<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Tokmyrza Kakenov</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Tokmyrza Kakenov (@sumatoxa).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/sumatoxa</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/sumatoxa"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>How I Built a SaaS Boilerplate for Vibe Coders in 2026</title>
      <dc:creator>Tokmyrza Kakenov</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 17:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/sumatoxa/how-i-built-a-saas-boilerplate-for-vibe-coders-in-2026-32f2</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/sumatoxa/how-i-built-a-saas-boilerplate-for-vibe-coders-in-2026-32f2</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Vibe coding changed how I build software. I describe what I want, AI writes the code. But there's a problem nobody talks about.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The 60-80 problem
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;AI tools generate 60-80% of boilerplate correctly. The remaining 20-40% requires debugging, refactoring, and domain knowledge.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is where most vibe coders get stuck. The AI builds something that looks right, but under the hood it's fragile and inconsistent.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  My solution: give AI better context
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I built KitRocket — a SaaS boilerplate designed specifically for AI coding tools.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The key insight: &lt;strong&gt;AI works better when it understands the codebase.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here's what that means in practice:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  Small files
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Every file is under 100 lines. AI tools have context windows — smaller files mean better comprehension.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  Consistent patterns
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Every module follows the same structure: &lt;code&gt;lib/&lt;/code&gt; → &lt;code&gt;api/&lt;/code&gt; → &lt;code&gt;components/&lt;/code&gt; → &lt;code&gt;hooks/&lt;/code&gt; → &lt;code&gt;types/&lt;/code&gt;. Once AI learns one module, it can build another.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  Types as documentation
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;All shared types live in &lt;code&gt;src/types/&lt;/code&gt;. AI reads these to understand the data contracts between modules.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  Prompt Recipes
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is the killer feature. Each recipe is a markdown file that describes a complete feature:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="highlight js-code-highlight"&gt;
&lt;pre class="highlight markdown"&gt;&lt;code&gt;&lt;span class="gh"&gt;# Recipe: Add Dashboard&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;span class="gu"&gt;## What this builds&lt;/span&gt;
Analytics dashboard with stat cards and charts.

&lt;span class="gu"&gt;## Files created&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class="p"&gt;-&lt;/span&gt; src/app/(dashboard)/dashboard/analytics/page.tsx
&lt;span class="p"&gt;-&lt;/span&gt; src/components/dashboard/stat-card.tsx
&lt;span class="p"&gt;-&lt;/span&gt; src/components/dashboard/signup-chart.tsx

&lt;span class="gu"&gt;## Prompt&lt;/span&gt;
You are working on KitRocket, a Next.js SaaS boilerplate.
Create an analytics dashboard following existing patterns...
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;



&lt;p&gt;You paste this into Claude Code or Cursor. The AI reads the architecture context, follows the file paths, and builds the feature correctly.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  CLAUDE.md
&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Claude Code reads this file automatically at the start of every session. It's under 80 lines and includes: project structure, commands, patterns, and rules.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The tech stack
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I chose each tool deliberately:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Next.js 15&lt;/strong&gt; (App Router) — Server Components, API routes, SSG&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Supabase&lt;/strong&gt; — free PostgreSQL, real-time capable&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Drizzle ORM&lt;/strong&gt; — lightweight, type-safe, AI-friendly&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Better Auth&lt;/strong&gt; — flexible, no lock-in&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;DodoPayments&lt;/strong&gt; — Merchant of Record (taxes handled globally)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Vercel AI SDK&lt;/strong&gt; — streaming, multi-provider&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Resend + React Email&lt;/strong&gt; — beautiful transactional emails&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Tailwind v4 + shadcn/ui&lt;/strong&gt; — utility-first, accessible&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  What I'd do differently
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Start with one tier.&lt;/strong&gt; I initially had Starter ($99) and Pro ($199). Two tiers create decision friction. One price ($77) converts better.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Build the marketing site separately.&lt;/strong&gt; The product repo and the sales site are different codebases. Mixing them creates complexity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Invest in Prompt Recipes earlier.&lt;/strong&gt; They're the differentiator. Every hour spent on recipes saves buyers 10+ hours.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Results
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just launched. The site is live at kitrocket.dev. Goal is 65 sales in 3 months.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you're building a SaaS in 2026 and using AI coding tools — give it a look. The boring part is done.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>webdev</category>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>nextjs</category>
      <category>saas</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
