All-in-one AI agent" servers.&lt;/strong&gt; These bundle filesystem, git, browser, search, code-exec into one big MCP. Token cost explodes, scope creep makes them fragile, and the abstractions hide what's actually happening.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;SaaS MCP wrappers for tools you don't use.&lt;/strong&gt; Notion, Linear, Jira, Slack, each has an MCP server. If you don't use the tool, the tool descriptions still eat context. Only install what you actually touch weekly.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Anything that re-implements Claude's own search.&lt;/strong&gt; Vector search MCPs, semantic-search-over-codebase MCPs, Claude's built-in grep/glob is plenty for repos under ~100K LOC. Skip the index-builder layer until you genuinely need it.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  If you have one hour
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Install in this order, test each, then move on:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Filesystem&lt;/strong&gt;, scoped to your active repo. 10 minutes.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Git&lt;/strong&gt;, same repo. 10 minutes.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Obsidian&lt;/strong&gt; (if you note in Obsidian), 15 minutes including the REST API plugin setup.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Postgres&lt;/strong&gt;, only if you have a production DB. 15 minutes for read-only config.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Browser automation&lt;/strong&gt;, install last and toggle per-session. 20 minutes.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Don't try to set up all five in one session. Each is a small commitment of muscle memory; cramming them in one Saturday leads to forgetting how to invoke half of them by Tuesday.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Less is more, until it isn't
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The temptation with MCP is the same as the temptation with VS Code extensions: install everything that looks shiny, accumulate cruft, never use 80% of it. Resist. Two well-configured servers beat ten lazily configured ones every single time. When you genuinely hit the limit of what your current setup can do, add the next one deliberately.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Originally published at &lt;a href="https://neuragrowth.co/blog/mcp-servers-solo-devs/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;neuragrowth.co&lt;/a&gt;. I run a one-person digital-products studio and write up what breaks in production.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>automation</category>
      <category>llm</category>
      <category>mcp</category>
      <category>productivity</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
