<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Saly Ngo</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Saly Ngo (@saly_ngo_d995d0ca92a98143).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/saly_ngo_d995d0ca92a98143</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/saly_ngo_d995d0ca92a98143"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Honest take: I tested 12+ AI coding tools, but this one actually surprised me</title>
      <dc:creator>Saly Ngo</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 12:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/saly_ngo_d995d0ca92a98143/honest-take-i-tested-12-ai-coding-tools-but-this-one-actually-surprised-me-43ka</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/saly_ngo_d995d0ca92a98143/honest-take-i-tested-12-ai-coding-tools-but-this-one-actually-surprised-me-43ka</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;So I've been down the rabbit hole testing AI coding tools for the past 6 months. Base44, Bolt, Lovable... you know the drill.&lt;br&gt;
And we've all heard the jokes, right? "5 minutes to generate, 5 days to fix the bugs" or "vibe coding tools are just toys."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Honestly? I completely agreed. Most tools out there just pump out a quick MVP or prototype, but when it comes to building something you can actually use in production? Nah.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Then I stumbled on LunaBase AI on vibecodinglist.com&lt;br&gt;
What really got me was this: it starts with a planning phase. You and the AI align on what you're building before any code gets written.&lt;br&gt;
This might sound small, but it's huge. Instead of being at the mercy of whatever the AI decides to spit out, you're actually in control with detailed requirements.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here's the workflow that clicked for me:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Feg9qwbtuu44a64e93woq.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Feg9qwbtuu44a64e93woq.png" alt=" " width="800" height="450"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;I give it basic requirements&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;AI optimizes those requirements (or suggests multiple feature variations)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;I pick what fits my product vision&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Instead of prompting 10 times to get different features, it generates options upfront.
This alone saved me probably 5x the time on frontend development. Not exaggerating.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But here's where it gets better:&lt;br&gt;
Once you have your MVP, LunaBase AI has different copilots for each phase of development: Requirements copilot, Architecture copilot, Coding copilot, Q/A copilot, DevOps copilot. So you can actually finish the backend and take it to production. All in one place. No tool-hopping.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm not saying it's perfect, but it's the first tool I've used that treats AI coding assistance like actual software development—not just a party trick.&lt;br&gt;
Anyway, dropping the link heres if anyone wants to check it out. Would love to hear what others think: &lt;a href="https://lunabase.ai/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://lunabase.ai/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fmlcsqoiuu3m99utlty12.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fmlcsqoiuu3m99utlty12.png" alt=" " width="800" height="489"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fvrjuq8xubtv8zc9rtvrv.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fvrjuq8xubtv8zc9rtvrv.png" alt=" " width="800" height="520"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>product</category>
      <category>featurerequest</category>
      <category>deployment</category>
      <category>documentation</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Honest take: I tested 12+ AI vibe coding tools, but this one actually surprised me</title>
      <dc:creator>Saly Ngo</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 12:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/saly_ngo_d995d0ca92a98143/honest-take-i-tested-12-ai-vibe-coding-tools-but-this-one-actually-surprised-me-260c</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/saly_ngo_d995d0ca92a98143/honest-take-i-tested-12-ai-vibe-coding-tools-but-this-one-actually-surprised-me-260c</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;So I've been down the rabbit hole testing AI coding tools for the past 6 months. Base44, Bolt, Lovable... you know the drill.&lt;br&gt;
And we've all heard the jokes, right? "5 minutes to generate, 5 days to fix the bugs" or "vibe coding tools are just toys."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Honestly? I completely agreed. Most tools out there just pump out a quick MVP or prototype, but when it comes to building something you can actually use in production? Nah.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Then I stumbled on LunaBase AI on vibecodinglist.com&lt;br&gt;
What really got me was this: it starts with a planning phase. You and the AI align on what you're building before any code gets written.&lt;br&gt;
This might sound small, but it's huge. Instead of being at the mercy of whatever the AI decides to spit out, you're actually in control with detailed requirements.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here's the workflow that clicked for me:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I give it basic requirements&lt;br&gt;
AI optimizes those requirements (or suggests multiple feature variations)&lt;br&gt;
I pick what fits my product vision&lt;br&gt;
Instead of prompting 10 times to get different features, it generates options upfront This alone saved me probably 5x the time on frontend development. Not exaggerating.&lt;br&gt;
But here's where it gets better:&lt;br&gt;
Once you have your MVP, LunaBase AI has different copilots for each phase of development: Requirements copilot, Architecture copilot, Coding copilot, Q/A copilot, DevOps copilot. So you can actually finish the backend and take it to production. All in one place. No tool-hopping.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm not saying it's perfect, but it's the first tool I've used that treats AI coding assistance like actual software development—not just a party trick.&lt;br&gt;
Anyway, dropping the link heres if anyone wants to check it out. Would love to hear what others think: &lt;a href="https://lunabase.ai/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://lunabase.ai/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F87e13nggziy8opvb3iht.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F87e13nggziy8opvb3iht.png" alt=" " width="800" height="374"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>vscode</category>
      <category>tdd</category>
      <category>pairprogramming</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Honest take: I tested 12+ AI coding tools, but this one actually surprised me</title>
      <dc:creator>Saly Ngo</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 12:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/saly_ngo_d995d0ca92a98143/honest-take-i-tested-12-ai-coding-tools-but-this-one-actually-surprised-me-n2d</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/saly_ngo_d995d0ca92a98143/honest-take-i-tested-12-ai-coding-tools-but-this-one-actually-surprised-me-n2d</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;So I've been down the rabbit hole testing AI coding tools for the past 6 months. Base44, Bolt, Lovable... you know the drill.&lt;br&gt;
And we've all heard the jokes, right? "5 minutes to generate, 5 days to fix the bugs" or "vibe coding tools are just toys."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Honestly? I completely agreed. Most tools out there just pump out a quick MVP or prototype, but when it comes to building something you can actually use in production? Nah.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Then I stumbled on LunaBase AI on vibecodinglist.com&lt;br&gt;
What really got me was this: it starts with a planning phase. You and the AI align on what you're building before any code gets written.&lt;br&gt;
This might sound small, but it's huge. Instead of being at the mercy of whatever the AI decides to spit out, you're actually in control with detailed requirements.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here's the workflow that clicked for me:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;I give it basic requirements&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;AI optimizes those requirements (or suggests multiple feature variations)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;I pick what fits my product vision&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Instead of prompting 10 times to get different features, it generates options upfront
This alone saved me probably 5x the time on frontend development. Not exaggerating.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But here's where it gets better:&lt;br&gt;
Once you have your MVP, LunaBase AI has different copilots for each phase of development: Requirements copilot, Architecture copilot, Coding copilot, Q/A copilot, DevOps copilot. So you can actually finish the backend and take it to production. All in one place. No tool-hopping.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm not saying it's perfect, but it's the first tool I've used that treats AI coding assistance like actual software development—not just a party trick.&lt;br&gt;
Anyway, dropping the link heres if anyone wants to check it out. Would love to hear what others think: &lt;a href="https://lunabase.ai/%5B%5D(https://lunabase.ai/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://lunabase.ai/[](https://lunabase.ai/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fslhfcz2wos6z0su8m1e6.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fslhfcz2wos6z0su8m1e6.png" alt=" " width="800" height="520"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F7syaojlncixyp58lojfu.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F7syaojlncixyp58lojfu.png" alt=" " width="800" height="489"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>programming</category>
      <category>beginners</category>
      <category>frontend</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
