<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Shaiful Islam</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Shaiful Islam (@saifcse).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/saifcse</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/saifcse"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>[CDC] Maxwell vs Debezium</title>
      <dc:creator>Shaiful Islam</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2026 16:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/saifcse/cdc-maxwell-vs-debezium-1lh0</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/saifcse/cdc-maxwell-vs-debezium-1lh0</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fh33ta5dgtegi0a5ngs65.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fh33ta5dgtegi0a5ngs65.png" alt=" " width="800" height="436"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h1&gt;
  
  
  CDC
&lt;/h1&gt;

&lt;p&gt;CDC stands for 'Change Data Capture', in a short sentence, it captures data changes mostly from DB.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Maxwell and Debezium are two most known tools used for CDC, while Maxwell is light-weight daemon specialized for MySQL only where Debezium is a big giant supporting many DBs focusing on distributed systems.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Maxwell:
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Simple, low-setup tool. Standalone daemon.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;JSON format output, easy and common way to integrate with others.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;MySQL only, limited schema features.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Debezium:
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Good for complex architectures requiring high reliability.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Supports multiple DBs, robust, large community, schema-aware.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Architecture: Distributed (Kafka Connect). &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;h1&gt;
  
  
  Key differences:
&lt;/h1&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Supported Databases: Debezium supports PostgreSQL, MongoDB, SQL Server, and MySQL, whereas Maxwell is strictly for MySQL.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Architecture: Debezium is built for distributed, fault-tolerant environments. Maxwell is a simpler, single-process tool.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Data Format: Debezium provides richer schema information, while Maxwell produces simpler, flatter JSON messages.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Offset Management: Debezium uses Kafka Connect's internal offsets, whereas Maxwell manages its own within a specific database table.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;h1&gt;
  
  
  Which one to pick?
&lt;/h1&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If we need a quick, simple way to get MySQL data into a stream without managing a complex infrastructure, Maxwell is the better choice. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If we are building a long-term, cross-database data platform and already use Kafka, Debezium is the standard. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;h1&gt;
  
  
  Use-case tips:
&lt;/h1&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Maxwell:
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Separate schema storage: in high-traffic env, avoid running maxwell's own DB on the same RDS instance as your primary production database.Because frequent DDL changes or large schema snapshots can create unnecessary I/O contention on your master node.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Use filtering: Only capture the specific tables your downstream consumers need - &lt;code&gt;--include_dbs&lt;/code&gt; or &lt;code&gt;--exclude_tables&lt;/code&gt;
Because, it reduces the CPU load on the daemon and minimizes the network "noise" sent to message broker (like Kafka or Kinesis)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Debezium:
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Snapshot from replica: configure the connector to perform its initial snapshot on a read-only replica rather than the primary writer.
Because it prevents the snapshot's long-running SELECT queries from locking tables or exhausting the primary database's connection pool during peak hours.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Optimize producer config: for high-volume pipelines, manually tune Kafka producer overrides like &lt;code&gt;producer.override.batch.size&lt;/code&gt; (e.g., to 1MB) and &lt;code&gt;producer.override.linger.ms&lt;/code&gt; (e.g., to 50ms).
This drastically improves throughput by batching smaller row changes into fewer network requests, reducing the overhead on your Kafka brokers.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There is no best tool, use CDC based on your need, your app!&lt;br&gt;
Utilize config, optimize based on load and reduce overhead by small effective changes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Happy capturing ~ Happy datafying :)&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>dataengineering</category>
      <category>tooling</category>
      <category>debezium</category>
      <category>maxwell</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
