<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: rohan34-lab</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by rohan34-lab (@rohan34lab).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/rohan34lab</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/rohan34lab"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>I built a tool that turns any GitHub repo into its visual story</title>
      <dc:creator>rohan34-lab</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 16:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rohan34lab/i-built-a-tool-that-turns-any-github-repo-into-its-visual-story-ppc</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rohan34lab/i-built-a-tool-that-turns-any-github-repo-into-its-visual-story-ppc</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I've been staring at GitHub commit logs for a while now, and they've always felt like reading a book with no chapters — just an endless wall of fix: typo, refactor: auth, and update deps.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Every project has a real story. The frantic MVP sprint. The period where everything broke. The moment the community showed up. But the commit log doesn't tell it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So I built CodeTimeline.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What it does&lt;br&gt;
Paste any public GitHub URL → get a scrollable, animated visual timeline of the repo's entire history.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It pulls commit data, contributor joins, language composition changes, and PR activity from the GitHub API — then feeds the key milestones to an LLM to name "chapters" in the project's life. Things like "The Foundation", "Community Inflection", "The Great Refactor".&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Each chapter shows:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Contributor avatars appearing as new people joined&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Language donut chart morphing as the codebase evolved&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Commit frequency sparkline across the repo's lifetime&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Key stats — age, total commits, contributors, top languages&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Every timeline page also generates a shareable OG image card, so when you paste the link on X or LinkedIn it renders something actually worth clicking.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Try it&lt;br&gt;
 codetimeline.vercel.app&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Some timelines worth generating:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;facebook/react — the chapter where it became a community project is wild&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;expressjs/express — one of the cleanest "peak and plateau" stories&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;vercel/next.js — growth is almost vertical after 2020&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The tech&lt;br&gt;
Layer   Tech&lt;br&gt;
Framework   Next.js 15 (App Router)&lt;br&gt;
Animations  GSAP + ScrollTrigger&lt;br&gt;
Charts  D3.js&lt;br&gt;
AI  NVIDIA NIM (Llama 3.1 70B)&lt;br&gt;
Data    GitHub REST API&lt;br&gt;
OG images   next/og (Satori)&lt;br&gt;
Deploy  Vercel&lt;br&gt;
The hardest part wasn't the data fetching — it was making the AI chapter names feel like a human actually read the commits, not just grouped them by date. I ended up feeding it commit message clusters with contributor context, and the results got a lot more interesting.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It's open source&lt;br&gt;
GitHub: github.com/Rohan5commit/codetimeline&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you maintain an OSS project, I'd genuinely love to know what your timeline looks like — drop the link in the comments.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A few things I'm still working on:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Support for private repos (OAuth flow)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Better handling of monorepos with multiple active workstreams&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A "compare two repos" mode&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Feedback welcome — especially on the AI chapter naming. That's the part I'm least confident about and most open to improving.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>opensource</category>
      <category>showdev</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
