<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: sezin öztekin</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by sezin öztekin (@sezin_oztekin).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/sezin_oztekin</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/sezin_oztekin"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>"We Have DevOps, So Why Not DataOps?"</title>
      <dc:creator>sezin öztekin</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 13:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/sezin_oztekin/we-have-devops-so-why-not-dataops-a55</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/sezin_oztekin/we-have-devops-so-why-not-dataops-a55</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Lately, we’ve all noticed the explosion of DevOps job postings on platforms like LinkedIn. It’s become a savior for most companies, yet for some, there’s still a why do we even need this, I can handle it myself mentality. In Turkey's corporate landscape, this often stems from what we might call white-collar pride or, to put it bluntly, a bit of an elitist perspective. We’ve all encountered that I created the world ego in big corporate brands. I wonder if this same ego exists among DevOps engineers? As a data engineer, I can’t help but ask: why shouldn't I have a DataOps of my own? Maybe I want to feel like I created the world too.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The reality of DataOps is that software developers enjoy every kind of AI support and a million DevOps tools that make their lives easier. Their feedback loops are much simpler because they usually have an undo button. If they are experienced, taking a backup or rolling back a deployment is significantly easier than what we face in the data world. In DevOps, you can scrap a broken container and spin up a new one in seconds. But in data, you can’t just scrap and recreate a five-year-old corrupted table. Data is a living organism; the comfortable break-and-fix world of DevOps doesn't apply to us. I feel like people in the data field are often pushed to the background or even looked down upon. Everyone notices when a developer builds a system, but they need to realize that without the right nuances, the data, that system is useless.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The data landscape is far more complex than it appears. Moving, organizing, and decluttering millions of rows is a massive undertaking. You can spin up a microservice in seconds, but moving or reformatting a 50-terabyte table is like fighting the laws of physics. In software, a bug crashes the app. In the data world, the system doesn't crash; it just flows incorrectly. The revenue on a dashboard looks wrong, but no one notices until it’s too late. While DevOps engineers monitor system pulses in milliseconds, we often find out about a data error via a phone call from the CEO. We used to have just a single SQL procedure. Now, we have Kafka, Airflow, Spark, dbt, and Snowflake, all interconnected. When one link breaks, the whole company goes blind. Once an executive sees a wrong number on a dashboard, it takes six months to earn that trust back. DataOps is the defense line built to protect that trust. The list goes on, but one thing is clear: DataOps is not just about increasing the headcount in a data team; it’s about giving data the engineering respect it deserves.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>datascience</category>
      <category>bigdata</category>
      <category>dataops</category>
      <category>devops</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
