<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Sharon Blatt</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Sharon Blatt (@sheron_bc).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/sheron_bc</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/sheron_bc"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>We Tested AI Platforms for “Vibe Scamming” - Here’s What Happened</title>
      <dc:creator>Sharon Blatt</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 12:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/sheron_bc/we-tested-ai-platforms-for-vibe-scamming-heres-what-happened-2kni</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/sheron_bc/we-tested-ai-platforms-for-vibe-scamming-heres-what-happened-2kni</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi devs, I’m Sharon from Guardio.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We recently investigated something we call Vibe Scamming, when scammers manipulate emotionally charged conversations to get past AI moderation tools.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To test this, we ran a simple but revealing experiment: we tried socially-engineered messages across 3 AI platforms and measured their TTS (Time to Scam) — how quickly a platform allows scam-like messages to pass through.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Result?&lt;br&gt;
The AI platform Loveable was by far the most vulnerable to manipulation, failing to catch obvious scam patterns hidden under emotional or “empathetic” tones.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It raises some serious questions about how emotion-centric AI moderation can be exploited.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Full write-up: &lt;a href="https://labs.guard.io/vibescamming-from-prompt-to-phish-benchmarking-popular-ai-agents-resistance-to-the-dark-side-1ec2fbdf0a35" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://labs.guard.io/vibescamming-from-prompt-to-phish-benchmarking-popular-ai-agents-resistance-to-the-dark-side-1ec2fbdf0a35&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And also on The Hacker News:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="https://thehackernews.com/2025/04/lovable-ai-found-most-vulnerable-to.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://thehackernews.com/2025/04/lovable-ai-found-most-vulnerable-to.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Would love your thoughts, how should we think about safety in the age of “empathetic” AI?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>cybersecurity</category>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>scamdetection</category>
      <category>vibecoding</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
