<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Satin Wuker</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Satin Wuker (@satinwuker).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/satinwuker</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/satinwuker"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>The Philosophy Behind a Programming Language (Discussion)</title>
      <dc:creator>Satin Wuker</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2023 06:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/satinwuker/the-philosophy-behind-a-programming-language-discussion-1oh3</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/satinwuker/the-philosophy-behind-a-programming-language-discussion-1oh3</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This is not an educational post, it is a discussion. I am making a new programming language. The purpose is to make a surpassing general-purpose language that can solve most of the problems of the mainstream languages in the current generation. I have a belief, that &lt;strong&gt;writing efficient code is the job of compilers, not the toil of programmers.&lt;/strong&gt; Programmers should only care about implementations of features, logic, and algorithm, not the syntax of the language. For example Rust, it sacrificed its programmers' development efficiency (borrow checking &amp;amp; lifetimes) in order to achieve generating a better and faster executable, of course without a garbage collector. (Perhaps this sounds offensive to Rust enthusiasts, my apology)&lt;br&gt;
This language is in its planning phase. I wrote a document about the basics of the syntax and the "philosophy" behind it, and I deem that there must be numerous things that can be improved or corrected.&lt;br&gt;
The link of basics.md: &lt;a href="https://github.com/SatinWuker/wonderwall-prototype/blob/main/basics.md" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://github.com/SatinWuker/wonderwall-prototype/blob/main/basics.md&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
If you have any suggestions, please comment below or issue on GitHub (which is preferred) Hope you guys can write very detailed suggestions to me!&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>discuss</category>
      <category>productivity</category>
      <category>tutorial</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What is Your Dream Programming Language Like?</title>
      <dc:creator>Satin Wuker</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2023 04:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/satinwuker/what-is-your-dream-programming-language-like-7cm</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/satinwuker/what-is-your-dream-programming-language-like-7cm</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Every programmer has different preferences in their code. Some like strict-logical OOP, some like bug-free functional languages. Some tried to create a language that resembles Python's flexibility and C's efficiency, while some stay conservative and favor archaic, old-fashion code style. In this period of unpredictability, new technology emerge, yet the older generations phased out and never came back. What is your dream programming language like? A language that can solve the problems or bugs that you are currently facing? A language that can make your life easier? What features does it have? It is not about implementability, it is only about your imagination! We can talk about everything under this post.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>beginners</category>
      <category>learning</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
