<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Rohit Raj</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Rohit Raj (@rohit_raj_8c7902b7d37cf21).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/rohit_raj_8c7902b7d37cf21</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/rohit_raj_8c7902b7d37cf21"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Kimi K2.7-Code vs Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5: Is the 1T Open Coding Model Worth It? (2026)</title>
      <dc:creator>Rohit Raj</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 08:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rohit_raj_8c7902b7d37cf21/kimi-k27-code-vs-claude-opus-48-and-gpt-55-is-the-1t-open-coding-model-worth-it-2026-3ejn</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rohit_raj_8c7902b7d37cf21/kimi-k27-code-vs-claude-opus-48-and-gpt-55-is-the-1t-open-coding-model-worth-it-2026-3ejn</guid>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Originally published on &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes/kimi-k2-7-code-vs-claude-opus-gpt-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;rohitraj.tech&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Moonshot AI dropped Kimi K2.7-Code on June 12, 2026 — a 1T-parameter open-weight coding model that costs $0.95/$4.00 per million tokens, roughly 5-7x cheaper than Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5. Here is the developer read: the real benchmark numbers (and why they are all first-party), a verified cost-per-task comparison the hype guides skip, how to run it via API or locally, and when you should still reach for Claude or GPT.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read the full version with code samples, diagrams, and architecture details:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes/kimi-k2-7-code-vs-claude-opus-gpt-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Kimi K2.7-Code vs Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5: Is the 1T Open Coding Model Worth It? (2026)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;More engineering notes: &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;rohitraj.tech/en/notes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>kimi</category>
      <category>k27</category>
      <category>code</category>
      <category>claude</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AI Agent Payments in 2026: x402 vs AP2 — How to Let Your Agent Actually Pay</title>
      <dc:creator>Rohit Raj</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 06:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rohit_raj_8c7902b7d37cf21/ai-agent-payments-in-2026-x402-vs-ap2-how-to-let-your-agent-actually-pay-4ee9</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rohit_raj_8c7902b7d37cf21/ai-agent-payments-in-2026-x402-vs-ap2-how-to-let-your-agent-actually-pay-4ee9</guid>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Originally published on &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes/ai-agent-payments-x402-vs-ap2-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;rohitraj.tech&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;x402 crossed 161M cumulative payments and got picked up by AWS Bedrock AgentCore in May 2026, while Google’s AP2 defines the trust layer above it. Here is the developer read: how x402 and AP2 actually work, working code to monetize an MCP server or API per request, the per-request settlement trap, and when to skip crypto rails entirely.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read the full version with code samples, diagrams, and architecture details:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes/ai-agent-payments-x402-vs-ap2-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;AI Agent Payments in 2026: x402 vs AP2 — How to Let Your Agent Actually Pay&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;More engineering notes: &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;rohitraj.tech/en/notes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>agents</category>
      <category>payments</category>
      <category>x402</category>
      <category>ap2</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OpenCode vs Claude Code vs Cursor: The Best AI Coding Agent in 2026?</title>
      <dc:creator>Rohit Raj</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 05:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rohit_raj_8c7902b7d37cf21/opencode-vs-claude-code-vs-cursor-the-best-ai-coding-agent-in-2026-580n</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rohit_raj_8c7902b7d37cf21/opencode-vs-claude-code-vs-cursor-the-best-ai-coding-agent-in-2026-580n</guid>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Originally published on &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes/opencode-vs-claude-code-cursor-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;rohitraj.tech&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;OpenCode just became the most-starred AI coding agent on GitHub — 172,198 stars under MIT, with v1.17.4 shipping June 12, 2026. Here is the developer read: how the free, model-agnostic OpenCode compares to Claude Code and Cursor, the Terminal-Bench numbers, the BYOK cost math, and when each one is the right call.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read the full version with code samples, diagrams, and architecture details:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes/opencode-vs-claude-code-cursor-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;OpenCode vs Claude Code vs Cursor: The Best AI Coding Agent in 2026?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;More engineering notes: &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;rohitraj.tech/en/notes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>opencode</category>
      <category>claude</category>
      <category>code</category>
      <category>coding</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to Run DiffusionGemma Locally: A vLLM Serving Guide for RTX 5090 and H100 (2026)</title>
      <dc:creator>Rohit Raj</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 17:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rohit_raj_8c7902b7d37cf21/how-to-run-diffusiongemma-locally-a-vllm-serving-guide-for-rtx-5090-and-h100-2026-p1e</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rohit_raj_8c7902b7d37cf21/how-to-run-diffusiongemma-locally-a-vllm-serving-guide-for-rtx-5090-and-h100-2026-p1e</guid>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Originally published on &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes/run-diffusiongemma-locally-vllm-rtx5090-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;rohitraj.tech&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A build-focused guide to self-hosting Google\'s DiffusionGemma: the exact vLLM serve command, what each diffusion flag does, how to call it like an OpenAI endpoint, and how to tune the speed-vs-quality trade-off on an RTX 5090 or H100.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read the full version with code samples, diagrams, and architecture details:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes/run-diffusiongemma-locally-vllm-rtx5090-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;How to Run DiffusionGemma Locally: A vLLM Serving Guide for RTX 5090 and H100 (2026)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;More engineering notes: &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;rohitraj.tech/en/notes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>run</category>
      <category>diffusiongemma</category>
      <category>locally</category>
      <category>vllm</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DiffusionGemma: Text Diffusion LLMs Explained, and When to Actually Use One (2026)</title>
      <dc:creator>Rohit Raj</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 03:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rohit_raj_8c7902b7d37cf21/diffusiongemma-text-diffusion-llms-explained-and-when-to-actually-use-one-2026-1l68</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rohit_raj_8c7902b7d37cf21/diffusiongemma-text-diffusion-llms-explained-and-when-to-actually-use-one-2026-1l68</guid>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Originally published on &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes/diffusiongemma-text-diffusion-llm-guide-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;rohitraj.tech&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Google open-sourced DiffusionGemma on June 10, 2026 — a 26B MoE that writes a 256-token block in parallel instead of one token at a time, hitting 700+ tokens/sec on an RTX 5090 and up to 4x faster than Gemma 4. The catch: quality sits below standard Gemma 4. Here is the developer read — how text diffusion works, how to run it locally, the speed-vs-quality decision, and when to skip it.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read the full version with code samples, diagrams, and architecture details:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes/diffusiongemma-text-diffusion-llm-guide-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;DiffusionGemma: Text Diffusion LLMs Explained, and When to Actually Use One (2026)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;More engineering notes: &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;rohitraj.tech/en/notes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>diffusiongemma</category>
      <category>gemma</category>
      <category>text</category>
      <category>diffusion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Claude Fable 5: Pricing, the API, and When to Use It vs Opus 4.8 (2026)</title>
      <dc:creator>Rohit Raj</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 04:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rohit_raj_8c7902b7d37cf21/claude-fable-5-pricing-the-api-and-when-to-use-it-vs-opus-48-2026-o84</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rohit_raj_8c7902b7d37cf21/claude-fable-5-pricing-the-api-and-when-to-use-it-vs-opus-48-2026-o84</guid>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Originally published on &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes/claude-fable-5-developer-guide-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;rohitraj.tech&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anthropic shipped Claude Fable 5 on June 9, 2026 — a Mythos-class model at $10/$50 per million tokens, double the Opus 4.8 rate. Here is the developer read: the claude-fable-5 API, the Opus-4.8 safeguard fallback you must design around, the new 30-day retention rule, Fable vs Mythos, and when to wait.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read the full version with code samples, diagrams, and architecture details:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes/claude-fable-5-developer-guide-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Claude Fable 5: Pricing, the API, and When to Use It vs Opus 4.8 (2026)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;More engineering notes: &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;rohitraj.tech/en/notes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>claude</category>
      <category>fable</category>
      <category>pricing</category>
      <category>opus</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This Week in AI Dev: Codex Builds Apps, the Open-Weight Frontier Explodes, and Anthropic Meters the Agent SDK (Week 24 of 2026)</title>
      <dc:creator>Rohit Raj</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 03:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rohit_raj_8c7902b7d37cf21/this-week-in-ai-dev-codex-builds-apps-the-open-weight-frontier-explodes-and-anthropic-meters-the-18h2</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rohit_raj_8c7902b7d37cf21/this-week-in-ai-dev-codex-builds-apps-the-open-weight-frontier-explodes-and-anthropic-meters-the-18h2</guid>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Originally published on &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes/ai-dev-week-2026-24" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;rohitraj.tech&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Week 24 of 2026 in AI dev tools: OpenAI's Codex graduates from coding agent to app builder with Sites and role plugins, three open-weight models drop in 72 hours (MiniMax M3, Gemma 4 12B, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra), Anthropic moves the Agent SDK to metered billing on June 15, Microsoft Build hardens agent security, and the Gemini CLI consumer sunset hits June 18.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read the full version with code samples, diagrams, and architecture details:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes/ai-dev-week-2026-24" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;This Week in AI Dev: Codex Builds Apps, the Open-Weight Frontier Explodes, and Anthropic Meters the Agent SDK (Week 24 of 2026)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;More engineering notes: &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;rohitraj.tech/en/notes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>dev</category>
      <category>tools</category>
      <category>week</category>
      <category>openai</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Is Harness Engineering? OpenAI’s Agent-First Codex Playbook (2026)</title>
      <dc:creator>Rohit Raj</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 04:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rohit_raj_8c7902b7d37cf21/what-is-harness-engineering-openais-agent-first-codex-playbook-2026-43kk</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rohit_raj_8c7902b7d37cf21/what-is-harness-engineering-openais-agent-first-codex-playbook-2026-43kk</guid>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Originally published on &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes/what-is-harness-engineering-codex-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;rohitraj.tech&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Harness engineering is the discipline of building the scaffolding — docs, golden rules, custom linters, and agent-to-agent review loops — that lets AI coding agents ship reliable software at scale. OpenAI coined the term after building a ~1M-line beta product in 5 months with zero hand-written code using Codex. Here is what a harness actually contains, the architecture that makes it work, when it pays off, when to skip it, and how I run a smaller version of it today.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read the full version with code samples, diagrams, and architecture details:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes/what-is-harness-engineering-codex-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;What Is Harness Engineering? OpenAI’s Agent-First Codex Playbook (2026)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;More engineering notes: &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;rohitraj.tech/en/notes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>harness</category>
      <category>engineering</category>
      <category>codex</category>
      <category>agents</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NVIDIA RTX Spark + Windows: What Microsoft’s Local-AI Superchip Means for Developers (2026)</title>
      <dc:creator>Rohit Raj</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 07:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rohit_raj_8c7902b7d37cf21/nvidia-rtx-spark-windows-what-microsofts-local-ai-superchip-means-for-developers-2026-4ne5</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rohit_raj_8c7902b7d37cf21/nvidia-rtx-spark-windows-what-microsofts-local-ai-superchip-means-for-developers-2026-4ne5</guid>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Originally published on &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes/nvidia-rtx-spark-windows-ai-agents-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;rohitraj.tech&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;NVIDIA and Microsoft unveiled the RTX Spark superchip at Computex 2026 — a 20-core Grace Arm CPU plus a 6,144-core Blackwell RTX GPU and up to 128GB unified memory that runs 120B-parameter LLMs locally with up to 1M tokens of context. Here is the developer-only read: the confirmed specs, RTX Spark vs DGX Spark, how it ties into Satya Nadella’s agentic-AI push at Build 2026, what you can actually build on it this fall, and when to wait.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read the full version with code samples, diagrams, and architecture details:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes/nvidia-rtx-spark-windows-ai-agents-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;NVIDIA RTX Spark + Windows: What Microsoft’s Local-AI Superchip Means for Developers (2026)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;More engineering notes: &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;rohitraj.tech/en/notes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>nvidia</category>
      <category>rtx</category>
      <category>spark</category>
      <category>developers</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Open Notebook vs Khoj vs SurfSense: Best Self-Hosted NotebookLM Alternative (2026)</title>
      <dc:creator>Rohit Raj</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 03:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rohit_raj_8c7902b7d37cf21/open-notebook-vs-khoj-vs-surfsense-best-self-hosted-notebooklm-alternative-2026-3g57</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rohit_raj_8c7902b7d37cf21/open-notebook-vs-khoj-vs-surfsense-best-self-hosted-notebooklm-alternative-2026-3g57</guid>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Originally published on &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes/open-notebook-vs-khoj-vs-surfsense-notebooklm-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;rohitraj.tech&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Open Notebook just hit #1 on GitHub Trending — but is it the best self-hosted NotebookLM alternative? Here's how Open Notebook (MIT), Khoj (AGPL-3.0), and SurfSense (Apache-2.0) actually compare on Docker setup, RAG architecture, integrations, and the open-source license trap that can bite a commercial build.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read the full version with code samples, diagrams, and architecture details:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes/open-notebook-vs-khoj-vs-surfsense-notebooklm-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Open Notebook vs Khoj vs SurfSense: Best Self-Hosted NotebookLM Alternative (2026)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;More engineering notes: &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;rohitraj.tech/en/notes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>open</category>
      <category>source</category>
      <category>notebooklm</category>
      <category>alternative</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AI Agent Memory in 2026: Mem0 vs Zep vs Letta vs MemPalace (Open-Source, Benchmarked)</title>
      <dc:creator>Rohit Raj</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 15:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rohit_raj_8c7902b7d37cf21/ai-agent-memory-in-2026-mem0-vs-zep-vs-letta-vs-mempalace-open-source-benchmarked-4jpl</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rohit_raj_8c7902b7d37cf21/ai-agent-memory-in-2026-mem0-vs-zep-vs-letta-vs-mempalace-open-source-benchmarked-4jpl</guid>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Originally published on &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes/open-source-ai-agent-memory-mem0-vs-zep-letta-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;rohitraj.tech&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Agent memory — not the model — is the 2026 bottleneck. MemPalace just hit 54.1k GitHub stars and shipped v3.4.0 with a 96.6% LongMemEval score and zero API calls. Here's how the four open-source AI agent memory layers (Mem0, Zep, Letta, MemPalace) actually compare on architecture, real benchmarks, and honest licensing — plus a code snippet to add memory in minutes and how I'd wire it into a production agent.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read the full version with code samples, diagrams, and architecture details:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes/open-source-ai-agent-memory-mem0-vs-zep-letta-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;AI Agent Memory in 2026: Mem0 vs Zep vs Letta vs MemPalace (Open-Source, Benchmarked)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;More engineering notes: &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;rohitraj.tech/en/notes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>open</category>
      <category>source</category>
      <category>agents</category>
      <category>memory</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Claude AI Vulnerability Scanner: Anthropic's Open-Source Code-Security Harness (2026)</title>
      <dc:creator>Rohit Raj</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 05:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rohit_raj_8c7902b7d37cf21/claude-ai-vulnerability-scanner-anthropics-open-source-code-security-harness-2026-fcp</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rohit_raj_8c7902b7d37cf21/claude-ai-vulnerability-scanner-anthropics-open-source-code-security-harness-2026-fcp</guid>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Originally published on &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes/claude-ai-vulnerability-scanner-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;rohitraj.tech&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anthropic open-sourced defending-code-reference-harness — a Claude-powered pipeline that finds and patches security bugs in your code — and it hit the GitHub Trending front page this week. Here's what actually shipped, how to run /vuln-scan on your own repo, how it compares to the claude-code-security-review Action, managed Claude Security, and Snyk/Semgrep/CodeQL, where it quietly breaks, and how I'd wire it into a production CI without burning your token budget.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read the full version with code samples, diagrams, and architecture details:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes/claude-ai-vulnerability-scanner-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Claude AI Vulnerability Scanner: Anthropic's Open-Source Code-Security Harness (2026)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;More engineering notes: &lt;a href="https://rohitraj.tech/en/notes" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;rohitraj.tech/en/notes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>claude</category>
      <category>vulnerability</category>
      <category>scanner</category>
      <category>code</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
