<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Stack &amp; Craft</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Stack &amp; Craft (@stack_and_craft).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/stack_and_craft</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/stack_and_craft"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Before You Add an LLM, Build a Baseline</title>
      <dc:creator>Stack &amp; Craft</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2026 14:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/stackandcraft/before-you-add-an-llm-build-a-baseline-1927</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/stackandcraft/before-you-add-an-llm-build-a-baseline-1927</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;When a team says “let’s add AI,” it is tempting to start by comparing models. Start with the user’s task instead.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A &lt;strong&gt;baseline&lt;/strong&gt; is the simplest version of a solution that helps with the task before introducing a model. It gives you a clear point of comparison and often shows that search, rules, or a better workflow can solve part of the problem.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Example: routing support tickets
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Suppose a support team receives billing, account-access, and technical tickets. The goal is not “use an LLM.” The goal is to get each ticket to the right queue quickly, while sending uncertain cases to a person.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Write the task in one sentence:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Given a support ticket, suggest a queue and explain why; send uncertain cases to a human reviewer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Start with clear rules for obvious cases, such as invoices going to billing and password-reset requests going to account access. Keep the suggestion visible for a reviewer. Save a representative test set that includes incomplete, ambiguous, and out-of-scope tickets.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Then compare a model
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Run the model on the same examples and compare correctness by category, unsafe mistakes, review rate, response time, and cost per ticket. A model is useful only if the measured gain is worth its extra cost and operational work. Keep rules where they work well.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Design the failure path
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Treat model output as a suggestion. Validate its category, handle timeouts, and send low-confidence or invalid results to a person. Avoid storing private ticket text unless there is a clear need.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The sequence is simple: define the user problem, build the smallest useful baseline, measure it, then let a model prove it improves the result.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Stack &amp;amp; Craft shares practical engineering guides at &lt;a href="https://stackandcraft.in/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://stackandcraft.in/&lt;/a&gt; .&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>softwareengineering</category>
      <category>beginners</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
