<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Rotem Kasahun</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Rotem Kasahun (@rotem_kasahun_5a237e05853).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/rotem_kasahun_5a237e05853</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/rotem_kasahun_5a237e05853"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>AI Coding Agents Forget Your Fixes. Make the Repository Remember.</title>
      <dc:creator>Rotem Kasahun</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 15:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/rotem_kasahun_5a237e05853/ai-coding-agents-forget-your-fixes-make-the-repository-remember-2mjd</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/rotem_kasahun_5a237e05853/ai-coding-agents-forget-your-fixes-make-the-repository-remember-2mjd</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;AI coding agents can fix a bug in one session and reintroduce it in the next. The missing ingredient is not another clever prompt: it is a small, repository-native handoff.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The loop
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Keep four things in the project:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Context: what the project is, where the relevant code lives, and which constraints matter.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Memory: decisions, history, and unresolved work in Markdown.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Verification: the checks that actually ran, plus what remains unknown.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Handoff: a short receipt for the next session.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A useful handoff answers:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;What changed?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Why was it changed?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;What evidence passed?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;What is still unverified?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Example:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="highlight js-code-highlight"&gt;
&lt;pre class="highlight plaintext"&gt;&lt;code&gt;# Handoff: stale checkout regression

## Changed
- Rejected an empty API response instead of treating it as success.
- Added a regression test for the empty response.

## Verified
- Unit tests: 14 passed
- Browser/manual flow: not run

## Still unknown
- Whether production returns the same shape under rate limiting.
- Whether an older client depends on the fallback.
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That last section matters. Tests can pass while the real browser flow, deployment, permissions, or external service remains unverified. Recording that boundary stops the next agent from overstating confidence.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  A practical QA contract
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Put a short checklist close to the code:&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;div class="highlight js-code-highlight"&gt;
&lt;pre class="highlight plaintext"&gt;&lt;code&gt;## Before calling a bug fix done

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;[ ] Reproduce the original failure or explain why it is unavailable.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;[ ] Add or update a regression test.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;[ ] Run the narrow test and relevant broader checks.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;[ ] Inspect the changed diff.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;[ ] Record automated and browser/manual coverage separately.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;[ ] Record blockers and unknowns explicitly.
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;


Keep decisions append-only
&lt;/h2&gt;


&lt;p&gt;When a choice changes, record the new decision and what it supersedes. Do not silently rewrite history. Future sessions can then answer why a behavior exists without reconstructing an old chat.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I published a free ProjectOS starter with repository-native rules, memory, QA, visual QA, code review, and handoff structure: &lt;a href="https://rotem-e.com/knowledge-base/make-your-ai-remember-and-improve-its-results?utm_source=devto&amp;amp;utm_medium=article&amp;amp;utm_campaign=pmqa_distribution_20261011" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://rotem-e.com/knowledge-base/make-your-ai-remember-and-improve-its-results?utm_source=devto&amp;amp;utm_medium=article&amp;amp;utm_campaign=pmqa_distribution_20261011&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you want the packaged version, Project Memory + QA Lite is available here: &lt;a href="https://rotemka.gumroad.com/l/project-memory-qa-lite?utm_source=devto&amp;amp;utm_medium=article&amp;amp;utm_campaign=pmqa_distribution_20261011" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://rotemka.gumroad.com/l/project-memory-qa-lite?utm_source=devto&amp;amp;utm_medium=article&amp;amp;utm_campaign=pmqa_distribution_20261011&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Disclosure: I created the free starter and also work on the paid Project Memory + QA Lite product. The free starter is enough to try the method; the paid product is a separate packaged option.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The goal is not to make an agent remember every conversation. It is to make the project carry the decisions and evidence the next session actually needs.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What do you record today when a bug fix must survive a handoff?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>testing</category>
      <category>agents</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
