<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: SayoojGN</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by SayoojGN (@sayoojgn).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/sayoojgn</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/sayoojgn"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>I spent 2 weeks reading outdated docs at my new job - so I discussed with 20 devs about it</title>
      <dc:creator>SayoojGN</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 11:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/sayoojgn/i-spent-2-weeks-reading-outdated-docs-at-my-new-job-so-i-discussed-with-20-devs-about-it-23of</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/sayoojgn/i-spent-2-weeks-reading-outdated-docs-at-my-new-job-so-i-discussed-with-20-devs-about-it-23of</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  What They Said
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  Finding #1: The "2-Week Productive Gap"
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Around 17 said it takes 1-2 weeks minimum for new devs to become productive.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;senior devs spend 10-15 hours per hire just answering the same questions over and over again like:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;"Where's the login flow?"&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;"Why did we choose Redis over PostgreSQL for sessions?"&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;"How do I set this project up locally?"&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  Finding #2: The Real Problem Isn't Missing Documentation
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;13 out of 20 said they had documentation.&lt;br&gt;
But new developers still asked questions instead of reading it.&lt;br&gt;
Why?&lt;br&gt;
"Because half of it is outdated, and we don't know which half."&lt;br&gt;
The docs existed. They just couldn't be relied upon especially in fast-paced projects where things change daily.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  I asked developers what tools they currently use
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  Notion/Confluence (Common standard):
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Great for writing docs&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;manual updation of docs to stay up to date&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Nobody trusts them after 6 months&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  GitHub README:
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Looks similar to code (good)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Manual maintenance (bad)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Goes stale&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  Claude Code / ChatGPT (The trendy one):
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Can explain specific code files&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Doesn't have PR history or context&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Automatically creates documentation after providing necessary code files as context, but require manual trigger or prompt to keep them up to date&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Based on the discussions, here's what I believe would actually help
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  Documentation That Auto-Updates
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;New code merged -&amp;gt; docs automatically regenerate -&amp;gt; always accurate.&lt;br&gt;
No manual maintenance. No stale docs.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  Searchable Knowledge on Architecture / Design
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not just "what the code does" but "why we built it this way".&lt;br&gt;
Indexed from:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Code + comments&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;PR descriptions &amp;amp; discussions&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Architecture decision records&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  RAG-Powered Onboarding Assistant
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Imagine a new dev could ask:&lt;br&gt;
"How does authentication work in this codebase?"&lt;br&gt;
And get back sure shot answers with context on the codebase.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Instead of:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Searching GitHub for 15 minutes&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Reading 6 outdated docs&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Finally asking a senior dev&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;How long does onboarding take at your company? Is it days, weeks or months?&lt;br&gt;
What's the biggest bottleneck? Is it Finding information?&lt;br&gt;
Understanding why decisions were made?&lt;br&gt;
Knowing who to ask?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am really interested to know your Honest Feedback or Experience :)&lt;br&gt;
Before I build this, I want to validate I'm not solving a problem only we had.&lt;br&gt;
Does a clear solution / product already exist in the market.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>productivity</category>
      <category>automation</category>
      <category>learning</category>
      <category>startup</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
