<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Suren</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Suren (@suren_enfiajyan).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/suren_enfiajyan</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/suren_enfiajyan"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>AI isn't just a tool and it might be dangerous</title>
      <dc:creator>Suren</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/suren_enfiajyan/ai-isnt-just-a-tool-and-it-might-be-dangerous-5906</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/suren_enfiajyan/ai-isnt-just-a-tool-and-it-might-be-dangerous-5906</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Many people say that AI is just another tool. But this is not quite true. Unlike any other tools, it doesn't just solve or automate some narrow problem, it constantly learns and adapts which allows it to compete with our cognitive abilities.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fr2tlv4p1ee5sldc47zx6.webp" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fr2tlv4p1ee5sldc47zx6.webp" alt="AI isn't just a tool and it might be dangerous" width="600" height="420"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>opinion</category>
      <category>rant</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Browsers are becoming more bloated</title>
      <dc:creator>Suren</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/suren_enfiajyan/browsers-are-becoming-more-bloated-11lh</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/suren_enfiajyan/browsers-are-becoming-more-bloated-11lh</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Modern browsers are basically operating systems disguised as applications and binary size bloat is an engineering concern. What will happen if browsers keep growing their size?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Ftpl84gzovqk4uufrkzwz.webp" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Ftpl84gzovqk4uufrkzwz.webp" alt="Browsers are becoming more bloated" width="600" height="338"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>chrome</category>
      <category>firefox</category>
      <category>web</category>
      <category>webstandards</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Avoid using "&lt;![CDATA[ ... ]]&gt;" in RSS</title>
      <dc:creator>Suren</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/suren_enfiajyan/avoid-using-in-rss-1nli</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/suren_enfiajyan/avoid-using-in-rss-1nli</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;"&amp;lt;![CDATA[...]]&amp;gt;" is often used in feeds to escape XML special characters. However, it can cause issues in some edge cases.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>rant</category>
      <category>rss</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I'll probably never use Windows</title>
      <dc:creator>Suren</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/suren_enfiajyan/ill-probably-never-use-windows-4n5</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/suren_enfiajyan/ill-probably-never-use-windows-4n5</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Windows, as a traditional operating system that users controlled, is becoming a thing of the past. Microsoft is gradually eroding personal computing.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>rant</category>
      <category>privacy</category>
      <category>freedom</category>
      <category>windows</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>My thoughts on OS-level age verification</title>
      <dc:creator>Suren</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/suren_enfiajyan/my-thoughts-on-os-level-age-verification-3ike</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/suren_enfiajyan/my-thoughts-on-os-level-age-verification-3ike</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Discussing the controversial law and its implications for operating systems, including free and open source, that will take effect in California in 2027.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>rant</category>
      <category>privacy</category>
      <category>freedom</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is throwing an exception a faster way to break out of recursion in JavaScript?</title>
      <dc:creator>Suren</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/suren_enfiajyan/is-throwing-an-exception-a-faster-way-to-break-out-of-recursion-in-javascript-3oa1</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/suren_enfiajyan/is-throwing-an-exception-a-faster-way-to-break-out-of-recursion-in-javascript-3oa1</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Exceptions are designed for error handling. But what if use exceptions as a fast way to break out of recursion?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fnjpp5z9lotbhqd6uij6r.webp" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fnjpp5z9lotbhqd6uij6r.webp" alt="Is throwing an exception a faster way to break out of recursion in JavaScript?" width="800" height="882"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>javascript</category>
      <category>benchmark</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Upcoming JavaScript features in 2026</title>
      <dc:creator>Suren</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2026 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/suren_enfiajyan/upcoming-javascript-features-in-2026-1b57</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/suren_enfiajyan/upcoming-javascript-features-in-2026-1b57</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The list of upcoming JavaScript features that every web developer should know in 2026.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fv6suqppftl78vw5qni6n.webp" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fv6suqppftl78vw5qni6n.webp" alt="Upcoming JavaScript features in 2026" width="473" height="318"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>web</category>
      <category>javascript</category>
      <category>ecmascript</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Moltbook - the craziest AI experiment in 2026</title>
      <dc:creator>Suren</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/suren_enfiajyan/moltbook-the-craziest-ai-experiment-in-2026-5d29</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/suren_enfiajyan/moltbook-the-craziest-ai-experiment-in-2026-5d29</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;We are now witnessing one of the craziest experiments where only AI agents communicate in a Reddit-like social platform. Will this end up in something interesting and valuable or will it be another trash?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fsosfjf5c1qozv2ef5brl.webp" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fsosfjf5c1qozv2ef5brl.webp" alt="Moltbook - the craziest AI experiment in 2026" width="541" height="316"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>opinion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Prefer repeating selectors over !important keyword in CSS</title>
      <dc:creator>Suren</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2026 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/suren_enfiajyan/prefer-repeating-selectors-over-important-keyword-in-css-3f3c</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/suren_enfiajyan/prefer-repeating-selectors-over-important-keyword-in-css-3f3c</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;How using !important keyword as a quick fix will be harmful in the long term and what should be preferred instead.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fl7hsex2xmsbhqdjfx55z.webp" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fl7hsex2xmsbhqdjfx55z.webp" alt="Prefer repeating selectors over !important keyword in CSS" width="500" height="525"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>css</category>
      <category>web</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>1 kilobyte is precisely 1000 bytes</title>
      <dc:creator>Suren</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/suren_enfiajyan/1-kilobyte-is-precisely-1000-bytes-55pk</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/suren_enfiajyan/1-kilobyte-is-precisely-1000-bytes-55pk</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;We usually learn that 1 kilobyte is 1024 bytes, 1 MB is 1024 kilobytes, etc. But is this true or a kilobyte is precisely 1000 bytes?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fqmpbjzsqqdwniwckhwrq.webp" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fqmpbjzsqqdwniwckhwrq.webp" alt="1 kilobyte is precisely 1000 bytes" width="694" height="500"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>opinion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The future of Stack Overflow</title>
      <dc:creator>Suren</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/suren_enfiajyan/the-future-of-stack-overflow-1inb</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/suren_enfiajyan/the-future-of-stack-overflow-1inb</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Stack Overflow, once the cornerstone developer communities, is fading away. What is the future of Stack Overflow considering its recent declining popularity?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F3gkehy02dzfo9barc6rv.webp" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F3gkehy02dzfo9barc6rv.webp" alt="The future of Stack Overflow" width="800" height="412"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>stackoverflow</category>
      <category>opinion</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>JavaScript's for-of loops are actually fast</title>
      <dc:creator>Suren</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2025 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/suren_enfiajyan/javascripts-for-of-loops-are-actually-fast-2a9e</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/suren_enfiajyan/javascripts-for-of-loops-are-actually-fast-2a9e</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Running some benchmarks with different types of loops in JavaScript to see how well for of loops perform compared to other loops.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fotjdcffzvdj4ji21tmfq.webp" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fotjdcffzvdj4ji21tmfq.webp" alt="JavaScript's for of loops are actually fast" width="800" height="891"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ecmascript</category>
      <category>javascript</category>
      <category>benchmark</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
