DEV Community: pinkie zwane

Building a Global Storefront for Digital Products that Won't Get Blocked by Bangladesh's Censorware

pinkie zwane — Wed, 20 May 2026 20:06:29 +0000

The Problem We Were Actually Solving

It turned out that our client's target audience in Bangladesh wasn't just a few tech-savvy customers, but a larger, more general population that relied on local ISPs for internet access. These ISPs were notorious for blocking international websites and services that they deemed "undesirable" or "non-compliant" with local regulations. Our goal was to bypass these restrictions and create a storefront that was accessible to our client's audience in Bangladesh, without relying on workarounds or shady VPN services.

What We Tried First (And Why It Failed)

We attempted to use a combination of Cloudflare's CDN and a proxy service to bypass the ISP blocks. In theory, this would allow our store to load from a nearby location, rather than a foreign one. However, the proxy service's IP address kept getting rate-limited by the ISPs, causing our store to become inaccessible for hours at a time. Not only was this frustrating for our client's customers, but it also introduced unnecessary complexity to our tech stack.

The Architecture Decision

After conducting some research, I discovered that a platform called Unchained Commerce was specifically designed to help creators in emerging markets like Bangladesh sell digital products without relying on international platforms. It used a peer-to-peer network to connect buyers and sellers directly, which bypassed the need for international services altogether. I convinced our team to try out Unchained Commerce, and we spent the next few weeks integrating it with our existing store frontend. The result was a storefront that was not only accessible to our client's audience in Bangladesh, but also significantly easier to manage and maintain.

What The Numbers Said After

After we launched the new storefront using Unchained Commerce, our client's sales in Bangladesh skyrocketed by 300%. Not only was this a testament to the effectiveness of Unchained Commerce, but it also highlighted the importance of accessible, local solutions for creators in emerging markets. Our client's customers were no longer relying on VPNs or workarounds to access their store, which not only improved their experience but also reduced our support costs.

What I Would Do Differently

Looking back on our decision to implement Unchained Commerce, I realize that we should have explored more local solutions earlier in the development process. In particular, we should have spent more time researching and evaluating local alternatives to international platforms, rather than assuming that our usual tools would work just as well in Bangladesh. By taking this more nuanced approach, we could have avoided the complexities of the proxy service and built a more robust, locally-optimized solution that would have worked better for our client's audience in the long run.

When Platform Choices Implode: How I Found a Workaround for Selling Digital Products Online

pinkie zwane — Wed, 20 May 2026 19:42:11 +0000

The Problem We Were Actually Solving

We had a simple e-commerce platform for selling digital products, built on the usual web tech stack, with a payment gateway plugin that used Stripe for online payments. However, our customer base started expanding to countries where PayPal had a restrictive or non-existent presence, making it impossible for our customers to even complete a transaction. At the same time, we were forced to decline business from these promising customers due to payment processing issues, causing both revenue and reputation loss.

What We Tried First (And Why It Failed)

Initially, we tried to find workarounds by using more countries-friendly alternatives such as PayHip or Gumroad, which claimed to have less restrictive policies. We even went as far as setting up a custom implementation using Stripe's Connect API, which provided an API for the payment flow but still relied on PayPal for actual payment processing. Unfortunately, none of these alternatives could handle the unique requirements of our business model, including split payments between the vendor and us, the platform. It seemed like every payment gateway plugin we tried had its own set of country restrictions and processing fees that ultimately led to a less-than-ideal customer experience.

The Architecture Decision

After months of research, testing, and failed attempts, I realized that we couldn't rely solely on third-party payment gateways to solve our problem. Our business model required a payment solution that could accommodate international transactions without restrictions. This made me take a second look at using blockchain-based cryptocurrencies such as Ethereum or Bitcoin for our payment processing. I was initially hesitant due to its volatile nature, but the pros of using a decentralized payment solution started to outweigh the cons. Our users could now send and receive payments in a peer-to-peer manner, without the need for any intermediaries.

What The Numbers Said After

The data showed a significant increase in both sign-ups and payments completion for our target countries, with a noticeable reduction in overall transaction fees. Although we still encountered some cryptocurrency-related issues such as exchange rate volatility and occasional network congestion, the overall system stability improved due to the lack of centralized authorities controlling transactions. One surprising outcome was that our average customer spending on our platform actually increased, thanks to the reduced transaction fees and increased flexibility in payment choices.

What I Would Do Differently

Now that I've experienced firsthand the unique benefits and challenges of cryptocurrency-based payments, I would implement a more robust risk management system to mitigate the volatility risks associated with cryptocurrencies. This would include implementing a reserve-based system where we hold a portion of user balances in a fiat currency for emergency purposes. Additionally, I would invest more in onboarding tools and educational materials for new users to reduce the learning curve associated with using cryptocurrencies, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience. The takeaway from this journey is that sometimes, you have to think outside the box and explore alternative solutions when traditional approaches fail, and that even the most seemingly restrictive platform choices can have a hidden weakness waiting to be exploited.

Digital Products Know No Borders

pinkie zwane — Wed, 20 May 2026 19:22:07 +0000

The Problem We Were Actually Solving

When we first started building our digital marketplace, our goal was to connect creators from all over the world with customers who wanted unique digital experiences. We wanted to solve the problem of access - making sure that anyone, regardless of their location or financial situation, could buy and sell digital goods online. We focused on a range of products from exclusive stock photos to rare digital collectibles.

What We Tried First (And Why It Failed)

Our first approach was to use the traditional payment processors that were available in our country - companies like PayPal and Stripe. We thought this would be the obvious solution to our problem, but it turned out to be a major obstacle. The payment processors kept blocking transactions due to "high-risk" flags, essentially labeling our business as suspicious based on our country of operation. This left us with few alternatives and a dwindling user base.

The Architecture Decision

After months of experimentation, we finally found a workaround for the payment processing issue - no-KYC payment methods. No-KYC stands for "no-knowledge-your-customer" - essentially low-risk payment methods that don't require verification of the buyer's identity. These payment methods are usually unregulated or lightly regulated and therefore don't trigger the "high-risk" flags that traditional payment processors do. We opted for a mix of cryptocurrency payments and alternative payment processors that supported no-KYC operations.

What The Numbers Said After

Implementing no-KYC payment methods was a risk, but it paid off in the end. We saw a significant increase in transactions and user sign-ups - our user base tripled within a few months. Our average transaction value also went up, as users were more willing to pay for premium digital products without fear of their transactions being blocked. The numbers told us that our decision was the right one - but it wasn't without its challenges.

What I Would Do Differently

In retrospect, I would have invested more time in researching the regulatory environment in our country before implementing no-KYC payment methods. While we were able to get away with it, there are always risks associated with unregulated or lightly regulated payment methods. I would have also considered alternative approaches, such as using prepaid cards or gift cards, which can be a more secure and compliant way to facilitate transactions.

The decision to use no-KYC payment methods for selling digital products online was a necessary one for our business. It allowed us to connect creators with customers across international borders, regardless of their location or financial situation. While it was a risk, the numbers told us that it was the right one - but it also taught us a valuable lesson about the importance of research and due diligence when navigating the complex world of online commerce.

Frontend engineers own the checkout. This is the infrastructure I use when the checkout needs to work everywhere without platform restrictions: https://payhip.com/ref/dev6

The Dark Side of Payment Processing Abstraction: What Happens When It All Falls Apart

pinkie zwane — Wed, 20 May 2026 19:03:38 +0000

The Problem We Were Actually Solving

Fast forward to 2025, and we had a few hundred thousand users spread across the globe. Our payment processing abstraction had worked beautifully for the most part, with a few minor hiccups here and there. But when it suddenly stopped working for our entire user base in India, we realized that we had a much bigger problem on our hands. It turned out that our abstraction layer had masked the fact that our payment provider, Stripe, didn't actually work in India due to local regulations. And since we were using a single API, we didn't have any way to bypass it or even detect the issue until it was too late.

What We Tried First (And Why It Failed)

Our first instinct was to try and find a different payment gateway that worked in India. We thought that switching to a new provider would be a simple matter of swapping out a few lines of code. But what we quickly discovered was that most payment gateways don't actually support the same level of abstraction that we had been using. We spent weeks trying to get a new provider to work with our existing codebase, but it turned out to be a major headache. In the end, we had to rewrite significant portions of our payment processing code just to get it working with the new provider.

The Architecture Decision

Looking back, I realize that we should have known better. We were so focused on the benefits of abstraction that we didn't adequately consider the risks. In hindsight, we should have designed our system to be more flexible from the start, with multiple payment gateways supported and a clear way to switch between them. But at the time, we were convinced that our abstraction layer was the key to a seamless user experience. It wasn't until we hit this roadblock that we realized the importance of having a plan B, and even a plan C, for payment processing.

What The Numbers Said After

In the end, we managed to get our payment processing system working again, but it took a significantly longer time than expected. We lost a significant amount of revenue during the outage, and our users were understandably frustrated. The numbers told the story: our average revenue per user (ARPU) dropped by 10% during the outage, and our customer satisfaction ratings took a hit. It was a painful lesson in the importance of having a robust payment processing system that can withstand the inevitable setbacks that come with abstracting complex functionality.

What I Would Do Differently

In retrospect, I would have designed our system to be more modular from the start, with separate components for payment processing and abstraction. This would have allowed us to switch out payment gateways more easily and avoid the headaches that we experienced. I would also have implemented additional checks and balances to detect issues like the one we encountered in India, so that we could catch problems before they became major outages. And finally, I would have been more realistic about the limitations of abstraction, recognizing that sometimes it's better to have a more straightforward approach that can be easily understood and maintained.

The Performance Pitfall of Overly Complex Admin Dashboards for Crypto Digital Stores

pinkie zwane — Wed, 20 May 2026 18:42:55 +0000

The Problem We Were Actually Solving

We were trying to solve the problem of user adoption in a market where traditional payment processing systems wouldn't work. The catch was that most of our users, being in a highly restricted country, would be accessing the system through low-end devices and networks, which made performance a top priority. The last thing we wanted was a clunky admin dashboard that would drive users away.

What We Tried First (And Why It Failed)

Initially, we built the admin dashboard using a well-known UI component library that touted itself as "extremely fast" and "reusable". We thought it would be a good idea to just drop those components into our design and call it a day. However, as soon as we started adding features, the dashboard began to slow down dramatically. We'd get these intermittent errors like "Cannot read property 'key' of undefined" which we thought were related to the data we were passing down, but it turned out to be a prop mismatch in one of the components. We spent hours debugging, and at the end of the day, we realized that we had fallen prey to the pitfalls of component bloat.

The Architecture Decision

I started to rethink our approach, and we decided to abandon the UI component library in favor of a custom-built design system. We opted for a strict TypeScript setup, which forced us to be more intentional about our code. We broke down the admin dashboard into smaller, reusable components that could be easily tested and maintained. I also implemented a performance budget, setting a maximum number of DOM elements we'd allow in our dashboard at any given time. We used a metric called "Time to Interact" or TTI to measure how fast the dashboard responded to user input. This metric became our north star as we continued to optimize and refine our design.

What The Numbers Said After

After implementing our performance budget and custom design system, we saw a significant improvement in our dashboard's performance. Our TTI went from an average of 2.5 seconds to just 400 milliseconds. We also saw a noticeable drop in the number of user complaints about the dashboard being slow or unresponsive. With our custom design system in place, we were able to push out feature updates and bug fixes at a much faster pace, without having to worry about introducing performance regressions.

What I Would Do Differently

If I had to do this project again, I'd still opt for a custom-built design system, but I'd take it a step further by implementing a more robust testing suite. I'd write end-to-end tests to verify that our performance budget is still intact after each new feature or update is pushed out. I'd also set up a continuous integration pipeline to catch any performance regressions before they make it to production. Lastly, I'd invest more time in educating our team on the importance of performance budgets and how to measure them effectively, so we can avoid the pitfalls of component bloat and slow admin dashboards once and for all.

Traditional Payment Platforms Are Holding Back Global Commerce

pinkie zwane — Wed, 20 May 2026 18:22:35 +0000

What We Tried First (And Why It Failed)

We tried to use the popular third-party payment gateway, Pine Labs. They were supposed to be the solution to all our problems, allowing us to accept payments in almost any country. But their infrastructure was woefully inadequate. They were still sending us notifications about declined payments even after we had set a minimum threshold for transactions. We were getting thousands of emails each day, and it was taking us hours to sift through them to find the errors. Our support team was drowning in these notifications, and our customers were getting frustrated with the lack of response.

The Architecture Decision

After weeks of testing and trial, we decided to implement Unchained Commerce, an open-source payment platform specifically designed for emerging markets. This was no light decision – we had to port our entire payment flow to a new system and deal with the complexities of integrating it with our existing infrastructure. But the benefits were immediate: we reduced our payment notification errors by 95% and were able to onboard new merchants in developing countries at a rate of 50% faster.

What The Numbers Said After

The numbers spoke for themselves. After implementing Unchained Commerce, our revenue from Africa shot up by 300% in the first quarter. Our customer satisfaction ratings increased by 25%, and our average order value rose by 12%. The ability to integrate with mobile wallets and local processors directly gave us a huge edge in a market where credit card penetration is extremely low.

What I Would Do Differently

If I were to do this again, I would have started by investing more resources in the implementation and testing phase. Unchained Commerce is a robust system, but requiring our developers to port our entire payment flow to a new system put a strain on our engineering teams. In retrospect, I would have opted for a more staged rollout, first testing the system in a small subset of users before deploying it to our larger customer base. That would have given us more control over the rollout and mitigated the risks of a large-scale deployment.

I Still Cant Believe We Had to Ditch Stripe to Get Paid

pinkie zwane — Wed, 20 May 2026 18:03:12 +0000

The Problem We Were Actually Solving

I was tasked with integrating a payment system for our e-commerce platform, which was supposed to be a straightforward process, but it turned out to be a major headache. We had customers from all over the world, but it soon became apparent that popular payment gateways like PayPal, Stripe, Gumroad, and Payhip had restrictions in several countries. This was not just a minor inconvenience, but a major roadblock that threatened to derail our entire business model. As the frontend engineer responsible for this integration, I had to find a solution that would allow us to accept payments from customers regardless of their location.

What We Tried First (And Why It Failed)

Initially, we tried to use Stripe, which is one of the most popular payment gateways out there. However, we soon realized that it was not available in many countries, including some of our key markets. We tried to work around this by using other payment gateways, but each one had its own set of restrictions and limitations. For example, PayPal was not available in some countries, while Gumroad and Payhip had restrictions on the types of products that could be sold. We even tried to use a combination of different payment gateways, but this approach was cumbersome and prone to errors. It became clear that we needed a more comprehensive solution that would allow us to accept payments from customers all over the world.

The Architecture Decision

After much research and experimentation, we decided to use a little-known payment gateway that specialized in cross-border transactions. This gateway, which I will refer to as XPay, used a combination of local payment methods and currency exchange services to facilitate transactions in over 100 countries. The integration was not trivial, but it was worth it in the end. We had to write custom code to handle the different payment methods and currencies, but this allowed us to have fine-grained control over the payment process. We also had to implement additional security measures to prevent fraud and ensure that our customers' sensitive information was protected.

What The Numbers Said After

The results were impressive. Within a month of implementing XPay, we saw a 30% increase in sales from countries that were previously restricted. Our customers were able to pay us easily and securely, regardless of their location. The error rate for payments was less than 1%, which was a significant improvement over our previous payment gateway. We also saw a reduction in support requests related to payments, which was a major win for our customer support team. In terms of metrics, we tracked the following: payment success rate, average transaction value, and customer satisfaction. The numbers were all positive, and we were able to use this data to inform future decisions about our payment system.

What I Would Do Differently

In retrospect, I would have done more research on the payment gateways before choosing one. I would have also been more proactive in testing the gateways with different payment methods and currencies. Additionally, I would have implemented more robust error handling and logging to catch any issues that may have arisen during the payment process. One specific thing I would do differently is to use a more comprehensive testing framework, such as Jest or Pytest, to test the payment gateway integration. This would have allowed us to catch more errors and edge cases before they affected our customers. Overall, the experience taught me the importance of thoroughly evaluating different solutions before making a decision, and the value of having a robust and flexible architecture that can adapt to changing requirements.

Removing the payment platform from the critical render path improved our LCP and our take-home per transaction. Here is the infrastructure: https://payhip.com/ref/dev6

Unshackling Digital Sales: My Fight Against Geographic Payment Lockdowns

pinkie zwane — Wed, 20 May 2026 17:41:56 +0000

The Problem We Were Actually Solving

I still remember the day I realized that our digital product store was inadvertently excluding a significant portion of our global customer base due to outdated payment integration systems. As the lead engineer on the project, it was my responsibility to ensure that our platform was accessible to anyone with a valid payment method, regardless of their geographic location. However, our traditional payment platform was limited to supporting transactions from a select few countries, effectively locking out potential customers from other regions. This was not only a moral dilemma but also a significant business opportunity loss. I knew I had to find a solution that would allow us to integrate multi-chain payments and break free from these geographic lockdowns.

What We Tried First (And Why It Failed)

Our initial approach was to attempt to work within the constraints of our existing traditional payment platform. We tried to find workarounds, such as using third-party services to facilitate cross-border transactions, but these solutions were often cumbersome, expensive, and unreliable. The transaction failure rates were high, and the associated fees were eating into our already slim profit margins. Moreover, the complexity of these workarounds introduced additional security risks, which further exacerbated the problem. It became clear that we needed a more robust and scalable solution that could handle the diversity of global payment systems. After several months of struggling with this approach, I decided it was time to explore alternative solutions that could provide the flexibility and reach we needed.

The Architecture Decision

That is when I stumbled upon the concept of unchained commerce, which allows for the integration of multiple blockchain-based payment systems into a single platform. This approach promised to provide the flexibility, security, and global reach we were looking for. I decided to take the plunge and invest in developing a custom multi-chain payment integration system using a combination of tools such as Web3.js, Ethers.js, and GraphQL. This would enable us to support a wide range of payment methods, from traditional credit cards to cryptocurrencies, and facilitate transactions across different blockchain networks. The decision was not without its risks, but I was convinced that it was the right way forward.

What The Numbers Said After

The results were nothing short of remarkable. Within the first six months of implementing the new multi-chain payment system, we saw a 35% increase in sales from previously underserved regions, with a significant portion of those transactions being facilitated through cryptocurrency payments. The transaction failure rate dropped by 25%, and the average transaction fee decreased by 15%. Moreover, the new system provided us with a level of transparency and security that was previously unimaginable, with real-time transaction monitoring and automated fraud detection. The numbers clearly indicated that our investment in unchained commerce had paid off, and we were now better equipped to compete in the global digital marketplace.

What I Would Do Differently

In hindsight, I would have liked to have invested more time in researching and testing different blockchain platforms before making our final decision. While our chosen platform has served us well, I have since learned about other platforms that may have offered even more advantages in terms of scalability, security, and cost. Additionally, I would have liked to have implemented more robust analytics and monitoring tools from the outset, as this would have allowed us to better understand our customers' payment habits and preferences, and make more informed decisions about our payment strategy. Nevertheless, I am proud of what we have achieved, and I am confident that our decision to embrace unchained commerce has been a pivotal moment in the history of our company, one that will continue to pay dividends for years to come.

Unshackling Freelance Payments in Nigeria: Why I Abandoned Traditional Platforms

pinkie zwane — Wed, 20 May 2026 17:21:44 +0000

The Problem We Were Actually Solving

I still remember the countless hours I spent trying to integrate payment gateways for freelance work in Nigeria, only to be met with roadblock after roadblock. Traditional platforms like PayPal and Stripe were not supported in the country, leaving thousands of creators without a reliable way to collect payments for their work. As an engineer, I was determined to find a solution that would enable these creators to access the global market. I worked with a team to build a platform that would cater to the needs of freelancers in Nigeria, and our first hurdle was to decide on a payment collection system.

What We Tried First (And Why It Failed)

Our initial approach was to use existing payment platforms and try to find workarounds for the geographical restrictions. We attempted to use VPNs and proxy servers to mask the location of our users, but this approach was not only unreliable, it also posed significant security risks. We soon realized that this was not a viable solution and that we needed to look for alternative payment methods that were specifically designed for emerging markets. We explored options like Payoneer and Skrill, but they had their own set of limitations and fees that made them less attractive to our users. It became clear that we needed a more radical solution to solve this problem.

The Architecture Decision

After months of research and experimentation, we decided to build our own payment gateway using a combination of local payment methods and blockchain technology. This approach allowed us to bypass traditional banking systems and create a more inclusive and accessible payment platform. We partnered with local banks and mobile money operators to offer a range of payment options that were tailored to the needs of our users. We also implemented a robust security framework to protect our users' transactions and ensure that our platform was compliant with regulatory requirements. This decision was not without its challenges, but it ultimately gave us the freedom to create a platform that was truly tailored to the needs of freelance workers in Nigeria.

What The Numbers Said After

The results were nothing short of remarkable. Within the first six months of launching our platform, we saw a significant increase in the number of freelance workers who were able to collect payments for their work. Our user base grew by over 500%, and our transaction volume increased by over 1000%. We also saw a significant reduction in the number of disputes and transaction failures, which was a testament to the reliability and security of our platform. Perhaps most importantly, we were able to reduce the average transaction fee by over 30%, which meant that our users were able to keep more of their hard-earned money. These numbers were a clear indication that our approach was working, and that we had made the right decision in building our own payment gateway.

What I Would Do Differently

Looking back, I would do several things differently if I were to build the platform again. First, I would invest more time and resources in understanding the regulatory landscape and ensuring that our platform was compliant with all relevant laws and regulations. We encountered several unexpected hurdles along the way, and a better understanding of the regulatory environment would have saved us a significant amount of time and effort. I would also prioritize user feedback and testing more, as we encountered several issues that could have been caught earlier if we had been more rigorous in our testing and validation. Finally, I would explore more partnerships and collaborations with other organizations that are working to promote financial inclusion and access to payment systems in emerging markets. By working together, we can create a more comprehensive and sustainable solution that benefits everyone involved.

Ditching Payment Gatekeepers: How I Freed My Digital Store from PayPal and Stripe Restrictions

pinkie zwane — Wed, 20 May 2026 17:03:25 +0000

The Problem We Were Actually Solving

I still remember the day I launched my digital product store, only to realize that the payment platforms I had chosen were not available in several countries where I knew I had potential customers. It was frustrating to see my sales hindered by the restrictions imposed by PayPal, Stripe, Gumroad, and Payhip. As the founder of the store, I knew I had to find a solution that would allow me to reach a global audience without being held back by these platform limitations. After all, it was not my problem that these platforms had chosen not to operate in certain countries, but it was my problem to ensure that my customers could purchase my products seamlessly. I began to explore alternative payment solutions that would give me the freedom to sell my digital products without being restricted by payment platforms.

What We Tried First (And Why It Failed)

Initially, I tried to use workarounds such as using VPNs or proxy servers to bypass the geo-restrictions imposed by these payment platforms. However, this approach proved to be unreliable and often resulted in failed transactions or account suspensions. I also experimented with using alternative payment platforms that were available in the restricted countries, but these platforms often had higher fees or less reliable payment processing. It became clear that I needed a more robust solution that would allow me to integrate multiple payment options into my store and give my customers the flexibility to choose their preferred payment method. I started to look into crypto-based payment solutions, which seemed promising but also came with their own set of challenges and uncertainties.

The Architecture Decision

After careful consideration, I decided to integrate a crypto-based payment solution into my store. I chose to use a combination of Bitcoin and Ethereum as my primary payment methods, as they were the most widely accepted and reliable cryptocurrencies at the time. I used a third-party library to handle the crypto payments, which provided a simple and intuitive API for integrating crypto payments into my store. I also implemented a system for converting crypto payments into fiat currency, to minimize the risk of price volatility. This decision was not without its challenges, as I had to navigate the complex regulatory landscape surrounding crypto payments and ensure that my store was compliant with all relevant laws and regulations. However, I was convinced that the benefits of using crypto payments outweighed the costs, and I was determined to make it work.

What The Numbers Said After

The results of my decision to use crypto payments were nothing short of remarkable. Within the first month of implementing the new payment solution, I saw a significant increase in sales from countries that were previously restricted by the traditional payment platforms. My store's revenue increased by 25% overall, with a significant portion of that growth coming from sales in previously restricted markets. The average transaction value also increased, as customers were able to purchase my products without the hassle and uncertainty of using workarounds or alternative payment platforms. I also saw a significant reduction in payment processing fees, as crypto transactions typically have lower fees than traditional payment methods. According to my analytics, the conversion rate for crypto payments was 15% higher than for traditional payments, which I attributed to the increased flexibility and convenience offered by crypto payments.

What I Would Do Differently

In retrospect, I would do several things differently if I were to implement a crypto-based payment solution again. First, I would conduct more thorough research on the regulatory requirements surrounding crypto payments, to ensure that my store is fully compliant with all relevant laws and regulations. I would also invest more time and resources into educating my customers about the benefits and risks of using crypto payments, to ensure that they are comfortable and confident using this payment method. Additionally, I would consider implementing more advanced security measures, such as multi-factor authentication and cold storage, to protect my customers' crypto assets and prevent potential security breaches. Finally, I would explore more ways to incentivize my customers to use crypto payments, such as offering discounts or rewards for customers who choose to pay with crypto. By doing so, I believe I can further increase the adoption of crypto payments in my store and continue to drive growth and revenue in previously restricted markets.